Use of an Activity Monitor and GPS Device to Assess Community Activity and Participation in Transtibial Amputees

被引:32
|
作者
Hordacre, Brenton [1 ]
Barr, Christopher [1 ]
Crotty, Maria [1 ]
机构
[1] Flinders Univ S Australia, Dept Rehabil & Aged Care, Adelaide, SA 5041, Australia
关键词
amputees; rehabilitation; technology; activity monitor; activity; participation; wearable sensors; LOWER-LIMB AMPUTATION; GLOBAL POSITIONING SYSTEM; WALKING ABILITY; STEP ACTIVITY; ACCELEROMETER DATA; REHABILITATION; MOBILITY; AMBULATION; PEOPLE; INDIVIDUALS;
D O I
10.3390/s140405845
中图分类号
O65 [分析化学];
学科分类号
070302 ; 081704 ;
摘要
This study characterized measures of community activity and participation of transtibial amputees based on combined data from separate accelerometer and GPS devices. The relationship between community activity and participation and standard clinical measures was assessed. Forty-seven participants were recruited (78% male, mean age 60.5 years). Participants wore the accelerometer and GPS devices for seven consecutive days. Data were linked to assess community activity (community based step counts) and community participation (number of community visits). Community activity and participation were compared across amputee K-level groups. Forty-six participants completed the study. On average each participant completed 16,645 (standard deviation (SD) 13,274) community steps and 16 (SD 10.9) community visits over seven days. There were differences between K-level groups for measures of community activity (F-(2,F-45) = 9.4, p < 0.001) and participation (F-(2,F-45) = 6.9, p = 0.002) with lower functioning K1/2 amputees demonstrating lower levels of community activity and participation than K3 and K4 amputees. There was no significant difference between K3 and K4 for community activity (p = 0.28) or participation (p = 0.43). This study demonstrated methodology to link accelerometer and GPS data to assess community activity and participation in a group of transtibial amputees. Differences in K-levels do not appear to accurately reflect actual community activity or participation in higher functioning transtibial amputees.
引用
收藏
页码:5845 / 5859
页数:15
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Use of small fluorescent molecules to monitor channel activity
    Jones, SE
    Naik, RR
    Stone, MO
    [J]. BIOCHEMICAL AND BIOPHYSICAL RESEARCH COMMUNICATIONS, 2000, 279 (01) : 208 - 212
  • [32] Development and validation of a physical activity monitor for use on a wheelchair
    E H Coulter
    P M Dall
    L Rochester
    J P Hasler
    M H Granat
    [J]. Spinal Cord, 2011, 49 : 445 - 450
  • [33] Using The Activity Barometer (TAB) to assess patient participation in diagnostic consultations
    Frolund, J.
    Farver-Vestergaard, I
    Poulsen, H.
    Hilberg, O.
    Lokke, A.
    [J]. EUROPEAN RESPIRATORY JOURNAL, 2022, 60
  • [34] The use of locomotor activity equipment to assess analgesic and anti-inflammatory activity
    Thompson, SL
    Clayton, NM
    Oakley, IG
    Bountra, C
    [J]. BRITISH JOURNAL OF PHARMACOLOGY, 1997, 120 : P220 - P220
  • [35] PORTABLE DEVICE TO MONITOR AUTONOMIC NERVOUS SYSTEM ACTIVITY THROUGH CLOTHES
    Lee, Kang Moo
    Lee, Seung Min
    Chung, Gih Sung
    Lee, Hong Ji
    Lim, Yong Gyu
    Park, Kwang Suk
    [J]. BIODEVICES 2011, 2011, : 276 - +
  • [36] ANESTHESIA AND BRAIN ACTIVITY MONITOR (A B M), A MULTIPURPOSE DEVICE FOR NEUROMONITORING
    SULG, IA
    MONSTAD, P
    [J]. UPSALA JOURNAL OF MEDICAL SCIENCES, 1986, : 49 - 49
  • [37] Validation of the Fitbit One activity monitor device during treadmill walking
    Takacs, Judit
    Pollock, Courtney L.
    Guenther, Jerrad R.
    Bahar, Mohammadreza
    Napier, Christopher
    Hunt, Michael A.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF SCIENCE AND MEDICINE IN SPORT, 2014, 17 (05) : 496 - 500
  • [38] Validating the Fitbit Charge 4© wearable activity monitor for use in physical activity interventions
    Waddell, Alexander
    Birkett, Stefan
    Broom, David
    McGregor, Gordon
    Harwood, Amy E.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF SCIENCE AND MEDICINE IN SPORT, 2024, 27 (05) : 314 - 318
  • [39] Which activity monitor to use? Validity, reproducibility and user friendliness of three activity monitors
    Berendsen, Brenda A. J.
    Hendriks, Marike R. C.
    Meijer, Kenneth
    Plasqui, Guy
    Schaper, Nicolaas C.
    Savelberg, Hans H. C. M.
    [J]. BMC PUBLIC HEALTH, 2014, 14
  • [40] AN EXAMINATION OF THE RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN MOTIVATION, PHYSICAL ACTIVITY AND WEARABLE ACTIVITY MONITOR USE.
    Friel, Ciaran P.
    Ciccolo, Joseph
    Garber, Carol
    [J]. ANNALS OF BEHAVIORAL MEDICINE, 2019, 53 : S49 - S49