Breast-Conserving Surgery in Triple-Negative Breast Cancer: A Retrospective Cohort Study

被引:1
|
作者
Zhang, Hengle [1 ]
Wang, Zunyi [2 ]
Liu, Wei [2 ]
Wang, Peng [2 ]
Zhang, Xiaoyu [2 ]
机构
[1] Hebei Med Univ, Grad Sch Hebei Med Univ, Cangzhou Cent Hosp, Shijiazhuang, Peoples R China
[2] Cangzhou Cent Hosp, Dept Thyroid & Breast Surg, Cangzhou, Peoples R China
关键词
NEOADJUVANT CHEMOTHERAPY; PREDICTS;
D O I
10.1155/2023/5431563
中图分类号
R [医药、卫生];
学科分类号
10 ;
摘要
Objectives. The aim of the study is to evaluate the efficacy and prognosis of neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) combined with breast-conserving surgery (BCS) in treating triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC) and analyze the influencing factors and predictors of the efficiency and prognosis of NAC. Methods. A retrospective cohort study was conducted by dividing patients into two groups according to two different therapy methods. With BCS as the exposure factor, 46 cases were assigned to the exposed group and 80 cases to the nonexposed group. We compare the difference in operation-related indicators, postoperative complications, local recurrence rate, distant metastasis rate, and overall survival (OS) rate between the two groups. The factors affecting the efficiency and prognosis of NAC were analyzed by binary logistic regression, and the optimal cutoff value was determined by the area under the ROC curve (AUC). The survival curve was plotted, and the univariate log-rank test was performed to analyze the difference in OS between the two groups. The influencing factors of OS were analyzed by the Cox risk regression model. Results. NAC + BCS resulted in significantly less intraoperative blood loss, lower incidence of postoperative complications, and shorter operative time and length of hospital stay than that in NAC (P < 0.05). There was no significant difference in local recurrence, distant metastasis, or OS between the two groups (P > 0.05). Multivariate analysis showed that the clinical stage I and Ki-67 high expression were independent protective factors of the efficacy of NAC. The high expression of Ki-67 and nondecline expression of Ki-67 were independent risk factors of prognosis. Ki-67 high expression was an independent risk factor of OS (P < 0.05). The ROC curve showed that the AUC of Ki-67 for NAC efficacy, prognosis, and OS were 0.706, 0.820, and 0.687, respectively, with optimal cutoff values of 25.5%, 29.0%, and 32.5%, respectively. Survival analysis showed that the OS of patients with NAC + BCS was 73.9% and NAC + MRM was 70.0% (P > 0.05). In the low expression subgroup of Ki-67, the OS of the two groups were 100.0% and 77.8%, respectively (P=0.060). In the high expression subgroup of Ki-67, the OS of the two groups were 53.8% and 63.6%, respectively (P=0.419). Conclusions. NAC + BCS is a good method for treating TNBC, which has an obvious short-term effect and a good long-term prognosis. Clinical stage I and the high expression of Ki-67 are independent protective factors for the efficacy of NAC. The high expression of Ki-67 and nondecline expression of Ki-67 are independent risk factors of prognosis. Ki-67 is a potential predictor for the efficacy, prognosis, and OS of NAC in TNBC patients. The high expression of Ki-67 indicates better NAC efficacy, a poorer prognosis, and a lower OS.
引用
收藏
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Breast-Conserving Therapy for Triple-Negative Breast Cancer
    Gangi, Alexandra
    Chung, Alice
    Mirocha, James
    Liou, Douglas Z.
    Leong, Trista
    Giuliano, Armando E.
    [J]. JAMA SURGERY, 2014, 149 (03) : 252 - 258
  • [2] Local Treatment of Triple-Negative Breast Cancer: Is Mastectomy Superior to Breast-Conserving Surgery?
    Di Leone, Alba
    Franco, Antonio
    Zotta, Francesca
    Scardina, Lorenzo
    Sicignano, Margherita
    Di Guglielmo, Enrico
    Castagnetta, Virginia
    Magno, Stefano
    Terribile, Daniela
    Sanchez, Alejandro Martin
    Franceschini, Gianluca
    Masetti, Riccardo
    [J]. JOURNAL OF PERSONALIZED MEDICINE, 2023, 13 (05):
  • [3] Locoregional Recurrence of Triple-negative Breast Cancer After Breast-conserving Surgery and Radiation
    Freedman, Gary M.
    Anderson, Penny R.
    Li, Tianyu
    Nicolaou, Nicos
    [J]. CANCER, 2009, 115 (05) : 946 - 951
  • [4] Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy Combined with Breast-Conserving Surgery in the Treatment of Triple-Negative Breast Cancer
    Zhang, Xiaoyu
    Li, Huixin
    Wu, Feng
    Sun, Dan
    Zhang, Hengle
    Jin, Lijun
    Kang, Xiaoning
    Wang, Zunyi
    [J]. JOURNAL OF ONCOLOGY, 2022, 2022
  • [5] Reply to Locoregional Recurrence of Triple-Negative Breast Cancer After Breast-Conserving Surgery and Radiation
    Freedman, Gary M.
    [J]. CANCER, 2010, 116 (02) : 538 - 539
  • [6] The Negative Effect of Triple-Negative Breast Cancer on Outcome after Breast-Conserving Therapy
    Zaky, Sandra S.
    Lund, MaryJo
    May, Kelly A.
    Godette, Karen D.
    Beitler, Jonathan J.
    Holmes, Leslie R.
    O'Regan, Ruth M.
    Yu, Esther S.
    Yu, David S.
    Landry, Jerome C.
    [J]. ANNALS OF SURGICAL ONCOLOGY, 2011, 18 (10) : 2858 - 2865
  • [7] The Negative Effect of Triple-Negative Breast Cancer on Outcome after Breast-Conserving Therapy
    Sandra S. Zaky
    MaryJo Lund
    Kelly A. May
    Karen D. Godette
    Jonathan J. Beitler
    Leslie R. Holmes
    Ruth M. O’Regan
    Esther S. Yu
    David S. Yu
    Jerome C. Landry
    [J]. Annals of Surgical Oncology, 2011, 18 : 2858 - 2865
  • [8] Breast-Conserving Therapy vs Total Mastectomy in Triple-Negative Breast Cancer
    Eastman, Amy
    Tammaro, Yolanda
    Andrews, Valerie
    Euhus, David
    Huth, James
    Leitch, Marilyn
    Moldrem, Amy
    Rao, Roshni
    [J]. ANNALS OF SURGICAL ONCOLOGY, 2012, 19 : 44 - 44
  • [9] Breast-conserving surgery versus mastectomy for older women with triple-negative breast cancer: population-based study
    Mburu, Waruiru
    Kulasingam, Shalini
    Hodges, James S.
    Virnig, Beth A.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF COMPARATIVE EFFECTIVENESS RESEARCH, 2022, 11 (13) : 953 - 967
  • [10] Local treatment for triple-negative breast cancer patients undergoing chemotherapy: breast-conserving surgery or total mastectomy?
    Guo, Leqian
    Xie, Guilan
    Wang, Ruiqi
    Yang, Liren
    Sun, Landi
    Xu, Mengmeng
    Yang, Wenfang
    Chung, Mei Chun
    [J]. BMC CANCER, 2021, 21 (01)