Cage production and laying hen welfare

被引:7
|
作者
Hemsworth, Paul H. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Melbourne, Fac Vet & Agr Sci, Anim Welf Sci Ctr, Parkville, Vic 3010, Australia
关键词
animal behaviour; animal welfare; housing; management; poultry; stress physiology;
D O I
10.1071/AN19609
中图分类号
S8 [畜牧、 动物医学、狩猎、蚕、蜂];
学科分类号
0905 ;
摘要
Although many factors affect the welfare of hens housed in cage and non-cage systems, welfare issues in cage systems often involve behavioural restrictions, whereas many welfare issues in non-cage systems involve health and hygiene. This review considers and compares the welfare of laying hens in cages, both conventional and furnished cages, with that of hens in non-cage systems, so as to highlight the welfare implications, both positive and negative, of cage housing. Comparisons of housing systems, particularly in commercial settings, are complex because of potentially confounding differences in physical, climatic and social environments, genetics, nutrition and management. Furthermore, some of the confounding factors are inherent to some specific housing systems. Nevertheless, research in commercial and experimental settings has indicated that hens in conventional and furnished cages have lower (or similar), but not higher, levels of stress on the basis of glucocorticoid concentrations than do hens in non-cage systems. Furthermore, caged hens, generally, have lower mortality rates than do hens in non-cage systems. However, the behavioural repertoire of laying hens housed in conventional cages is clearly more compromised than that of hens in non-cage systems. In contrast to conventional cages, furnished cages may provide opportunities for positive emotional experiences arising from perching, dust-bathing, foraging and nesting in a nest box. Some have suggested that the problems with modern animal production is not that the animals are unable to perform certain behavioural opportunities, but that they are unable to fill the extra time available with limited behaviours when they have no need to find food, water or shelter. Environmental enrichment in which objects or situations are presented that act successfully, and with a foreseeable rewarding outcome for hens by also providing regular positive emotional experience, is likely to enhance hen welfare. Research on cage systems highlights the importance of the design of the housing system rather than just the housing system per se.
引用
收藏
页码:821 / 836
页数:16
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] European study on the comparative welfare of laying hens in cage and non-cage systems
    Elson, H. A.
    Croxall, Rebecca
    [J]. ARCHIV FUR GEFLUGELKUNDE, 2006, 70 (05): : 194 - 198
  • [32] Effects of Furnished Cage Type on Behavior and Welfare of Laying Hens
    Li, Xiang
    Chen, Donghua
    Li, Jianhong
    Bao, Jun
    [J]. ASIAN-AUSTRALASIAN JOURNAL OF ANIMAL SCIENCES, 2016, 29 (06): : 887 - 894
  • [33] Causes of feather pecking and subsequent welfare issues for the laying hen: a review
    Cronin, Greg M.
    Glatz, Phil C.
    [J]. ANIMAL PRODUCTION SCIENCE, 2021, 61 (9-10) : 990 - 1005
  • [34] Impact of antibiotic use and disease risks on Australian laying hen welfare
    Groves, Peter J.
    Underwood, Greg
    [J]. ANIMAL PRODUCTION SCIENCE, 2021, 61 (9-10) : 1037 - 1041
  • [35] Ammonia and greenhouse gas emissions from an enriched cage laying hen facility
    Alberdi, Oier
    Arriaga, Haritz
    Calvet, Salvador
    Estelles, Fernando
    Merino, Pilar
    [J]. BIOSYSTEMS ENGINEERING, 2016, 144 : 1 - 12
  • [36] Effects of beak trimming and cage design on laying hen performance and egg quality
    Guesdon, V
    Ahmed, AMH
    Mallet, S
    Faure, JM
    Nys, Y
    [J]. BRITISH POULTRY SCIENCE, 2006, 47 (01) : 1 - 12
  • [37] The effect of cage density on laying hen performance, egg quality, and excreta minerals
    Saki, A. Asghar
    Zamani, P.
    Rahmati, M.
    Mahmoudi, H.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF APPLIED POULTRY RESEARCH, 2012, 21 (03): : 467 - 475
  • [38] Cage Versus Noncage Laying-Hen Housings: Worker Respiratory Health
    Mitchell, Diane
    Arteaga, Veronica
    Armitage, Tracey
    Mitloehner, Frank
    Tancredi, Daniel
    Kenyon, Nicholas
    Schenker, Marc
    [J]. JOURNAL OF AGROMEDICINE, 2015, 20 (03) : 256 - 264
  • [39] Concentrations and Emissions of Ammonia from Different Laying Hen Production Systems of Conventional Cage, Aviary and Natural Mating Colony Cage in North China Plain
    Liu, Yu
    Zhang, Guoqiang
    Rong, Li
    Li, Zongyang
    Wang, Shaojie
    Wang, Chaoyuan
    [J]. APPLIED SCIENCES-BASEL, 2020, 10 (19):
  • [40] Microbiome applications for laying hen performance and egg production
    Ricke, Steven C.
    Dittoe, Dana K.
    Olson, Elena G.
    [J]. POULTRY SCIENCE, 2022, 101 (05)