Have screening harms become newsworthy? News coverage of prostate and colorectal cancer screening since the 2008 USPSTF recommendation changes

被引:10
|
作者
Elstad, Emily A. [1 ,2 ]
Sheridan, Stacey L. [2 ,3 ]
Lee, Joseph G. L. [1 ]
Rini, Christine [1 ,4 ]
Earp, Jo Anne [1 ,4 ]
Brewer, Noel T. [1 ,2 ,4 ]
机构
[1] Univ N Carolina, Dept Hlth Behav, Chapel Hill, NC 27599 USA
[2] Cecil B Sheps Ctr Hlth Serv Res, Chapel Hill, NC USA
[3] Univ N Carolina, Dept Med, Chapel Hill, NC 27599 USA
[4] Univ N Carolina, Lineberger Comprehens Canc Ctr, Chapel Hill, NC 27599 USA
关键词
Cancer screening; Media; Prostate-specific antigen test; Colonoscopy; Newspaper article; RANDOMIZED PROSTATE; DECISION-MAKING; MEDIA; MORTALITY; IMPACT; RISK; CELEBRITY; SERVICES; DEATH;
D O I
10.1007/s10865-014-9572-7
中图分类号
B849 [应用心理学];
学科分类号
040203 ;
摘要
In 2008, the US Preventive Services Task Force updated its recommendations to discourage screening for prostate cancer in men over 75 and for colorectal cancer in adults over 85. We aimed to determine whether newspapers portrayed these screenings differently after these recommendation changes. A quantitative content analysis included articles on prostate-specific antigen (PSA) testing or colonoscopy in US newspapers from 2005 to 2012. Outcomes included the number of benefits and harms mentioned and the gist expert and lay readers might get from articles. Benefits in PSA articles (n = 222) and harms and benefits in colonoscopy articles (n = 65) did not change over time. Mentions of PSA harms increased after 2008 (p < .01). Expected expert gist of PSA articles became more negative after 2008 (p < .01). Expected lay gist was positive and did not change. News coverage of PSA testing harms increased without a decrease in the discussion of benefits. Consumers, especially lay consumers, are receiving unbalanced information on cancer screening.
引用
收藏
页码:1242 / 1251
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] How Have Breast Cancer Screening Intervals Changed Since the 2009 USPSTF Guideline Update?
    Wernli, K. J.
    Arao, R. F.
    Hubbard, R. A.
    Sprague, B. L.
    Alford-Teaster, J.
    Haas, J. S.
    Henderson, L.
    Hill, D.
    Lee, C., I
    Tosteson, A. N.
    Onega, T.
    CANCER EPIDEMIOLOGY BIOMARKERS & PREVENTION, 2016, 25 (03) : 558 - 558
  • [22] Effect of the USPSTF Grade D Recommendation against Screening for Prostate Cancer on Incident Prostate Cancer Diagnoses in the United States
    Barocas, Daniel A.
    Mallin, Katherine
    Graves, Amy J.
    Penson, David F.
    Palis, Bryan
    Winchester, David P.
    Chang, Sam S.
    JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2015, 194 (06): : 1587 - 1593
  • [23] Changes in prostate cancer survival among insured patients in relation to USPSTF screening recommendations
    Kim, Isaac E., Jr.
    Kim, Daniel D.
    Kim, Sinae
    Ma, Shuangge
    Jang, Thomas L.
    Singer, Eric A.
    Ghodoussipour, Saum
    Kim, Isaac Yi
    BMC UROLOGY, 2022, 22 (01)
  • [24] Changes in prostate cancer survival among insured patients in relation to USPSTF screening recommendations
    Isaac E. Kim
    Daniel D. Kim
    Sinae Kim
    Shuangge Ma
    Thomas L. Jang
    Eric A. Singer
    Saum Ghodoussipour
    Isaac Yi Kim
    BMC Urology, 22
  • [25] News Coverage of the American Cancer Society's Update to Colorectal Cancer Screening Guidelines
    Krigel, Anna
    Prasad, Vinay K.
    Lebwohl, Benjamin
    MAYO CLINIC PROCEEDINGS, 2020, 95 (03) : 617 - 618
  • [26] Association of the USPSTF Grade D Recommendation Against Prostate-Specific Antigen Screening With Prostate Cancer-Specific Mortality
    Burgess, Laura
    Aldrighetti, Christopher M.
    Ghosh, Anushka
    Niemierko, Andrzej
    Chino, Fumiko
    Huynh, Melissa J.
    Efstathiou, Jason A.
    Kamran, Sophia C.
    JAMA NETWORK OPEN, 2022, 5 (05)
  • [27] Clinician Response to the 2021 USPSTF Recommendation for Colorectal Cancer Screening in Average Risk Adults Aged 45-49 Years
    Powers, Joseph Carter
    Rothberg, Michael B.
    Kovach, Jeffrey D.
    Casacchia, Nicholas J.
    Stanley, Elizabeth
    Martinez, Kathryn A.
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF PREVENTIVE MEDICINE, 2025, 68 (02) : 264 - 271
  • [28] Increase in higher risk prostate cancer cases following new screening recommendation by the US Preventive Services Task Force (USPSTF).
    Hall, Matthew David
    Schultheiss, Timothy E.
    Farino, Ginamarie
    Wong, Jeffrey Y. C.
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 2015, 33 (07)
  • [29] DID PHYSICIANS ENGAGE PATIENTS IN SHARED DECISION MAKING ABOUT PROSTATE CANCER SCREENING IN THE ERA OF A USPSTF GRADE D RECOMMENDATION?
    Malo, Teri
    Ferrari, Renee M.
    Clark, Stephen
    Bird, Kim
    Brenner, Alison
    Reuland, Daniel
    MEDICAL DECISION MAKING, 2020, 40 (01) : E147 - E147
  • [30] Changes in Prostate Cancer Presentation Following the 2012 USPSTF Screening Statement: Observational Study in a Multispecialty Group Practice
    Joseph Presti
    Stacey Alexeeff
    Brandon Horton
    Stephanie Prausnitz
    Andrew L. Avins
    Journal of General Internal Medicine, 2020, 35 : 1368 - 1374