Comparison between experimental methods for evaluating the compressive strength of existing masonry buildings

被引:31
|
作者
Sassoni, Enrico [1 ,3 ]
Mazzotti, Claudio [2 ,3 ]
Pagliai, Giulia [2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Bologna, Dept Civil Chem Environm & Mat Engn, I-40131 Bologna, Italy
[2] Univ Bologna, Dept Civil Chem Environm & Mat Engn, I-40136 Bologna, Italy
[3] Univ Bologna, Ctr Interdipartimentale Ric Ind CIRI Edilizia & C, I-40131 Bologna, Italy
关键词
Masonry cores; Seismic vulnerability; Cultural heritage; Compressive strength; Moderately destructive tests; Brick anisotropy; Mortar characterization; Double punch test; Mercury intrusion porosimetry; Digital image correlation; HISTORIC MASONRIES; CORES;
D O I
10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2014.06.070
中图分类号
TU [建筑科学];
学科分类号
0813 ;
摘要
In this study, the suitability of determining masonry compressive strength by using the following two moderately destructive techniques was evaluated: (i) testing bricks and mortar, separately, and then using formulas available in literature for calculating masonry compressive strength; (ii) testing cylindrical cores, completed with cement mortar castings above and beneath the core, according to a procedure recently proposed by the authors. Two sets of masonry specimens were purposely constructed in laboratory conditions, using bricks and mortar with different mechanical characteristics. From the results of the study, an evaluation of the reliability of the two testing techniques was possible. (C) 2014 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:206 / 219
页数:14
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Comparison of earthquake risk for masonry and RC buildings in Barcelona using existing sets of vulnerability functions
    Salgado-Galvez, Mario A.
    Momin, Samar
    Grajales, Sthefania
    Carreno, Martha Liliana
    BULLETIN OF EARTHQUAKE ENGINEERING, 2024, 22 (02) : 639 - 664
  • [42] An empirical model for compressive strength of the limestone masonry based on number of courses - An experimental study
    Verissimo-Anacleto, Jorge
    Ludovico-Marques, Marco
    Neto, Pedro
    CONSTRUCTION AND BUILDING MATERIALS, 2020, 258
  • [43] COMPARISON OF DIFFERENT METHODS FOR VISCOUS DAMPER PLACEMENT IN EXISTING FRAME BUILDINGS
    Landi, Luca
    Conti, Filippo
    Diotallevi, Pier Paolo
    IMPLEMENTING INNOVATIVE IDEAS IN STRUCTURAL ENGINEERING AND PROJECT MANAGEMENT, 2015, : 275 - 280
  • [44] Bracing systems in masonry buildings Part 2: Structural analysis methods in comparison
    Sommerlade, Kai
    Seim, Werner
    MAUERWERK, 2016, 20 (05) : 364 - 368
  • [45] EXPERIMENTAL STUDY ON COMPRESSIVE STRENGTH AND SHEAR STRENGTH OF MASONRY UNIT WITH FIBER GLASS AND POLYPROPYLENE FIBER PAINT COATING
    Juliafad, Eka
    Restu, Lisyana Junelin
    Yusmar, Fajri
    Putra, Rusnardi Rahmat
    Meguro, Kimiro
    JURNAL TEKNOLOGI-SCIENCES & ENGINEERING, 2024, 86 (06): : 85 - 93
  • [46] Comparison of artificial intelligence methods for predicting compressive strength of concrete
    Cihan, Mehmet Timur
    GRADEVINAR, 2021, 73 (06): : 617 - 632
  • [47] Probabilistic Model for Long-Term Time-Dependent Compressive Strength of Concrete in Existing Buildings
    Gao, Xiangling
    Li, Jie
    Ren, Xiaodan
    JOURNAL OF PERFORMANCE OF CONSTRUCTED FACILITIES, 2018, 32 (05)
  • [48] Experimental behavior of lintels for AAC masonry buildings: Comparison among different solutions
    Ferretti, Daniele
    Cerioni, Roberto
    Riva, Andrea
    Boretti, Giovanbattista
    Casillo, Alfredo
    Michelini, Elena
    ce/papers, 2023, 6 (02) : 161 - 169
  • [49] The improvement of spandrels in existing masonry buildings in order to avoid brittle failure: Experimental campaign on reinforced specimens
    Calderoni, B.
    Cordasco, E. A.
    Pacella, G.
    BRICK AND BLOCK MASONRY: TRENDS, INNOVATIONS AND CHALLENGES, 2016, : 1457 - 1467
  • [50] Correction: Comparison of earthquake risk for masonry and RC buildings in Barcelona using existing sets of vulnerability functions
    Mario A. Salgado-Gálvez
    Samar Momin
    Sthefanía Grajales
    Martha Liliana Carreño
    Bulletin of Earthquake Engineering, 2024, 22 : 665 - 665