Two Perspectives on Preferences and Structural Transformation
被引:238
|
作者:
Herrendorf, Berthold
论文数: 0引用数: 0
h-index: 0
机构:
Arizona State Univ, WP Carey Sch Business, Dept Econ, Tempe, AZ 85287 USAArizona State Univ, WP Carey Sch Business, Dept Econ, Tempe, AZ 85287 USA
Herrendorf, Berthold
[1
]
Rogerson, Richard
论文数: 0引用数: 0
h-index: 0
机构:
Princeton Univ, Woodrow Wilson Sch, Princeton, NJ 08544 USA
NBER, Cambridge, MA 02138 USAArizona State Univ, WP Carey Sch Business, Dept Econ, Tempe, AZ 85287 USA
Rogerson, Richard
[2
,3
]
Valentinyi, Akos
论文数: 0引用数: 0
h-index: 0
机构:
Cardiff Univ, Cardiff Business Sch, Cardiff CF10 3AX, S Glam, WalesArizona State Univ, WP Carey Sch Business, Dept Econ, Tempe, AZ 85287 USA
Valentinyi, Akos
[4
]
机构:
[1] Arizona State Univ, WP Carey Sch Business, Dept Econ, Tempe, AZ 85287 USA
[2] Princeton Univ, Woodrow Wilson Sch, Princeton, NJ 08544 USA
[3] NBER, Cambridge, MA 02138 USA
[4] Cardiff Univ, Cardiff Business Sch, Cardiff CF10 3AX, S Glam, Wales
We assess the empirical importance of changes in income and relative prices for structural transformation in the postwar United States. We explain two natural approaches to the data: sectors may be categories of final expenditure or value added; e. g., the service sector may be the final expenditure on services or the value added from service industries. We estimate preferences for each approach and find that with final expenditure income effects are the dominant force behind structural transformation, whereas with value-added categories price effects are more important. We show how the input-output structure of the United States can reconcile these findings.