A Comparison of Performance Characteristics of Multistage Thermoelectric Coolers Based on Different Ceramic Substrates

被引:7
|
作者
Semenyuk, V. [1 ]
机构
[1] Thermion Co, UA-65009 Odessa, Ukraine
关键词
Cascade thermoelectric cooler; ceramic substrate; theoretical model; maximum temperature difference;
D O I
10.1007/s11664-013-2777-7
中图分类号
TM [电工技术]; TN [电子技术、通信技术];
学科分类号
0808 ; 0809 ;
摘要
The influence of the thermal properties of the substrate on the performance of cascade thermoelectric coolers (TECs) is studied with an emphasis on a justified choice of substrate material. An analytical model is developed for predicting the thermal resistance of the substrate associated with three-dimensional heat transfer from a smaller cascade area into a larger cooling cascade. The model is used to define the maximum temperature difference for a line of standard multistage TECs based on various substrate materials with different thermal conductivities, including white 96% Al2O3 "Rubalit" ceramic, grey 99.8% Al2O3 "Policor" ceramic, and AlN and BeO ceramics. Two types of multistage TECs are considered, namely with series and series-parallel connection of TE pellets, having from two to five cascades with TE pellet length in the range from 0.3 mm to 2 mm. A comparative analysis of the obtained results is made, and recommendations are formulated concerning the selection of an appropriate substrate material providing the highest performance-to-cost ratio.
引用
收藏
页码:1539 / 1547
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Thermal performance characteristics comparison between flip-chip and wirebond ceramic multichip modules
    Yuan, TD
    1996 IEEE MULTI-CHIP MODULE CONFERENCE, PROCEEDINGS, 1996, : 44 - 48
  • [32] Leucocitary alpha-glucosidase performance in Pompe patients and normal controls: A comparison of different substrates
    Uribe, Alfredo
    Moreno, Patricia
    Gamba, John
    MOLECULAR GENETICS AND METABOLISM, 2019, 126 (02) : S146 - S146
  • [33] Effect of Different Ceramic Waste Powder on Characteristics of Fly Ash-Based Geopolymer
    Herbudiman, Bernardinus
    Subari, Subari
    Nugraha, Bactiar
    Pratiwi, Indah
    Rinovian, Asnan
    Widyaningsih, Euneke
    Yanti, Evi Dwi
    Erlangga, Bagus D.
    Jakah, Jakah
    Roseno, Seto
    CIVIL ENGINEERING JOURNAL-TEHRAN, 2024, 10 (02): : 431 - 443
  • [34] Performance comparison investigation on solar photovoltaic-thermoelectric generation and solar photovoltaic-thermoelectric cooling hybrid systems under different conditions
    Wu, Shuang-Ying
    Zhang, Yi-Chen
    Xiao, Lan
    Shen, Zu-Guo
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF SUSTAINABLE ENERGY, 2018, 37 (06) : 533 - 548
  • [35] Electrical Characteristics and Short Channel Performance Comparison of Different Gate Junctionless Transistors
    Sahu, Chitrakant
    Singh, Jawar
    Kondekar, P. N.
    2013 INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON CONTROL, AUTOMATION, ROBOTICS AND EMBEDDED SYSTEMS (CARE-2013), 2013,
  • [36] Comparison of the electrochemichal performance of carbon produced from sepiolite with different surface characteristics
    Sandí, G
    Joachin, H
    Lub, WQ
    Prakash, J
    Tassara, G
    JOURNAL OF NEW MATERIALS FOR ELECTROCHEMICAL SYSTEMS, 2003, 6 (02) : 75 - 80
  • [37] COMPARISON OF THE PERFORMANCE OF DIFFERENT SOLAR RECEIVERS BASED ON THEIR GEOMETRY AND DIMENSIONS
    Karimi, Samane
    Torabi, Amir
    Ghasemi, Behzad
    Raisi, Afrasiab
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF POWER AND ENERGY SYSTEMS, 2024, 44 (10):
  • [38] Performance comparison of different wind generator based hybrid systems
    Courtecuisse, Vincent
    Robyns, Benoit
    Petit, Marc
    Francois, Bruno
    Deuse, Jacques
    2008 13TH INTERNATIONAL POWER ELECTRONICS AND MOTION CONTROL CONFERENCE, VOLS 1-5, 2008, : 2184 - +
  • [39] Comparison of Operational Performance and Bead Characteristics when Welding with Different Tubular Wires
    Diniz Starling, Cicero Murta
    Modenesi, Paulo Jose
    Donizete Borba, Tadeu Messias
    SOLDAGEM & INSPECAO, 2009, 14 (01): : 10 - 25
  • [40] Comparison and Evaluation of Satellite Performance Based on Different Clock Products
    Zheng, Jie
    Guo, Meijun
    Xiong, Chao
    Xiao, Yun
    CHINA SATELLITE NAVIGATION CONFERENCE (CSNC) 2017, VOL I, 2017, 437 : 574 - 587