Hegel's political theology: "True Infinity', dialectical panentheism and social criticism

This article proposes that the foundations of Hegel's contribution to social criticism are compatible with, and enriched by, his meta-theology. His social critique is grounded in his belief that normative ideas - and especially the idea of freedom - are necessarily experiential and historical. Often regarded as a recipe for an authoritarian reconciliation with the status quo, Hegel's philosophy has been dismissed by some unsympathetic commentators from the left as inimical to the task of social criticism. Much of the reason for this has been the opinion that his systematic approach to philosophy is one underpinned by either a highly unorthodox theism or, more commonly, pantheism. Even scholars who wish to defend Hegel as a social critic have tended to abandon or at least massively downplay his meta-theology. In this article, I argue that it is precisely the emphasis on his original theo-metaphysics that offers a powerful and relevant contribution to social criticism. Hegel then becomes an important contributor, from the tradition of social criticism, to the growing trend in academia and wider society of rethinking the relationship between the religious and the secular, known as post-secularism. The proposition at the centre of his system - that human history and society are necessary moments in the process of divine self-understanding - is not new. But the specifics of Hegel's concept of God that I am proposing - and, moreover, their implications for his political thought - are new. I propose that Hegel was neither a theist nor a pantheist but, rather, a dialectical panentheist. According to panentheism, God is neither straightforwardly transcendent to nature and history (theism) nor immanently identifiable with nature and history (pantheism), but rather is dynamically and dialectically immanent in the ongoing processes of self-transcendence that are nature and history. If such an interpretation of Hegel's system is valid then the proposition that his political thought is an exercise in dialectical panentheistic theology is one that is worth making and defending because it has important things to say about his social critique.