Post-Conflict Third-Party Affiliation in Chimpanzees: What's in it for the Third Party?

被引:39
|
作者
Koski, Sonja E. [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Sterck, Elisabeth H. M. [3 ]
机构
[1] Univ Cambridge, Dept Biol Anthropol, Leverhulme Ctr Human Evolutionary Studies, Cambridge CB2 1QH, England
[2] Univ Jyvaskyla, Ctr Excellence Evolutionary Res, Dept Biol & Environm Sci, SF-40351 Jyvaskyla, Finland
[3] Univ Utrecht, Dept Behav Biol, Utrecht, Netherlands
关键词
chimpanzee; Pan troglodytes; third-party affiliation; self-protection; empathy; conflict management; POSTCONFLICT AFFILIATION; CAPTIVE CHIMPANZEES; WILD CHIMPANZEES; RECONCILIATION; BEHAVIOR; CONSOLATION; BYSTANDERS; GORILLAS; STRESS; AGGRESSORS;
D O I
10.1002/ajp.20668
中图分类号
Q95 [动物学];
学科分类号
071002 ;
摘要
Affiliative behavior after conflicts between conflict participants and other group members is common in many primate species. The proposed functions for such triadic interactions are numerous, mostly concerning the benefit for the former conflict opponents. We investigated post-conflict third-party affiliation (TPA) in captive chimpanzees (Pan troglodytes) with the aim of assessing what the affiliating third parties may gain from affiliation. Specifically, we tested whether third-party-initiated affiliation protects the third parties from further aggression by conflict opponents. We found support for this "self-protection hypothesis," in that third parties selectively directed affiliation to those opponents who more often gave further aggression to them, and affiliation effectively decreased their chance of receiving aggression from these opponents. However, a subset of affiliation, provided to conflict victims by their own kin, appeared to not be self-protective and the function of it remained open. We conclude that chimpanzee third-party-initiated affiliation is a more ;heterogeneous behavior than thus far assumed. Am. J. Primatol. 71:409-418, 2009. (C) 2009 Wiley-Liss, Inc.
引用
收藏
页码:409 / 418
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Bias and the Effectiveness of Third-Party Conflict Management Mechanisms
    Gent, Stephen E.
    Shannon, Megan
    [J]. CONFLICT MANAGEMENT AND PEACE SCIENCE, 2011, 28 (02) : 124 - 144
  • [42] Survey on Dependency Conflict Problem of Third-party Libraries
    Li, Shuo
    Liu, Jie
    Wang, Shuai
    Tian, Hao-Xiang
    Ye, Dan
    [J]. Ruan Jian Xue Bao/Journal of Software, 2023, 34 (10): : 4636 - 4660
  • [43] Conflict of Interest in Third-Party Reviews: An Experimental Study
    Ham, Sung H.
    Koch, Ingrid
    Lim, Noah
    Wu, Jiabin
    [J]. MANAGEMENT SCIENCE, 2021, 67 (12) : 7535 - 7559
  • [44] Domestic uncertainty, third-party resolve, and international conflict
    DiLorenzo, Matthew
    Rooney, Bryan
    [J]. JOURNAL OF PEACE RESEARCH, 2018, 55 (04) : 445 - 459
  • [45] Three's company - Evaluating third-party intervention in intrastate conflict
    Carment, D
    Rowlands, D
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CONFLICT RESOLUTION, 1998, 42 (05) : 572 - 599
  • [47] Managing conflict: Third-party interventions for managers - Commentary
    Broedling, LA
    [J]. ACADEMY OF MANAGEMENT EXECUTIVE, 2002, 16 (01): : 154 - 155
  • [48] Third-Party Conflict Management and the Willingness to Make Concessions
    Beardsley, Kyle
    Lo, Nigel
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CONFLICT RESOLUTION, 2014, 58 (02) : 363 - 392
  • [49] Third-party trade, political similarity, and dyadic conflict
    Peterson, Timothy M.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF PEACE RESEARCH, 2011, 48 (02) : 185 - 200
  • [50] A Kantian system? Democracy and third-party conflict resolution
    Mitchell, SM
    [J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF POLITICAL SCIENCE, 2002, 46 (04) : 749 - 759