Patient Preferences for Diagnostic Testing in the Emergency Department: A Cross-sectional Study

被引:7
|
作者
Porath, Jonathan D. [1 ]
Meka, Arjun P. [1 ]
Morrow, Chelsea [1 ]
Iyengar, Rahul [1 ]
Shtull-Leber, Eytan [2 ]
Fagerlin, Angela [3 ,4 ]
Meurer, William J. [5 ,6 ]
机构
[1] Univ Michigan, Sch Med, Ann Arbor, MI USA
[2] Maricopa Integrated Hlth Syst, Dept Emergency Med, Phoenix, AZ USA
[3] Univ Utah, Dept Populat Hlth Sci, Salt Lake City, UT USA
[4] Dept Vet Affairs, Salt Lake City, UT USA
[5] Univ Michigan Hlth Syst, Dept Emergency Med, Ann Arbor, MI 48109 USA
[6] Univ Michigan Hlth Syst, Dept Neurol, Ann Arbor, MI 48109 USA
基金
美国国家卫生研究院;
关键词
SHARED DECISION-MAKING;
D O I
10.1111/acem.13404
中图分类号
R4 [临床医学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100602 ;
摘要
Background: Diagnostic testing is common during emergency department (ED) visits. Little is understood about patient preferences for such testing. We hypothesized that a patient's willingness to undergo diagnostic testing is influenced by the potential benefit, risk, and personal cost. Methods: We conducted a cross sectional survey among ED patients for diagnostic testing in two hypothetical scenarios: chest pain (CP) and mild traumatic brain injury (mTBI). Each scenario defined specific risks, benefits, and costs of testing. The odds of a participant desiring diagnostic testing were calculated using a series of nested multivariable logistic regression models. Results: Participants opted for diagnostic testing 68.2% of the time, including 69.7% of CP and 66.7% of all mTBI scenarios. In the CP scenario, 81% of participants desired free testing versus 59% when it was associated with a $100 copay (difference = 22%, 95% confidence interval [CI] = 16% to 28%). Similarly, in the mTBI scenario, 73% of adult participants desired free testing versus 56% when charged a $100 copayment (difference = 17%, 95% CI = 11% to 24%). Benefit and risk had mixed effects across the scenarios. In fully adjusted models, the association between cost and desire for testing persisted in the CP (odds ratio [OR] = 0.33, 95% CI = 0.23 to 0.47) and adult mTBI (OR = 0.47, 95% CI = 0.33 to 0.67) scenarios. Conclusions: In this ED-based study, patient preferences for diagnostic testing differed significantly across levels of risk, benefit, and cost of diagnostic testing. Cost was the strongest and most consistent factor associated with decreased desire for testing.
引用
收藏
页码:627 / 633
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Patient satisfaction, needs, and preferences concerning information dispensation at the emergency department: a cross-sectional observational study
    de Steenwinkel, Marank
    Haagsma, Juanita A.
    van Berkel, Esther C. M.
    Rozema, Lotte
    Rood, Pleunie P. M.
    Bouwhuis, Marna G.
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF EMERGENCY MEDICINE, 2022, 15 (01)
  • [2] Patient satisfaction, needs, and preferences concerning information dispensation at the emergency department: a cross-sectional observational study
    Marank de Steenwinkel
    Juanita A. Haagsma
    Esther C. M. van Berkel
    Lotte Rozema
    Pleunie P. M. Rood
    Marna G. Bouwhuis
    [J]. International Journal of Emergency Medicine, 2022, 15
  • [3] Patient preferences for emergency department-initiated tobacco interventions: a multicenter cross-sectional study of current smokers
    Esther K Choo
    Ashley F Sullivan
    Frank LoVecchio
    John N Perret
    Carlos A Camargo
    Edwin D Boudreaux
    [J]. Addiction Science & Clinical Practice, 7 (1)
  • [4] Patient preferences for emergency or planned hip fracture surgery: a cross-sectional study
    Aggarwal, Abhinav
    Harris, Ian A.
    Naylor, Justine M.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF ORTHOPAEDIC SURGERY AND RESEARCH, 2016, 11
  • [5] Patient preferences for emergency or planned hip fracture surgery: a cross-sectional study
    Abhinav Aggarwal
    Ian A. Harris
    Justine M. Naylor
    [J]. Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery and Research, 11
  • [6] Cross-sectional study on emergency department management of sepsis
    Hung, Kevin K. C.
    Lam, Rex P. K.
    Lo, Ronson S. L.
    Tenney, Justin W.
    Yang, Marc L. C.
    Tai, Marcus C. K.
    Graham, Colin A.
    [J]. HONG KONG MEDICAL JOURNAL, 2018, 24 (06) : 571 - 578
  • [7] The patient, the doctor and the emergency department: A cross-sectional study of patient-centredness in 1990 and 2005
    Dale, Jeremy
    Sandhu, Harbinder
    Lall, Ranjit
    Glucksman, Edward
    [J]. PATIENT EDUCATION AND COUNSELING, 2008, 72 (02) : 320 - 329
  • [8] Patient and doctor perspectives on HIV screening in the emergency department: A prospective cross-sectional study
    De Rossi, Noemy
    Dattner, Nicolas
    Cavassini, Matthias
    Peters, Solange
    Hugli, Olivier
    Darling, Katharine E. A.
    [J]. PLOS ONE, 2017, 12 (07):
  • [9] Diagnostic Radiation Exposure of Injury Patients in the Emergency Department: A Cross-Sectional Large Scaled Study
    You, Je Sung
    Lee, Hye-Jeong
    Chung, Yong Eun
    Lee, Hye Sun
    Kim, Myo Jeong
    Chung, Sung Phil
    Kim, Myeong-Jin
    Park, Incheol
    Kim, Ki Whang
    [J]. PLOS ONE, 2013, 8 (12):
  • [10] Execution of Diagnostic Testing Has a Stronger Effect on Emergency Department Crowding than Other Common Factors: A Cross-Sectional Study
    Kawano, Takahisa
    Nishiyama, Kei
    Hayashi, Hiroyuki
    [J]. PLOS ONE, 2014, 9 (10):