Predicting the Pillar Stability of Underground Mines with Random Trees and C4.5 Decision Trees

被引:32
|
作者
Ahmad, Mahmood [1 ,2 ]
Al-Shayea, Naser A. [3 ]
Tang, Xiao-Wei [1 ]
Jamal, Arshad [3 ]
Al-Ahmadi, Hasan M. [3 ]
Ahmad, Feezan [1 ]
机构
[1] Dalian Univ Technol, State Key Lab Coastal & Offshore Engn, Dalian 116024, Peoples R China
[2] Univ Engn & Technol Peshawar, Dept Civil Engn, Bannu Campus, Bannu 28100, Pakistan
[3] King Fahd Univ Petr & Minerals, Dept Civil & Environm Engn, KFUPM Box 5055, Dhahran 31261, Saudi Arabia
来源
APPLIED SCIENCES-BASEL | 2020年 / 10卷 / 18期
关键词
pillar stability; underground mines; random tree; C4; 5 decision tree; prediction; CLASSIFICATION; STRENGTH; DESIGN;
D O I
10.3390/app10186486
中图分类号
O6 [化学];
学科分类号
0703 ;
摘要
Predicting pillar stability in underground mines is a critical problem because the instability of the pillar can cause large-scale collapse hazards. To predict the pillar stability for underground coal and stone mines, two new models (random tree and C4.5 decision tree algorithms) are proposed in this paper. Pillar stability depends on the parameters: width of the pillar (W), height of the pillar (H), W/H ratio, uniaxial compressive strength of the rock (sigma(ucs)), and pillar stress (sigma(p)). These parameters are taken as input variables, while underground mines pillar stability as output. Various performance indices, i.e., accuracy, precision, recall, F-measure, Matthews correlation coefficient (MCC) were used to evaluate the performance of the models. The performance evaluation of the established models showed that both models were able to predict pillar stability with reasonable accuracy. Results of the random tree and C4.5 decision tree were also compared with available models of support vector machine (SVM) and fishery discriminant analysis (FDA). The results show that the proposed random tree provides a reliable and feasible method of evaluating the pillar stability for underground mines.
引用
收藏
页数:12
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Bounds on the moments for an ensemble of random decision trees
    Amit Dhurandhar
    Knowledge and Information Systems, 2015, 44 : 279 - 298
  • [42] Bounds on the moments for an ensemble of random decision trees
    Dhurandhar, Amit
    KNOWLEDGE AND INFORMATION SYSTEMS, 2015, 44 (02) : 279 - 298
  • [43] Decision trees for predicting the academic success of students
    Mesaric, Josip
    Sebalj, Dario
    CROATIAN OPERATIONAL RESEARCH REVIEW, 2016, 7 (02) : 367 - 388
  • [44] Predicting Credit Scores with Boosted Decision Trees
    Bastos, Joao A.
    FORECASTING, 2022, 4 (04): : 925 - 935
  • [45] Network Traffic Classification - A Comparative Study of Two Common Decision Tree Methods: C4.5 and Random Forest
    Munther, Alhamza
    Othman, Rozmie R.
    Alalousi, Alabass
    Anbar, Mohammed
    Nizam, Shahrul
    2014 2ND INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON ELECTRONIC DESIGN (ICED), 2014, : 210 - 214
  • [46] Prediction of Rockburst Risk in Coal Mines Based on a Locally Weighted C4.5 Algorithm
    Wang, Yanbin
    IEEE ACCESS, 2021, 9 : 15149 - 15155
  • [47] Performance of Decision Tree C4.5 Algorithm in Student Academic Evaluation
    Budiman, Edy
    Haviluddin
    Dengan, Nataniel
    Kridalaksana, Awang Harsa
    Wati, Masna
    Purnawansyah
    COMPUTATIONAL SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY, ICCST 2017, 2018, 488 : 380 - 389
  • [48] Application of Decision Tree C4.5 Algorithm in Air Quality Evaluation
    Hu, Nan
    Li, Qing
    PROCEEDINGS OF THE 2017 2ND INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON AUTOMATION, MECHANICAL CONTROL AND COMPUTATIONAL ENGINEERING (AMCCE 2017), 2017, 118 : 1095 - 1099
  • [49] The Research and Analysis in Decision Tree Algorithm Based on C4.5 Algorithm
    Hao, Huan
    Chen, Tieming
    Lu, Jing
    Liu, Jie
    Ma, Xiaodan
    PROCEEDINGS OF 2018 IEEE 3RD ADVANCED INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY, ELECTRONIC AND AUTOMATION CONTROL CONFERENCE (IAEAC 2018), 2018, : 1882 - 1886
  • [50] Improved C4.5 Decision Tree Algorithm Based on Sample Selection
    Chen, Fucai
    Li, Xiaowei
    Liu, Lixiong
    PROCEEDINGS OF 2013 IEEE 4TH INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON SOFTWARE ENGINEERING AND SERVICE SCIENCE (ICSESS), 2012, : 779 - 782