Developing Calibration Factors for Crash Prediction Models with Consideration of Crash Recording Threshold Change

被引:3
|
作者
Jalayer, Mohammad [1 ]
Zhou, Huaguo [1 ]
Williamson, Michael [2 ]
LaMondia, Jeffrey J. [1 ]
机构
[1] Auburn Univ, Dept Civil Engn, Auburn, AL 36849 USA
[2] Indiana State Univ, Dept Civil Engn, Terre Haute, IN 47809 USA
关键词
D O I
10.3141/2515-08
中图分类号
TU [建筑科学];
学科分类号
0813 ;
摘要
The focus of this paper is on presenting a revised method to develop calibration factors (CFs) with consideration of the change in the crash recording threshold (CRT), which is a minimum value to report crashes. The higher the CRT, the fewer the number of recorded property damage only (PDO) crashes. In this paper, a threshold adjustment factor was defined and used to estimate the new CFs. Because the threshold change affects only the total number of crashes and the PDO crashes, the percentage of fatal and injury (F/I) crashes before the threshold change needs to be adjusted to properly estimate the total number of F/I crashes. The revised method was verified with case studies using Illinois data. Five years of crash data were gathered and used to develop CFs for five roadway types, including two-lane undivided (2U), two-lane with a two-way left-turn lane (3T), four-lane undivided (4U), four-lane divided (4D), and four-lane with a two-way left-turn lane (5T). Because of an increase in the CRT in 2009, a method is needed to supplement the standard approach to adjust CFs with consideration of the effect of the new CRT. The CFs for 2U and 3T before after considering the threshold adjustment factor were 1.44/1.32 and 1.24/1.12, respectively, while the CFs before after the threshold change for 4U, 4D, and 5T were 0.99/0.85, 0.68/0.55, and 0.77/0.69, respectively. The results proved that the revised method can help state and local agencies predict the number of crashes without redeveloping new CFs resulting from the change in CRT.
引用
收藏
页码:57 / 62
页数:6
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Linear regression crash prediction models: Issues and proposed solutions
    Rakha, H.
    Arafeh, M.
    Abdel-Salam, A. G.
    Guo, F.
    Flintsch, A. M.
    EFFICIENT TRANSPORTATION AND PAVEMENT SYSTEMS: CHARACTERIZATION, MECHANISMS, SIMULATION, AND MODELING, 2009, : 241 - 255
  • [22] Planning-Level Crash Prediction Models in Southern California
    Hamilton, Ian
    Himes, Scott
    Wang, Yang
    Tanzen, Riana
    Zhou, Yuying
    TRANSPORTATION RESEARCH RECORD, 2023, 2677 (02) : 431 - 442
  • [23] Outcome Prediction of TBI: Are There Parameters That Affect the IMPACT and CRASH Models?
    Bilgi, Kanchan
    Gopalakrishna, Kadarapura Nanjundaiah
    Chakrabarti, Dhritiman
    Rao, G. S. Umamaheswara
    WORLD NEUROSURGERY, 2021, 146 : E590 - E596
  • [24] Influence of Calibration Factors on Crash Prediction on Rural Two-Lane Two-Way Roadway Segments
    Llopis-Castello, David
    Findley, Daniel J.
    JOURNAL OF TRANSPORTATION ENGINEERING PART A-SYSTEMS, 2019, 145 (06)
  • [25] Sensitivity of a real-time freeway crash prediction model to calibration optimality
    Amir Samimi
    Bruce Hellinga
    Samimi, A. (asamimi@sharif.edu), 1600, Springer Verlag (04): : 167 - 174
  • [26] Cognitive change, medical illness, and crash risk among older drivers: An epidemiological consideration
    Wallace, RB
    ALZHEIMER DISEASE & ASSOCIATED DISORDERS, 1997, 11 : 31 - 37
  • [27] On the nature of over-dispersion in motor vehicle crash prediction models
    Mitra, Sudeshna
    Washington, Simon
    ACCIDENT ANALYSIS AND PREVENTION, 2007, 39 (03): : 459 - 468
  • [28] Some comments on 'Inventory models with fixed and variable lead time crash costs consideration'
    Hoque, MA
    Goyal, S
    JOURNAL OF THE OPERATIONAL RESEARCH SOCIETY, 2004, 55 (06) : 674 - 676
  • [29] Freeway Truck Traffic Safety in Wyoming: Crash Characteristics and Prediction Models
    Haq, Muhammad Tahmidul
    Zlatkovic, Milan
    Ksaibati, Khaled
    TRANSPORTATION RESEARCH RECORD, 2019, 2673 (10) : 333 - 342
  • [30] An international review of challenges and opportunities in development and use of crash prediction models
    Jiří Ambros
    Chris Jurewicz
    Shane Turner
    Mariusz Kieć
    European Transport Research Review, 2018, 10