共 50 条
Improving physical activity, sedentary behaviour and sleep in COPD: perspectives of people with COPD and experts via a Delphi approach
被引:17
|作者:
Lewthwaite, Hayley
[1
]
Effing, Tanja W.
[2
,3
]
Lenferink, Anke
[4
,5
]
Olds, Tim
[1
]
Williams, Marie T.
[1
]
机构:
[1] Univ South Australia, Sch Hlth Sci, Alliance Res Exercise Nutr & Act, Adelaide, SA, Australia
[2] Flinders Univ South Australia, Coll Med & Publ Hlth, Bedford Pk, SA, Australia
[3] Southern Adelaide Local Hlth Network, Dept Resp Med, Bedford Pk, SA, Australia
[4] Medisch Spectrum Twente, Dept Pulm Med, Enschede, Netherlands
[5] Univ Twente, Fac Behav Sci, Dept Hlth Technol & Serv Res, Enschede, Netherlands
来源:
关键词:
Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease;
Health behaviour;
Habitual behaviours;
Disease management;
Patient preference;
Behaviour change;
OBSTRUCTIVE PULMONARY-DISEASE;
RESPIRATORY SOCIETY STATEMENT;
QUALITY-OF-LIFE;
REHABILITATION;
INTERVENTIONS;
METAANALYSIS;
MORTALITY;
HEALTH;
TIME;
HOSPITALIZATION;
D O I:
10.7717/peerj.4604
中图分类号:
O [数理科学和化学];
P [天文学、地球科学];
Q [生物科学];
N [自然科学总论];
学科分类号:
07 ;
0710 ;
09 ;
摘要:
Background. Little is known about how to achieve enduring improvements in physical activity (PA), sedentary behaviour (SB) and sleep for people with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD). This study aimed to: (1) identify what people with COPD from South Australia and the Netherlands, and experts from COPD- and non-COPD-specific backgrounds considered important to improve behaviours; and (2) identify areas of dissonance between these different participant groups. Methods. A four-round Delphi study was conducted, analysed separately for each group. Free-text responses (Round 1) were collated into items within themes and rated for importance on a 9-point Likert scale (Rounds 2-3). Items meeting a priori criteria from each group were retained for rating by all groups in Round 4. Items and themes achieving a median Likert score of >= 7 and an interquartile range of <= 2 across all groups at Round 4 were judged important. Analysis of variance with Tukey's post-hoc tested for statistical differences between groups for importance ratings. Results. Seventy-three participants consented to participate in this study, of which 62 (85%) completed Round 4. In Round 4, 81 items (PA n = 54; SB n = 24; sleep n = 3) and 18 themes (PA n = 9; SB n = 7; sleep n = 2) were considered important across all groups concerning. (1) symptom/disease management, (2) targeting behavioural factors, and (3) less commonly, adapting the social/physical environments. There were few areas of dissonance between groups. Conclusion. Our Delphi participants considered a multifactorial approach to be important to improve PA, SB and sleep. Recognising and addressing factors considered important to recipients and providers of health care may provide a basis for developing behaviour-specific interventions leading to long-term behaviour change in people with COPD.
引用
收藏
页数:23
相关论文