Visual Acuity, Quality of Vision, and Patient-Reported Outcomes After Bilateral Implantation with a Trifocal or Extended Depth of Focus Intraocular Lens

被引:13
|
作者
Tran, Dan B. [1 ]
Owyang, Ashley [1 ]
Hwang, Jin [1 ]
Potvin, Richard [2 ]
机构
[1] Coastal Vis Med Grp, 293 S Main St,Suite 100, Orange, CA 92868 USA
[2] Sci Vis, Bend, OR USA
来源
CLINICAL OPHTHALMOLOGY | 2021年 / 15卷
关键词
trifocal IOL; EDOF IOL; presbyopia correction; cataract surgery; extended depth of focus; SATISFACTION; PERFORMANCE; RANGE;
D O I
10.2147/OPTH.S295503
中图分类号
R77 [眼科学];
学科分类号
100212 ;
摘要
Purpose: To evaluate the visual acuity, quality of vision and patient reported outcomes for patients that were either bilaterally implanted with a trifocal intraocular lens (IOL) or an extended depth of focus (EDOF) IOL. Design: Single site, prospective, non-interventional, masked, two-arm comparative study. Methods: Subjects who had prior uncomplicated cataract surgery with bilateral implantation of one of the lenses above were evaluated. Subjects in each group were assessed during a single visit. The uncorrected and best distance-corrected binocular near (40 cm), intermediate (60 cm), and distance visual acuity (VA) were measured, along with a spectacle independence questionnaire, a quality of vision questionnaire and contrast sensitivity measured in both mesopic and photopic conditions. Results: The study included 23 EDOF and 25 trifocal subjects. Binocular Uncorrected VAs were similar at distance and intermediate, but about 1.5 lines better at near with the trifocal (p < 0.001). Binocular best corrected distance - VA was significantly better with the EDOF lens (0.5 lines, p < 0.001), though the mean VA was better than 20/20 in both groups. Distance-corrected intermediate and near VA were significantly better with the trifocal IOL (1 line and 1.5 lines respectively, p < 0.001). Significantly more trifocal subjects had 20/25 or better VA at all three test distances (64% vs 4%, p<0.001). Patient reported spectacle independence was significantly higher in the trifocal group, driven primarily by differences in near vision. Mesopic and photopic binocular contrast sensitivity, satisfaction and subjective quality of vision scores were similar between groups. Conclusion: The trifocal IOL provided significantly better near vision (1.5 lines) with slightly worse distance vision (0.5 lines), while providing similar contrast sensitivity and visual quality. It may be the preferred choice for patients desiring more spectacle independence.
引用
收藏
页码:403 / 412
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Comparative Evaluation of Visual Outcomes After Bilateral Implantation of a Diffractive Trifocal Intraocular Lens and an Extended Depth of Focus Intraocular Lens
    Singh, Bhupesh
    Sharma, Sourabh
    Dadia, Suchit
    Bharti, Neha
    Bharti, Sudhank
    EYE & CONTACT LENS-SCIENCE AND CLINICAL PRACTICE, 2020, 46 (05): : 314 - 318
  • [2] Visual performance and patient preference with bilateral implantation of an extended depth of focus or combined implantation of an extended depth of focus/trifocal intraocular lens
    Moore, Jonathan
    Ostergaard, Jens
    Kretz, Florian
    INTERNATIONAL OPHTHALMOLOGY, 2024, 44 (01)
  • [3] Visual and patient-reported factors leading to satisfaction after implantation of diffractive extended depth-of-focus and trifocal intraocular lenses
    Lwowski, Christoph
    Pawlowicz, Katarzyna
    Petermann, Kerstin
    Hemkeppler, Eva
    Hinzelmann, Lisa
    Boehm, Myriam
    Kohnen, Thomas
    JOURNAL OF CATARACT AND REFRACTIVE SURGERY, 2022, 48 (04): : 421 - 428
  • [4] Evaluation of Visual and Patient-Reported Outcomes, Spectacle Dependence after Bilateral Implantation with a Non-Diffractive Extended Depth of Focus Intraocular Lens Compared to Other Intraocular Lenses
    Dolowiec-Kwapisz, Anna
    Piotrowska, Halina
    Misiuk-Hojlo, Marta
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL MEDICINE, 2022, 11 (17)
  • [5] VISUAL AND QUALITY OUTCOMES FOLLOWING BILATERAL IMPLANTATION OF A TRIFOCAL INTRAOCULAR LENS
    Bhatt, Uday
    Wolffsohn, James
    Sheppard, Amy
    Shah, Sunil
    CLINICAL AND EXPERIMENTAL OPHTHALMOLOGY, 2014, 42 : 74 - 74
  • [6] Comparing Visual Acuity, Low Contrast Acuity and Contrast Sensitivity After Trifocal Toric and Extended Depth of Focus Toric Intraocular Lens Implantation
    Gundersen, Kjell G.
    Potvin, Rick
    CLINICAL OPHTHALMOLOGY, 2020, 14 : 1071 - 1078
  • [7] Visual outcomes after bilateral trifocal diffractive intraocular lens implantation
    Carballo-Alvarez, Jesus
    Vazquez-Molini, Jose M.
    Sanz-Fernandez, Juan C.
    Garcia-Bella, Javier
    Polo, Vicente
    Garcia-Feijoo, Julian
    Martinez-de-la-Casa, Jose M.
    BMC OPHTHALMOLOGY, 2015, 15
  • [8] Visual outcomes after bilateral trifocal diffractive intraocular lens implantation
    Jesús Carballo-Alvarez
    Jose M Vazquez-Molini
    Juan C Sanz-Fernandez
    Javier Garcia-Bella
    Vicente Polo
    Julián García-Feijoo
    Jose M Martinez-de-la-Casa
    BMC Ophthalmology, 15
  • [9] Comparison of visual outcomes after bilateral implantation of extended range of vision and trifocal intraocular lenses
    Ruiz-Mesa, Ramon
    Abengozar-Vela, Antonio
    Aramburu, Ana
    Ruiz-Santos, Maria
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF OPHTHALMOLOGY, 2017, 27 (04) : 460 - 465
  • [10] Visual Outcomes, Visual Quality and Patient Satisfaction: Comparing a Blended Bifocal Approach to Bilateral Extended Depth of Focus Intraocular Lens Implantation
    Hammond, Matthew D.
    Potvin, Richard
    CLINICAL OPHTHALMOLOGY, 2019, 13 : 2325 - 2332