Risk factors for massive hemorrhage during the treatment of cesarean scar pregnancy: a systematic review and meta-analysis

被引:20
|
作者
Zhang, Yuan [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Zhang, Zhongyun [4 ,5 ]
Liu, Xiaoyan [6 ]
Zhang, Lei [7 ]
Hong, Fanzhen [7 ]
Lu, Ming [1 ,2 ,3 ]
机构
[1] Shandong Univ, Cheeloo Coll Med, Sch Publ Hlth, Jinan, Peoples R China
[2] Shandong Univ, Qilu Hosp, Clin Epidemiol Unit, Jinan, Peoples R China
[3] Shandong Univ, Clin Res Ctr, Jinan, Peoples R China
[4] Shanghai Jiao Tong Univ, Sch Med, Ruijin Hosp, Dept Endocrinol & Metab, Shanghai, Peoples R China
[5] Shandong Univ, Cheeloo Coll Med, Sch Med, Jinan, Peoples R China
[6] Shandong Univ, Dept Obstet, Qilu Hosp, Jinan, Peoples R China
[7] Shandong Univ, Dept Obstet, Hosp 2, Jinan, Peoples R China
基金
国家重点研发计划;
关键词
Cesarean scar pregnancy; Massive hemorrhage; Risk factors; Meta-analysis; HUMAN CHORIONIC-GONADOTROPIN; INTRAOPERATIVE HEMORRHAGE; MANAGEMENT;
D O I
10.1007/s00404-020-05877-9
中图分类号
R71 [妇产科学];
学科分类号
100211 ;
摘要
Purpose Cesarean scar pregnancy (CSP) is one of the serious complications associated with cesarean delivery (CD). This meta-analysis aims to identify risk factors associated with massive hemorrhage during the CSP treatment. Methods Eight electronic databases were searched for case-control studies published before December 31th, 2018, which compared the possible factors causing massive bleeding during the CSP treatment. Quantitative synthesis was performed by RevMan 5.3. Sensitivity analysis and publication bias were performed by Stata 12.0. Results Total 20 case - control studies including 3101 CSP patients with previous CD met the inclusion criteria. Bleeding group had 573 patients and the control group had 2528 patients. The risk factors for massive bleeding during CSP treatment included multiple gravidities (MD = 0.15, 95% CI 0.03-0.28, P = 0.73), big maximum diameter of gestation sac (MD = 18.49 mm, 95%CI 15.34-21.65, P < 0.01), high gestational days (MD = 8.98 days, 95% CI 4.12-13.84, P < 0.01), high beta-HCG level (MD = 21.39 IU/ml, 95% CI 7.36-35.41, P = 0.03; MD = 3.02 U/ml, 95% CI 0.21-5.84, P < 0.01) and rich blood flow around the lesion (OR = 6.73, 95% CI 3.93-11.51, P = 0.59). While, thick myometrium (MD = - 4.94 mm, 95% CI - 6.12 to - 3.75, P < 0.01) may be protective factor. Conclusions Multiple gravidities, big gestation sac, large gestational days, high serum beta-HCG level, abundant blood supply to pregnancy sac and thin myometrium maybe the risk factors for massive bleeding during the CSP treatment.
引用
收藏
页码:321 / 328
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Risk factors for asthma exacerbation during pregnancy: protocol for a systematic review and meta-analysis
    Marleen P. Bokern
    Annelies L. Robijn
    Megan E. Jensen
    Daniel Barker
    Katherine J. Baines
    Vanessa E. Murphy
    [J]. Systematic Reviews, 11
  • [22] Risk Factors for Atonic Postpartum Hemorrhage A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis
    Ende, Holly B.
    Lozada, M. James
    Chestnut, David H.
    Osmundson, Sarah S.
    Walden, Rachel L.
    Shotwell, Matthew S.
    Bauchat, Jeanette R.
    [J]. OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 2021, 137 (02): : 305 - 323
  • [23] Risk factors for asthma exacerbation during pregnancy: protocol for a systematic review and meta-analysis
    Bokern, Marleen P.
    Robijn, Annelies L.
    Jensen, Megan E.
    Barker, Daniel
    Baines, Katherine J.
    Murphy, Vanessa E.
    [J]. SYSTEMATIC REVIEWS, 2022, 11 (01)
  • [24] Four Surgical Strategies for the Treatment of Cesarean Scar Defect: A Systematic Review and Network Meta-analysis
    He, Yunan
    Zhong, Jiaojiao
    Zhou, Wei
    Zeng, Sen
    Li, Hui
    Yang, Hui
    Shan, Nianchun
    [J]. JOURNAL OF MINIMALLY INVASIVE GYNECOLOGY, 2020, 27 (03) : 593 - 602
  • [25] Risk factors for blood transfusion in Cesarean section: A systematic review and meta-analysis
    Iqbal, Kinza
    Iqbal, Ayman
    Rathore, Sawai Singh
    Ahmed, Jawad
    Ali, Shajeea Arshad
    Farid, Eisha
    Hasanain, Muhammad
    Azeem, Qiraat
    Qadar, Laila Tul
    Memon, Fouzia Rasool
    Azim, Dua
    [J]. TRANSFUSION CLINIQUE ET BIOLOGIQUE, 2022, 29 (01) : 3 - 10
  • [26] Cesarean Scar Pregnancy: A Systematic Review
    Gonzalez, Natalia
    Tulandi, Togas
    [J]. JOURNAL OF MINIMALLY INVASIVE GYNECOLOGY, 2017, 24 (05) : 731 - 738
  • [27] Cesarean scar defects and abnormal uterine bleeding: a systematic review and meta-analysis
    Murji, Ally
    Sanders, Ari P.
    Monteiro, Ilza
    Haiderbhai, Shabbir
    Matelski, John
    Walsh, Chris
    Abbott, Jason A.
    Munro, Malcolm G.
    Maheux-Lacroix, Sarah
    [J]. FERTILITY AND STERILITY, 2022, 118 (04) : 758 - 766
  • [28] Risk factors of prognosis for spontaneous cerebellar hemorrhage: a systematic review and meta-analysis
    Shu, Junbin
    Wang, Wei
    Ye, Ruyong
    Zhou, Yonggang
    Tong, Jianfeng
    Li, Xiaobo
    Lv, Xiaojun
    Zhang, Guangliang
    Xu, Feng
    Zhang, Jing
    [J]. ACTA NEUROCHIRURGICA, 2024, 166 (01)
  • [29] Intraoperative Cell Salvage for Women at High Risk of Postpartum Hemorrhage During Cesarean Section: a Systematic Review and Meta-analysis
    Nathan Obore
    Zhang Liuxiao
    Yu Haomin
    Tao Yuchen
    Lina Wang
    Yu Hong
    [J]. Reproductive Sciences, 2022, 29 : 3161 - 3176
  • [30] Intraoperative Cell Salvage for Women at High Risk of Postpartum Hemorrhage During Cesarean Section: a Systematic Review and Meta-analysis
    Obore, Nathan
    Zhang Liuxiao
    Yu Haomin
    Tao Yuchen
    Wang, Lina
    Yu Hong
    [J]. REPRODUCTIVE SCIENCES, 2022, 29 (11) : 3161 - 3176