Quantification of predictive uncertainty with a metamodel: toward more efficient hydrologic simulations

被引:20
|
作者
Vinh Ngoc Tran [1 ,2 ]
Kim, Jongho [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Ulsan, Sch Civil & Environm Engn, Ulsan, South Korea
[2] VNU Univ Sci, Ctr Environm Fluid Dynam, Hanoi, Vietnam
关键词
Uncertainty quantification; Hydrologic prediction; Polynomial chaos expansion; Generalized likelihood uncertainty estimation; Sensitivity analysis; CHAIN MONTE-CARLO; GLOBAL SENSITIVITY-ANALYSIS; SEQUENTIAL DATA ASSIMILATION; POLYNOMIAL CHAOS EXPANSION; STOCHASTIC FINITE-ELEMENT; RAINFALL-RUNOFF MODELS; FORMAL BAYESIAN METHOD; PARAMETER UNCERTAINTY; SUBSURFACE FLOW; AUTOMATIC CALIBRATION;
D O I
10.1007/s00477-019-01703-0
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
Hydrologic flood prediction has been a quite complex and difficult task because of various sources of inherent uncertainty. Accurately quantifying these uncertainties plays a significant role in providing flood warnings and mitigating risk, but it is time-consuming. To offset the cost of quantifying the uncertainty, we adopted a highly efficient metamodel based on polynomial chaos expansion (PCE) theory and applied it to a lumped, deterministic rainfall-runoff model (NedbOr-AfstrOmnings model, NAM) combined with generalized likelihood uncertainty estimation (GLUE). The central conclusions are: (1) the subjective aspects of GLUE (e.g., the cutoff threshold values of likelihood function) are investigated for 8 flood events that occurred in the Thu bon river watershed in Vietnam, resulting that the values of 0.82 for Nash-Sutcliffe efficiency, 4.05% for peak error, and 4.35% for volume error are determined as the acceptance thresholds. Moreover, the number of ensemble behavioral sets required to maintain the sufficient range of uncertainty but to avoid any unnecessary computation was set to 500. (2) The number of experiment designs (N) and degree of polynomial (p) are key factors in estimating PCE coefficients, and values of N=50 and p=4 are preferred. (3) The results computed using a PCE model consisting of polynomial bases are as good as those given by the NAM, while the total times required for making an ensemble in the PCE model are approximately seventeen times faster. (4) Two parameters (CQOF and CK12) turned out to be most dominant based on a visual inspection of the posterior distribution and the mathematical computations of the Sobol' and Morris sensitivity analysis. Identification of the posterior parameter distributions from the calibration process helps to find the behavioral sets even faster. The unified framework that presents the most efficient ways of predicting flow regime and quantifying the uncertainty without deteriorating accuracy will ultimately be helpful for providing warnings and mitigating flood risk in a timely manner.
引用
收藏
页码:1453 / 1476
页数:24
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Microscale poroelastic metamodel for efficient mesoscale bone remodelling simulations
    C. C. Villette
    A. T. M. Phillips
    [J]. Biomechanics and Modeling in Mechanobiology, 2017, 16 : 2077 - 2091
  • [22] Microscale poroelastic metamodel for efficient mesoscale bone remodelling simulations
    Villette, C. C.
    Phillips, A. T. M.
    [J]. BIOMECHANICS AND MODELING IN MECHANOBIOLOGY, 2017, 16 (06) : 2077 - 2091
  • [23] Uncertainty Quantification for the RCS of a Coated Target using an IBC-based Metamodel
    Pagani, Pascal
    Minvielle-Larrousse, Pierre
    Sesques, Muriel
    [J]. 2021 51ST EUROPEAN MICROWAVE CONFERENCE (EUMC), 2021, : 241 - 244
  • [24] Data space inversion for efficient uncertainty quantification using an integrated surface and sub-surface hydrologic model
    Delottier, Hugo
    Doherty, John
    Brunner, Philip
    [J]. GEOSCIENTIFIC MODEL DEVELOPMENT, 2023, 16 (14) : 4213 - 4231
  • [25] Toward an Efficient Uncertainty Quantification of Streamflow Predictions Using Sparse Polynomial Chaos Expansion
    Tran, Vinh Ngoc
    Kim, Jongho
    [J]. WATER, 2021, 13 (02)
  • [26] Uncertainty in hydrologic modeling: Toward an integrated data assimilation framework
    Liu, Yuqiong
    Gupta, Hoshin V.
    [J]. WATER RESOURCES RESEARCH, 2007, 43 (07)
  • [27] Uncertainty quantification of dynamic earthquake rupture simulations
    Daub, Eric G.
    Arabnejad, Hamid
    Mahmood, Imran
    Groen, Derek
    [J]. PHILOSOPHICAL TRANSACTIONS OF THE ROYAL SOCIETY A-MATHEMATICAL PHYSICAL AND ENGINEERING SCIENCES, 2021, 379 (2197):
  • [28] Stochastic approaches to uncertainty quantification in CFD simulations
    Mathelin, L
    Hussaini, MY
    Zang, TA
    [J]. NUMERICAL ALGORITHMS, 2005, 38 (1-3) : 209 - 236
  • [29] Uncertainty quantification of shock–bubble interaction simulations
    J. Jin
    X. Deng
    Y. Abe
    F. Xiao
    [J]. Shock Waves, 2019, 29 : 1191 - 1204
  • [30] Uncertainty Quantification (UQ) in generic MonteCarlo simulations
    Saracco, P.
    Batie, M.
    Hoff, G.
    Pia, M. G.
    [J]. 2012 IEEE NUCLEAR SCIENCE SYMPOSIUM AND MEDICAL IMAGING CONFERENCE RECORD (NSS/MIC), 2012, : 651 - 656