Censoring political opposition online: Who does it and why

被引:21
|
作者
Ashokkumar, Ashwini [1 ]
Talaifar, Sanaz [1 ]
Fraser, William T. [1 ]
Landabur, Rodrigo [2 ]
Buhrmester, Michael [3 ]
Gomez, Angel [4 ]
Paredes, Borja [5 ]
Swann, William B., Jr. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Texas Austin, Dept Psychol, 108 E Dean Keeton, Austin, TX 78712 USA
[2] Univ Chile, Dept Psychol, Ignacio Carrera Pinto 1045, Nunoa, Region Metropol, Chile
[3] Univ Oxford, Inst Cognit & Evolutionary Anthropol, 51-53 Banbury Rd, Oxford OX2 6PE, England
[4] Fac Psicol UNED, Dept Social & Org Psychol, C Juan del Rosal 10, Madrid 28040, Spain
[5] Univ Complutense Madrid, Dept Commun Theories & Anal, Fac Ciencias Informac, Ave Complutense 3, Madrid 28040, Spain
基金
美国国家科学基金会; 欧洲研究理事会;
关键词
Censorship; Selective censoring; Identity politics; Moderators; Identity fusion; Social media; SELECTIVE EXPOSURE; IDENTITY FUSION; ATTITUDES; COMMUNICATION; ATTRACTION; PERCEPTION; CENSORSHIP; STRENGTH; CONTEXT; MEDIA;
D O I
10.1016/j.jesp.2020.104031
中图分类号
B84 [心理学];
学科分类号
04 ; 0402 ;
摘要
As ordinary citizens increasingly moderate online forums, blogs, and their own social media feeds, a new type of censoring has emerged wherein people selectively remove opposing political viewpoints from online contexts. In three studies of behavior on putative online forums, supporters of a political cause (e.g., abortion or gun rights) preferentially censored comments that opposed their cause. The tendency to selectively censor cause-incongruent online content was amplified among people whose cause-related beliefs were deeply rooted in or "fused with" their identities. Moreover, six additional identity-related measures also amplified the selective censoring effect. Finally, selective censoring emerged even when opposing comments were inoffensive and courteous. We suggest that because online censorship enacted by moderators can skew online content consumed by millions of users, it can systematically disrupt democratic dialogue and subvert social harmony.
引用
收藏
页数:15
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Why Does Political Science Hate American Indians?
    Ferguson, Kennan
    PERSPECTIVES ON POLITICS, 2016, 14 (04) : 1029 - 1038
  • [42] Sexual Minorities who Reject an LGB Identity: Who Are They and Why Does It Matter?
    Rosik, Christopher H.
    Lefevor, G. Tyler
    Beckstead, A. Lee
    ISSUES IN LAW & MEDICINE, 2021, 36 (01) : 27 - 43
  • [43] Mobilization Under Threat: Emotional Appeals and Pro-Opposition Political Participation Online
    Lauren E. Young
    Political Behavior, 2023, 45 : 445 - 468
  • [44] Mobilization Under Threat: Emotional Appeals and Pro-Opposition Political Participation Online
    Young, Lauren E.
    POLITICAL BEHAVIOR, 2023, 45 (02) : 445 - 468
  • [45] Who doesn't read online consumer reviews, and why?
    Camilleri, Adrian R.
    PERSONALITY AND INDIVIDUAL DIFFERENCES, 2021, 179
  • [46] WHO READS WEIGHT LOSS BLOGS AND WHY? AN ONLINE SURVEY
    Evans, Martinus M.
    Faghri, Pouran D.
    Pagoto, Sherry L.
    Schneider, Kristin L.
    Waring, Molly E.
    Whited, Matthew C.
    Appelhans, Bradley M.
    ANNALS OF BEHAVIORAL MEDICINE, 2014, 47 : S74 - S74
  • [47] Why Keep Arguing? Predicting Engagement in Political Conversations Online
    Shugars, Sarah
    Beauchamp, Nicholas
    SAGE OPEN, 2019, 9 (01):
  • [48] Who Does What in a Massive Open Online Course?
    Seaton, Daniel T.
    Bergner, Yoav
    Chuang, Isaac
    Mitros, Piotr
    Pritchard, David E.
    COMMUNICATIONS OF THE ACM, 2014, 57 (04) : 58 - 65
  • [49] Why do people share political information and misinformation online?
    Perach, Rotem
    Joyner, Laura
    Husbands, Deborah
    Buchanan, Tom
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF PSYCHOLOGY OPEN, 2023, 82 : 384 - 384
  • [50] Measuring “Who is a Jew?” Why It Matters in Jewish Political Behavior
    Wald K.D.
    Martinez M.D.
    Contemporary Jewry, 2022, 42 (3-4) : 357 - 383