A constrained reduced-order method for fast prediction of steady hypersonic flows

被引:12
|
作者
Cao, Changqiang [1 ]
Nie, Chunsheng [2 ]
Pan, Shucheng [1 ]
Cai, Jinsheng [1 ]
Qu, Kun [1 ]
机构
[1] Northwestern Polytech Univ, Sch Aeronaut, Xian 710072, Shaanxi, Peoples R China
[2] CALT, Sci & Technol Space Phys Lab, Beijing 100076, Peoples R China
基金
中国国家自然科学基金;
关键词
Proper orthogonal decomposition; Reduced-order model; Boundary constraints; Petrov-Galerkin projection; PROPER ORTHOGONAL DECOMPOSITION; NONLINEAR MODEL-REDUCTION; OPTIMIZATION; POD; SURROGATE; PROJECTION; DYNAMICS; STABILIZATION; TURBULENCE; FRAMEWORK;
D O I
10.1016/j.ast.2019.07.016
中图分类号
V [航空、航天];
学科分类号
08 ; 0825 ;
摘要
A constrained reduced order model (ROM) based on proper orthogonal decomposition (POD) is proposed to achieve fast and accurate prediction of steady hypersonic flows. The proposed method addresses the convergence issue of the projection-based POD ROM which violates the boundary conditions by using a constrained Gauss-Newton iterative process. The constraints in the iteration are formulated by satisfying the physical boundary conditions. To achieve this, a weighting matrix constructed by an improved Gauss weighting function is adopted to determine the contribution of each cell to the constraint term. The proposed constrained reduced-order method is accelerated by a parallel algorithm based on message passing interface (MIN) and load balancing, which makes the method practical for prediction of complex flows with large memory cost. Fast predictions of hypersonic flows over the two-dimensional cylindrical blunt body and the three-dimensional reentry vehicle using the constrained reduced-order method show that the error is significantly smaller than that of the interpolation-based POD ROM and the projection-based POD ROM. Computing efficiency is increased by 2 similar to 3 orders of magnitude compared to CFD. (C) 2019 Elsevier Masson SAS. All rights reserved.
引用
下载
收藏
页码:679 / 690
页数:12
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Reduced-order modeling of fluid flows with transformers
    Hemmasian, AmirPouya
    Farimani, Amir Barati
    PHYSICS OF FLUIDS, 2023, 35 (05)
  • [22] Reduced-order modeling for flutter prediction
    Pettit, CL
    Beran, PS
    COLLECTION OF THE 41ST AIAA/ASME/ASCE/AHS/ASC STRUCTURES, STRUCTURAL DYNAMICS, AND MATERIALS CONFERENCE AND EXHIBIT, VOL 1 PTS 1-3, 2000, : 773 - 783
  • [23] Study on a POD reduced-order model for steady-state flows in fractured porous media
    Li, Tingyu
    Han, Dongxu
    Yu, Bo
    Li, Jingfa
    Sun, Dongliang
    INTERNATIONAL COMMUNICATIONS IN HEAT AND MASS TRANSFER, 2020, 112
  • [24] Efficient reduced-order aerodynamic modeling for fast prediction of transonic flutter boundary
    Liu H.
    Gao X.
    Huang R.
    International Journal of Dynamics and Control, 2020, 8 (4) : 1080 - 1088
  • [25] Fast prediction of indoor pollutant dispersion based on reduced-order ventilation models
    Shi-Jie Cao
    Johan Meyers
    Building Simulation, 2015, 8 : 415 - 420
  • [26] Interpolation-based reduced-order modelling for steady transonic flows via manifold learning
    Franz, T.
    Zimmermann, R.
    Goertz, S.
    Karcher, N.
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF COMPUTATIONAL FLUID DYNAMICS, 2014, 28 (3-4) : 106 - 121
  • [27] Fast prediction of indoor pollutant dispersion based on reduced-order ventilation models
    Cao, Shi-Jie
    Meyers, Johan
    BUILDING SIMULATION, 2015, 8 (04) : 415 - 420
  • [28] Parametric reduced-order modeling of unsteady aerodynamics for hypersonic vehicles
    Chen, Zhiqiang
    Zhao, Yonghui
    Huang, Rui
    AEROSPACE SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY, 2019, 87 : 1 - 14
  • [29] Reduced-Order Aerothermoelastic Framework for Hypersonic Vehicle Control Simulation
    Falkiewicz, Nathan J.
    Cesnik, Carlos E. S.
    Crowell, Andrew R.
    McNamara, Jack J.
    AIAA JOURNAL, 2011, 49 (08) : 1625 - 1646
  • [30] Reduced-order models for radiative heat transfer of hypersonic vehicles
    Yan, Xiaoxuan
    Han, Jinglong
    Yun, Haiwei
    Chen, Xiaomao
    PROCEEDINGS OF THE INSTITUTION OF MECHANICAL ENGINEERS PART G-JOURNAL OF AEROSPACE ENGINEERING, 2020, 234 (11) : 1836 - 1848