Patient preferences for emergency or planned hip fracture surgery: a cross-sectional study

被引:5
|
作者
Aggarwal, Abhinav [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Harris, Ian A. [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Naylor, Justine M. [1 ,2 ,3 ]
机构
[1] Liverpool Hosp, Dept Orthoped, Liverpool, NSW 2170, Australia
[2] Univ New South Wales, South West Sydney Clin Sch, Liverpool, NSW 2170, Australia
[3] Ingham Inst Appl Med Res, Whitlam Orthopaed Res Ctr, Level 2,1 Campbell St, Liverpool, NSW 2170, Australia
关键词
Patient preferences; Orthopaedic surgery; Hip fracture; SURGICAL FIXATION; 30-DAY MORTALITY; ELDERLY-PATIENTS; DECISION-MAKING; OPERATIVE DELAY; MORBIDITY; ASSOCIATION; STAY; ROOM;
D O I
10.1186/s13018-016-0454-2
中图分类号
R826.8 [整形外科学]; R782.2 [口腔颌面部整形外科学]; R726.2 [小儿整形外科学]; R62 [整形外科学(修复外科学)];
学科分类号
摘要
Background: The ideal timing of surgical management for hip fractures remains controversial. Currently, individual surgeon preference and departmental resources guide decision making regarding the use of emergency or planned operating lists for hip fracture surgery. We evaluated patient preference for emergency or planned surgery. Methods: 102 patients awaiting surgery for a hip fracture at a tertiary hospital were surveyed in this cross-sectional study. After being informed of the benefits and risks associated with an emergency or planned operation, the patients were asked to indicate a hypothetical preference for surgical operating time. They were then asked to give an importance value for six factors that may influence decision making including consultant supervision, operative timeliness, surgical cancellation, after hours operation, length of hospital stay and repeated fasting. For each factor, absolute importance was rated from 0 to 10, and factors were independently ranked for relative importance from 1 to 6. An open ended question was used to include any other factors they thought relevant to their hypothetical decision making. Results: Of the 102 patients surveyed, 95 patients (93 %) indicated that they preferred planned over emergency surgery. The most important influencing factor was the presence of specialist supervision (mean rating 9.4, mean rank 1.3) followed by avoidance of operative cancellation (mean rating 8.8, mean rank 2.3) and avoidance of after hours operations (mean rating 8.1, mean rank 3.2). A lower importance was attached to operative timeliness and avoiding prolonged fasting, with reduction in length of hospital stay being the least important variable. There was a direct correlation between absolute ratings and relative rankings independently assigned by patients to each factor. Conclusions: Patients with hip fractures prefer planned rather than emergency surgery, the presence of specialist supervision being the most important factor influencing their preference.
引用
收藏
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Patient preferences for emergency or planned hip fracture surgery: a cross-sectional study
    Abhinav Aggarwal
    Ian A. Harris
    Justine M. Naylor
    [J]. Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery and Research, 11
  • [2] Patient Preferences for Diagnostic Testing in the Emergency Department: A Cross-sectional Study
    Porath, Jonathan D.
    Meka, Arjun P.
    Morrow, Chelsea
    Iyengar, Rahul
    Shtull-Leber, Eytan
    Fagerlin, Angela
    Meurer, William J.
    [J]. ACADEMIC EMERGENCY MEDICINE, 2018, 25 (06) : 627 - 633
  • [3] Quality of Life After Hip Fracture Surgery in the Elderly: A Cross-Sectional Study
    Haddad, Bassem I.
    Abu Ali, Mohammad
    Alashkar, Oubaida
    Jamos, Dana
    Alnaser, Ibrahim
    Qambar, Osama
    Aburumman, Razan
    Altarawneh, Dergam
    Karam, Abdulrahman M.
    Alshrouf, Mohammad A.
    [J]. CUREUS JOURNAL OF MEDICAL SCIENCE, 2024, 16 (01)
  • [4] Patient Satisfaction in Emergency General Surgery: A Prospective Cross-Sectional Study
    Kinnear, Ned
    Herath, Matheesha
    Jolly, Samantha
    Han, Jennie
    Tran, Minh
    Parker, Dominic
    O'Callaghan, Michael
    Hennessey, Derek
    Dobbins, Christopher
    Sammour, Tarik
    Moore, James
    [J]. WORLD JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 2020, 44 (09) : 2950 - 2958
  • [5] Patient Satisfaction in Emergency General Surgery: A Prospective Cross-Sectional Study
    Ned Kinnear
    Matheesha Herath
    Samantha Jolly
    Jennie Han
    Minh Tran
    Dominic Parker
    Michael O’Callaghan
    Derek Hennessey
    Christopher Dobbins
    Tarik Sammour
    James Moore
    [J]. World Journal of Surgery, 2020, 44 : 2950 - 2958
  • [6] Hip Fracture and Cognitive Impairment: A cross-sectional study
    Manzanares Bracke, Nele
    [J]. REVISTA ECUATORIANA DE NEUROLOGIA, 2009, 18 (1-2): : 53 - 57
  • [7] A Cross-Sectional Study on Patient Preferences for Selecting Surgeons for Joint Replacement Surgery in India
    Prakash, Mrinal
    Hippalgaonkar, Kushal
    Reddy, Mv
    Seth, Aditya
    Jayakumar, Tarun
    Krishna, Buddhapuram Pranav
    Mulpur, Praharsha
    Reddy, A. V. Gurava
    [J]. CUREUS JOURNAL OF MEDICAL SCIENCE, 2024, 16 (07)
  • [8] Patient preferences for emergency departmentinitiated tobacco interventions: a multicenter cross-sectional study of current smokers
    Choo, Esther K.
    Sullivan, Ashley F.
    LoVecchio, Frank
    Perret, John N.
    Camargo, Carlos A., Jr.
    Boudreaux, Edwin D.
    [J]. ADDICTION SCIENCE & CLINICAL PRACTICE, 2012, 7
  • [9] Sarcopenia in patients with hip fracture: A multicenter cross-sectional study
    Steihaug, Ole Martin
    Gjesdal, Clara Gram
    Bogen, Bard
    Kristoffersen, Malfrid Holen
    Lien, Gunhild
    Ranhoff, Anette Hylen
    [J]. PLOS ONE, 2017, 12 (09):
  • [10] A Cross-Sectional Study of Bone Nanomechanics in Hip Fracture and Aging
    Stavri, Richard
    Tay, Tabitha
    Wiles, Crispin C. C.
    Di Federico, Erica
    Boughton, Oliver
    Ma, Shaocheng
    Karunaratne, Angelo
    Churchwell, John H. H.
    Bhattacharya, Rajarshi
    Terrill, Nicholas J. J.
    Cobb, Justin P. P.
    Hansen, Ulrich
    Abel, Richard L. L.
    [J]. LIFE-BASEL, 2023, 13 (06):