Robust and model-independent cosmological constraints from distance measurements

被引:43
|
作者
Zhai, Zhongxu [1 ]
Wang, Yun [1 ]
机构
[1] CALTECH, IPAC, Mail Code 314-6,1200 E Calif Blvd, Pasadena, CA 91125 USA
关键词
dark energy theory; cosmological parameters from CMBR; cosmological parameters from LSS; supernova type Ia - standard candles; BARYON ACOUSTIC-OSCILLATIONS; FLUX-AVERAGING ANALYSIS; DARK ENERGY; PARAMETER; SAMPLE;
D O I
10.1088/1475-7516/2019/07/005
中图分类号
P1 [天文学];
学科分类号
0704 ;
摘要
We present a systematic analysis of the cosmological constraints from the "Pantheon Sample" of 1048 Type Ia Supernovae (SNe Ia) in the redshift range 0.01 < z < 2.3 compiled by Scolnic et al. (2018). Applying the flux-averaging method for detecting unknown systematic effects, we find that the "Pantheon" sample has been well calibrated and the bias caused by unknown systematic errors has been minimized. We present the estimate of distances measured from SNe Ia and reconstruct the expansion history of the Universe. The results are in agreement with a simple cosmological constant model and reveals the possible improvements that future SN Ia observations from WFIRST and LSST can target. We have derived distance priors using the Cosmic Microwave Background (CMB) data from the Planck 2018 final data release, and combine them with SNe Ia and baryon acoustic oscillation (BAO) data, to explore the impact from the systematic errors of SNe Ia on the combined cosmological parameter constraints. Using the combined data set of SNe Ia, BAO, and CMB distance priors, we measure the dark energy density function X(z) = rho x(z)/rho x(0) as a free function (defined as a cubic spline of its values at z = 0.33, 0.67, 1.0), along with the cosmological parameters (Omega(k), Omega(m), Omega(b), H-0). We find no deviation from a flat Universe dominated by a cosmological constant (X(z) = 1), and H-0 = 68.4 +/- 0.9 km s(-1) Mpc(-1), straddling the Planck team's measurement of H-0 = 67.4 +/- 0.5 km s(-1) Mpc(-1), and Riess et al. (2018) measurement of H-0 = 73.52 +/- 1.62 km s(-1) Mpc(-1). Adding H-0 = 73.52 +/- 1.62 km s(-1) Mpc(-1) as a prior to the combined data set leads to the time dependence of the dark energy density at z similar to 0.33 at 68% confidence level. Not including the systematic errors on SNe Ia has a similar but larger effect on the dark energy density measurement.
引用
收藏
页数:23
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Model-independent constraints on Topcolor from R-b
    Burdman, G
    Kominis, D
    PHYSICS LETTERS B, 1997, 403 (1-2) : 101 - 107
  • [22] Testing the cosmological Poisson equation in a model-independent way
    Zheng, Ziyang
    Sakr, Ziad
    Amendola, Luca
    PHYSICS LETTERS B, 2024, 853
  • [23] A cosmological exclusion plot: towards model-independent constraints on modified gravity from current and future growth rate data
    Taddei, Laura
    Amendola, Luca
    JOURNAL OF COSMOLOGY AND ASTROPARTICLE PHYSICS, 2015, (02):
  • [24] Redshift drift cosmography for model-independent cosmological inference
    Heinesen, Asta
    PHYSICAL REVIEW D, 2021, 104 (12)
  • [25] Model-independent Constraints on Cosmic Curvature and Opacity
    Wang, Guo-Jian
    Wei, Jun-Jie
    Li, Zheng-Xiang
    Xia, Jun-Qing
    Zhu, Zong-Hong
    ASTROPHYSICAL JOURNAL, 2017, 847 (01):
  • [26] Model-independent constraints for effective Sivers function
    Teryaev, O. V.
    CZECHOSLOVAK JOURNAL OF PHYSICS, 2006, 56 : C135 - C141
  • [27] Model-independent superhedging under portfolio constraints
    Arash Fahim
    Yu-Jui Huang
    Finance and Stochastics, 2016, 20 : 51 - 81
  • [28] MODEL-INDEPENDENT GLOBAL CONSTRAINTS ON NEW PHYSICS
    BURGESS, CP
    GODFREY, S
    KONIG, H
    LONDON, D
    MAKSYMYK, I
    PHYSICAL REVIEW D, 1994, 49 (11): : 6115 - 6147
  • [29] Model-independent superhedging under portfolio constraints
    Fahim, Arash
    Huang, Yu-Jui
    FINANCE AND STOCHASTICS, 2016, 20 (01) : 51 - 81
  • [30] Cosmological model-independent measurement of cosmic curvature using distance sum rule with the help of gravitational waves
    Wang, Yan-Jin
    Qi, Jing-Zhao
    Wang, Bo
    Zhang, Jing-Fei
    Cui, Jing-Lei
    Zhang, Xin
    MONTHLY NOTICES OF THE ROYAL ASTRONOMICAL SOCIETY, 2022, 516 (04) : 5187 - 5195