Analysis of gene expression using gene sets discriminates cancer patients with and without late radiation toxicity

被引:95
|
作者
Svensson, J. Peter
Stalpers, Lukas J. A.
Esveldt-van Lange, Rebecca E. E.
Franken, Nicolaas A. P.
Haveman, Jaap
Klein, Binie
Turesson, Ingela
Vrieling, Harry
Giphart-Gassler, Micheline [1 ]
机构
[1] Leiden Univ, Med Ctr, Dept Toxicogenet, Leiden, Netherlands
[2] Acad Hosp, Dept Oncol Radiol & Clin Immunol, Uppsala, Sweden
[3] Univ Amsterdam, Acad Med Ctr, Dept Radiotherapy, LEXOR, Amsterdam, Netherlands
关键词
D O I
10.1371/journal.pmed.0030422
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Background Radiation is an effective anti-cancer therapy but leads to severe late radiation toxicity in 5%-10% of patients. Assuming that genetic susceptibility impacts this risk, we hypothesized that the cellular response of normal tissue to X-rays could discriminate patients with and without late radiation toxicity. Methods and Findings Prostate carcinoma patients without evidence of cancer 2 y after curative radiotherapy were recruited in the study. Blood samples of 21 patients with severe late complications from radiation and 17 patients without symptoms were collected. Stimulated peripheral lymphocytes were mock-irradiated or irradiated with 2-Gy X-rays. The 24-h radiation response was analyzed by gene expression profiling and used for classification. Classification was performed either on the expression of separate genes or, to augment the classification power, on gene sets consisting of genes grouped together based on function or cellular colocalization. X- ray irradiation altered the expression of radio-responsive genes in both groups. This response was variable across individuals, and the expression of the most significant radio-responsive genes was unlinked to radiation toxicity. The classifier based on the radiation response of separate genes correctly classified 63% of the patients. The classifier based on affected gene sets improved correct classification to 86%, although on the individual level only 21/38 (55%) patients were classified with high certainty. The majority of the discriminative genes and gene sets belonged to the ubiquitin, apoptosis, and stress signaling networks. The apoptotic response appeared more pronounced in patients that did not develop toxicity. In an independent set of 12 patients, the toxicity status of eight was predicted correctly by the gene set classifier. Conclusions Gene expression profiling succeeded to some extent in discriminating groups of patients with and without severe late radiotherapy toxicity. Moreover, the discriminative power was enhanced by assessment of functionally or structurally related gene sets. While prediction of individual response requires improvement, this study is a step forward in predicting susceptibility to late radiation toxicity.
引用
收藏
页码:1904 / 1914
页数:11
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Molecular karyotyping and gene expression analysis in childhood cancer patients
    Galetzka Danuta
    Müller Tobias
    Dittrich Marcus
    Endres Miriam
    Kartal Nergiz
    Sinizyn Olesja
    Rapp Steffen
    Zeller Tanja
    Müller Christian
    Hankeln Thomas
    Scholz-Kreisel Peter
    Chorzempa Heather
    Mirsch Johanna
    Poplawski Alicia
    Rossmann Heidi
    Spix Claudia
    Haaf Thomas
    Prawitt Dirk
    Marron Manuela
    Schmidberger Heinz
    Journal of Molecular Medicine, 2020, 98 : 1107 - 1123
  • [22] Possibility for Liver Toxicity Evaluation by Gene Set Enrichment Analysis (GSEA) using Key Event-Specific Gene Sets Applying Gene Expression Data Obtained in Rat Primary Hepatocytes
    Akahori, Y.
    Ishida, K.
    Ohno, F.
    Hirose, A.
    TOXICOLOGY LETTERS, 2023, 384 : S294 - S294
  • [23] Molecular karyotyping and gene expression analysis in childhood cancer patients
    Danuta, Galetzka
    Tobias, Mueller
    Marcus, Dittrich
    Miriam, Endres
    Nergiz, Kartal
    Olesja, Sinizyn
    Steffen, Rapp
    Tanja, Zeller
    Christian, Mueller
    Thomas, Hankeln
    Peter, Scholz-Kreisel
    Heather, Chorzempa
    Johanna, Mirsch
    Alicia, Poplawski
    Heidi, Rossmann
    Claudia, Spix
    Thomas, Haaf
    Dirk, Prawitt
    Manuela, Marron
    Heinz, Schmidberger
    JOURNAL OF MOLECULAR MEDICINE-JMM, 2020, 98 (08): : 1107 - 1123
  • [24] Differentiating mechanisms of toxicity using global gene expression analysis in Saccharomyces cerevisiae
    Caba, E
    Dickinson, DA
    Warnes, GR
    Aubrecht, J
    MUTATION RESEARCH-FUNDAMENTAL AND MOLECULAR MECHANISMS OF MUTAGENESIS, 2005, 575 (1-2) : 34 - 46
  • [25] Association between single nucleotide polymorphisms in the gene for XRCC1 and radiation-induced late toxicity in prostate cancer patients
    Langsenlehner, Tanja
    Renner, Wilfried
    Gerger, Armin
    Hofmann, Guenter
    Thurner, Eva-Maria
    Kapp, Karin S.
    Langsenlehner, Uwe
    RADIOTHERAPY AND ONCOLOGY, 2011, 98 (03) : 387 - 393
  • [26] Intrinsic bias in breast cancer gene expression data sets
    Mosley, Jonathan D.
    Keri, Ruth A.
    BMC CANCER, 2009, 9
  • [27] Intrinsic bias in breast cancer gene expression data sets
    Jonathan D Mosley
    Ruth A Keri
    BMC Cancer, 9
  • [28] Random forests-based differential analysis of gene sets for gene expression data
    Hsueh, Huey-Miin
    Zhou, Da-Wei
    Tsai, Chen-An
    GENE, 2013, 518 (01) : 179 - 186
  • [29] Gene Expression Changes Predict Acute and Late Toxicity to Combined PARP1 Inhibition and Radiation (RT) in High Risk Breast Cancer Patients-Results of the Biomarker Analysis of TBCRC 024
    Speers, C.
    Chandler, B.
    Olsen, E.
    Moubadder, L.
    Thomas, D.
    Liu, M.
    Griffith, K.
    Bellon, J. R.
    Woodward, W. A.
    Horton, J. K.
    Ho, A. Y.
    Overmoyer, B.
    Sabel, M. S.
    Schott, A. F.
    Feng, F. Y.
    Pierce, L. J.
    Jagsi, R.
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RADIATION ONCOLOGY BIOLOGY PHYSICS, 2018, 102 (03): : S67 - S67
  • [30] Analysis of gene and protein expression for drug mode of toxicity
    Furness, LM
    CURRENT OPINION IN DRUG DISCOVERY & DEVELOPMENT, 2002, 5 (01) : 98 - 103