Quantification of predictive uncertainty with a metamodel: toward more efficient hydrologic simulations

被引:20
|
作者
Vinh Ngoc Tran [1 ,2 ]
Kim, Jongho [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Ulsan, Sch Civil & Environm Engn, Ulsan, South Korea
[2] VNU Univ Sci, Ctr Environm Fluid Dynam, Hanoi, Vietnam
关键词
Uncertainty quantification; Hydrologic prediction; Polynomial chaos expansion; Generalized likelihood uncertainty estimation; Sensitivity analysis; CHAIN MONTE-CARLO; GLOBAL SENSITIVITY-ANALYSIS; SEQUENTIAL DATA ASSIMILATION; POLYNOMIAL CHAOS EXPANSION; STOCHASTIC FINITE-ELEMENT; RAINFALL-RUNOFF MODELS; FORMAL BAYESIAN METHOD; PARAMETER UNCERTAINTY; SUBSURFACE FLOW; AUTOMATIC CALIBRATION;
D O I
10.1007/s00477-019-01703-0
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
Hydrologic flood prediction has been a quite complex and difficult task because of various sources of inherent uncertainty. Accurately quantifying these uncertainties plays a significant role in providing flood warnings and mitigating risk, but it is time-consuming. To offset the cost of quantifying the uncertainty, we adopted a highly efficient metamodel based on polynomial chaos expansion (PCE) theory and applied it to a lumped, deterministic rainfall-runoff model (NedbOr-AfstrOmnings model, NAM) combined with generalized likelihood uncertainty estimation (GLUE). The central conclusions are: (1) the subjective aspects of GLUE (e.g., the cutoff threshold values of likelihood function) are investigated for 8 flood events that occurred in the Thu bon river watershed in Vietnam, resulting that the values of 0.82 for Nash-Sutcliffe efficiency, 4.05% for peak error, and 4.35% for volume error are determined as the acceptance thresholds. Moreover, the number of ensemble behavioral sets required to maintain the sufficient range of uncertainty but to avoid any unnecessary computation was set to 500. (2) The number of experiment designs (N) and degree of polynomial (p) are key factors in estimating PCE coefficients, and values of N=50 and p=4 are preferred. (3) The results computed using a PCE model consisting of polynomial bases are as good as those given by the NAM, while the total times required for making an ensemble in the PCE model are approximately seventeen times faster. (4) Two parameters (CQOF and CK12) turned out to be most dominant based on a visual inspection of the posterior distribution and the mathematical computations of the Sobol' and Morris sensitivity analysis. Identification of the posterior parameter distributions from the calibration process helps to find the behavioral sets even faster. The unified framework that presents the most efficient ways of predicting flow regime and quantifying the uncertainty without deteriorating accuracy will ultimately be helpful for providing warnings and mitigating flood risk in a timely manner.
引用
收藏
页码:1453 / 1476
页数:24
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Quantification of predictive uncertainty with a metamodel: toward more efficient hydrologic simulations
    Vinh Ngoc Tran
    Jongho Kim
    [J]. Stochastic Environmental Research and Risk Assessment, 2019, 33 : 1453 - 1476
  • [2] Efficient uncertainty quantification in fully-integrated surface and subsurface hydrologic simulations
    Miller, K. L.
    Berg, S. J.
    Davison, J. H.
    Sudicky, E. A.
    Forsyth, P. A.
    [J]. ADVANCES IN WATER RESOURCES, 2018, 111 : 381 - 394
  • [3] Uncertainty Quantification of Hydrologic Model
    Vallam, P.
    Qin, X. S.
    Yu, J. J.
    [J]. 5TH INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE AND DEVELOPMENT - ICESD 2014, 2014, 10 : 219 - 223
  • [4] Improving the predictive capability of building simulations using uncertainty quantification
    Gorle, Catherine
    [J]. SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY FOR THE BUILT ENVIRONMENT, 2022, 28 (05) : 575 - 576
  • [5] METAMODEL UNCERTAINTY QUANTIFICATION BY USING BAYES' THEOREM
    Xiao, Mi
    Yao, Qiangzhuang
    Gao, Liang
    Xiong, Haihong
    Wang, Fengxiang
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL DESIGN ENGINEERING TECHNICAL CONFERENCES AND COMPUTERS AND INFORMATION IN ENGINEERING CONFERENCE, 2015, VOL 2B, 2016,
  • [6] Choosing a Metamodel of a Simulation Model for Uncertainty Quantification
    de Carvalho, Tiago M.
    van Rosmalen, Joost
    Wolff, Harold B.
    Koffijberg, Hendrik
    Coupe, Veerle M. H.
    [J]. MEDICAL DECISION MAKING, 2022, 42 (01) : 28 - 42
  • [7] An Efficient Polynomial Chaos Method for Uncertainty Quantification in Electromagnetic Simulations
    Shen, Jianxiang
    Chen, Ji
    [J]. 2010 IEEE ANTENNAS AND PROPAGATION SOCIETY INTERNATIONAL SYMPOSIUM, 2010,
  • [8] UNCERTAINTY QUANTIFICATION IN METAMODEL-BASED RELIABILITY PREDICTION
    Nannapaneni, Saideep
    Hu, Zhen
    Mahadevan, Sankaran
    [J]. PROCEEDINGS OF THE ASME INTERNATIONAL DESIGN ENGINEERING TECHNICAL CONFERENCES AND COMPUTERS AND INFORMATION IN ENGINEERING CONFERENCE, 2016, VOL 2B, 2016, : 265 - 275
  • [9] Uncertainty Quantification in Land Surface Hydrologic Modeling: Toward an Integrated Variational Data Assimilation Framework
    Abdolghafoorian, Abedeh
    Farhadi, Leila
    [J]. IEEE JOURNAL OF SELECTED TOPICS IN APPLIED EARTH OBSERVATIONS AND REMOTE SENSING, 2016, 9 (06) : 2628 - 2637
  • [10] UNCERTAINTY QUANTIFICATION IN TURBOMACHINERY SIMULATIONS
    Emory, Michael
    Iaccarino, Gianluca
    Laskowski, Gregory M.
    [J]. PROCEEDINGS OF THE ASME TURBO EXPO: TURBINE TECHNICAL CONFERENCE AND EXPOSITION, 2016, VOL 2C, 2016,