Breast-Conserving Therapy for Triple-Negative Breast Cancer

被引:66
|
作者
Gangi, Alexandra [1 ]
Chung, Alice [1 ]
Mirocha, James [2 ]
Liou, Douglas Z. [1 ]
Leong, Trista [3 ]
Giuliano, Armando E. [1 ]
机构
[1] Cedars Sinai Med Ctr, Dept Surg, Los Angeles, CA 90048 USA
[2] Cedars Sinai Med Ctr, Dept Biostat, Los Angeles, CA 90048 USA
[3] Cedars Sinai Med Ctr, Dept Hlth Informat, Los Angeles, CA 90048 USA
关键词
LOCOREGIONAL RECURRENCE; CARCINOMA; RADIATION; RECEPTOR; SUBTYPE; METASTASIS; PATTERNS; SURGERY; RELAPSE; RISK;
D O I
10.1001/jamasurg.2013.3037
中图分类号
R61 [外科手术学];
学科分类号
摘要
IMPORTANCE The aggressive triple-negative phenotype of breast cancer (negative for estrogen and progesterone receptors and v-erb-b2 avian erythroblastic leukemia viral oncogene homolog 2 [ERBB2] [formerly human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2)]) is considered by some investigators to be a relative contraindication to breast-conserving therapy. OBJECTIVES To compare outcomes of breast-conserving therapy for patients with triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC) with those of patients with the luminal A, luminal B, and ERBB2 subtypes. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS Prospective database review at an academic tertiary medical center with a designated breast cancer center. We included 1851 consecutive patients ages 29 to 85 years with stages I to III invasive breast cancer who underwent breast-conserving therapy at a single institution from January 1, 2000, through May 30, 2012. Of these patients, 234 (12.6%) had TNBC; 1341 (72.4%), luminal A subtype; 212 (11.5%), luminal B subtype; and 64 (3.5%), ERBB2-enriched subtype. EXPOSURE Breast-conserving therapy. MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES The primary outcome measure was local recurrence (LR). Secondary outcome measures included regional recurrence, distant recurrence, and overall survival. RESULTS Triple-negative breast cancer was associated with younger age at diagnosis (56 vs 60 years; P = .001), larger tumors (2.1 vs 1.8 cm; P < .001), more stage II vs I cancer (42.1% vs 33.6%; P = .005), and more G3 tumors (86.4% vs 28.4%; P < .001) compared with the non-TNBC subtypes. Multivariable analysis showed that TNBC did not have a significantly increased risk of LR compared with the luminal A (hazard ratio, 1.4 [95% CI, 0.6-3.3]; P = .43), luminal B (1.6 [0.5-5.2]; P = .43), and ERBB2 (1.1 [0.2-5.2]; P = .87) subtypes. Only tumor size was a significant predictor of LR (hazard ratio, 4.7 [95% CI, 1.6-14.3]; P = .006). Predictors of worse overall survival included tumor size, grade, and stage and TNBC subtype. CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE Breast-conserving therapy for TNBC is not associated with increased LR compared with non-TNBC subtypes. However, the TNBC phenotype correlates with worse overall survival. Breast-conserving therapy is appropriate for patients with TNBC.
引用
收藏
页码:252 / 258
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] The Negative Effect of Triple-Negative Breast Cancer on Outcome after Breast-Conserving Therapy
    Zaky, Sandra S.
    Lund, MaryJo
    May, Kelly A.
    Godette, Karen D.
    Beitler, Jonathan J.
    Holmes, Leslie R.
    O'Regan, Ruth M.
    Yu, Esther S.
    Yu, David S.
    Landry, Jerome C.
    [J]. ANNALS OF SURGICAL ONCOLOGY, 2011, 18 (10) : 2858 - 2865
  • [2] The Negative Effect of Triple-Negative Breast Cancer on Outcome after Breast-Conserving Therapy
    Sandra S. Zaky
    MaryJo Lund
    Kelly A. May
    Karen D. Godette
    Jonathan J. Beitler
    Leslie R. Holmes
    Ruth M. O’Regan
    Esther S. Yu
    David S. Yu
    Jerome C. Landry
    [J]. Annals of Surgical Oncology, 2011, 18 : 2858 - 2865
  • [3] Breast-Conserving Therapy vs Total Mastectomy in Triple-Negative Breast Cancer
    Eastman, Amy
    Tammaro, Yolanda
    Andrews, Valerie
    Euhus, David
    Huth, James
    Leitch, Marilyn
    Moldrem, Amy
    Rao, Roshni
    [J]. ANNALS OF SURGICAL ONCOLOGY, 2012, 19 : 44 - 44
  • [4] Breast-Conserving Surgery in Triple-Negative Breast Cancer: A Retrospective Cohort Study
    Zhang, Hengle
    Wang, Zunyi
    Liu, Wei
    Wang, Peng
    Zhang, Xiaoyu
    [J]. EVIDENCE-BASED COMPLEMENTARY AND ALTERNATIVE MEDICINE, 2023, 2023
  • [5] Outcomes of Triple-Negative Versus Non-Triple-Negative Breast Cancers Managed with Breast-Conserving Therapy
    Bhatti, Abu Bakar Hafeez
    Khan, Amina Iqbal
    Siddiqui, Neelam
    Muzaffar, Nargis
    Syed, Aamir Ali
    Shah, Mazhar Ali
    Jamshed, Arif
    [J]. ASIAN PACIFIC JOURNAL OF CANCER PREVENTION, 2014, 15 (06) : 2577 - 2581
  • [6] Local Treatment of Triple-Negative Breast Cancer: Is Mastectomy Superior to Breast-Conserving Surgery?
    Di Leone, Alba
    Franco, Antonio
    Zotta, Francesca
    Scardina, Lorenzo
    Sicignano, Margherita
    Di Guglielmo, Enrico
    Castagnetta, Virginia
    Magno, Stefano
    Terribile, Daniela
    Sanchez, Alejandro Martin
    Franceschini, Gianluca
    Masetti, Riccardo
    [J]. JOURNAL OF PERSONALIZED MEDICINE, 2023, 13 (05):
  • [7] Locoregional Recurrence of Triple-negative Breast Cancer After Breast-conserving Surgery and Radiation
    Freedman, Gary M.
    Anderson, Penny R.
    Li, Tianyu
    Nicolaou, Nicos
    [J]. CANCER, 2009, 115 (05) : 946 - 951
  • [8] Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy Combined with Breast-Conserving Surgery in the Treatment of Triple-Negative Breast Cancer
    Zhang, Xiaoyu
    Li, Huixin
    Wu, Feng
    Sun, Dan
    Zhang, Hengle
    Jin, Lijun
    Kang, Xiaoning
    Wang, Zunyi
    [J]. JOURNAL OF ONCOLOGY, 2022, 2022
  • [9] Effect of Margin Width on Local Recurrence in Triple-Negative Breast Cancer Patients Treated with Breast-Conserving Therapy
    Melissa Pilewskie
    Alice Ho
    Emily Orell
    Michelle Stempel
    Yu Chen
    Anne Eaton
    Sujata Patil
    Monica Morrow
    [J]. Annals of Surgical Oncology, 2014, 21 : 1209 - 1214
  • [10] Effect of Margin Width on Local Recurrence in Triple-Negative Breast Cancer Patients Treated with Breast-Conserving Therapy
    Pilewskie, Melissa
    Ho, Alice
    Orell, Emily
    Stempel, Michelle
    Chen, Yu
    Eaton, Anne
    Patil, Sujata
    Morrow, Monica
    [J]. ANNALS OF SURGICAL ONCOLOGY, 2014, 21 (04) : 1209 - 1214