A Curious History of Sunspot Penumbrae: An Update

被引:18
|
作者
Carrasco, V. M. S. [1 ]
Vaquero, J. M. [2 ,3 ]
Trigo, R. M. [4 ]
Gallego, M. C. [1 ,3 ]
机构
[1] Univ Extremadura, Dept Fis, E-06071 Badajoz, Spain
[2] Univ Extremadura, Dept Fis, Merida 06800, Spain
[3] Univ Extremadura, Inst Univ Invest Agua Cambio Climat & Sostenibili, Badajoz 06006, Spain
[4] Univ Lisbon, Fac Ciencias, IDL, P-1749016 Lisbon, Portugal
关键词
Sunspots; statistics; Sunspot; umbra; penumbrae; SOLAR-ACTIVITY; GREENWICH; CATALOG; RATIO; SUN;
D O I
10.1007/s11207-018-1328-z
中图分类号
P1 [天文学];
学科分类号
0704 ;
摘要
The ratio of penumbral to umbral area of sunspots is an important topic for solar and geophysical studies. Hathaway (Solar Phys. 286, 347, 2013) found a curious behaviour in this parameter for small sunspot groups (areas smaller than 100 millionths of solar hemisphere, msh) using records from Royal Greenwich Observatory (RGO). Hathaway showed that the penumbra-umbra ratio decreased smoothly from more than 7 in 1905 to lower than 3 by 1930 and then increased to almost 8 in 1961. Thus, Hathaway proposed the existence of a secular variation in the penumbra-umbra area ratio. In order to confirm that secular variation, we employ data of the sunspot catalogue published by the Coimbra Astronomical Observatory (COI) for the period 1929 - 1941. Our results disagree with the penumbra-umbra ratio found by Hathaway for that period. However, the behaviour of this ratio for large (areas greater or equal than 100 msh) and small groups registered in COI during 1929 - 1941 is similar to data available from RGO for the periods 1874 - 1914 and 1950 - 1976. Nevertheless, while the average values and time evolution of the ratio in large groups are similar those for small groups according to the Coimbra data (1929 - 1941) it is not analogous for RGO data for the same period. We also found that the behaviour of the penumbra-umbra area ratio for smaller groups in both observatories is significantly different. The main difference between the area measurements made in Coimbra and RGO is associated with the umbra measurements. We would like to stress that the two observatories used different methods of observation and while in COI both methodology and instruments did not change during the study period, some changes were carried out in RGO that could have affected measurements of umbra and penumbra. These facts illustrate the importance of the careful recovery of past solar data.
引用
收藏
页数:11
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Returning magnetic flux in sunspot penumbrae
    Cobo, B. Ruiz
    Ramos, A. Asensio
    ASTRONOMY & ASTROPHYSICS, 2013, 549
  • [22] LINE SHIFTS AND ASYMMETRIES IN SUNSPOT PENUMBRAE
    STELLMACHER, G
    WIEHR, E
    ASTRONOMY & ASTROPHYSICS, 1980, 82 (1-2) : 157 - 162
  • [23] Sunspot Penumbrae: Formation and Fine Structure
    Ryutova, Margarita
    Berger, Thomas
    Title, Alan
    SECOND HINODE SCIENCE MEETING: BEYOND DISCOVERY-TOWARD UNDERSTANDING, 2009, 415 : 361 - +
  • [24] Bipolar Magnetic Structures in Sunspot Penumbrae
    Dalda, A. Sainz
    Bellot Rubio, L. R.
    HINODE-3: THE 3RD HINODE SCIENCE MEETING, 2012, 454 : 221 - 224
  • [25] Recent evidence for convection in sunspot penumbrae
    Scharmer, G. B.
    PHYSICA SCRIPTA, 2008, T133
  • [26] On the fine structure and formation of sunspot penumbrae
    Ryutova, M.
    Berger, T.
    Title, A.
    ASTROPHYSICAL JOURNAL, 2008, 676 (02): : 1356 - 1366
  • [27] Peculiarity of the Oscillation Stratification in Sunspot Penumbrae
    Kolobov, D. Y.
    Chelpanov, A. A.
    Kobanov, N. I.
    SOLAR PHYSICS, 2016, 291 (11) : 3339 - 3347
  • [28] Recent Evidence for Convection in Sunspot Penumbrae
    Göran B. Scharmer
    Space Science Reviews, 2009, 144 : 229 - 247
  • [29] A GEOMETRICAL HEIGHT SCALE FOR SUNSPOT PENUMBRAE
    Puschmann, K. G.
    Ruiz Cobo, B.
    Martinez Pillet, V.
    ASTROPHYSICAL JOURNAL, 2010, 720 (02): : 1417 - 1431
  • [30] Polarimetry of sunspot penumbrae with high spatial resolution
    González, NB
    Okunev, OV
    Cerdeña, ID
    Kneer, F
    Puschmann, KG
    ASTRONOMY & ASTROPHYSICS, 2005, 434 (01): : 317 - 327