Subaperture approaches to finishing and testing astronomical optics

被引:3
|
作者
Forbes, G [1 ]
Tricard, M [1 ]
机构
[1] QED Technol Inc, Rochester, NY 14607 USA
关键词
D O I
10.1117/12.566312
中图分类号
TH7 [仪器、仪表];
学科分类号
0804 ; 080401 ; 081102 ;
摘要
We describe the application of both stitching interferometry and magneto-rheological finishing (MRF) to the surface metrology and final figure correction of large optics. These particular subaperture technologies help to address the need for flexible systems that improve both overall manufacturing time and cost effectiveness. MRF can achieve high volumetric removal rates with a small-footprint tool that is perfectly conformable and highly stable. This tool is therefore well suited to finishing large optics (including aspheres) and correcting mid-spatial frequency errors. The system does not need vacuum, reduces microroughness to below one nm. rms on most materials, and is able to meet the figure tolerance specs for astronomical optics. Such a technology is ideally complemented by a system for the stitching of interferometric subaperture data. Stitching inherently enables the testing of larger apertures with higher resolution and, thanks to the inbuilt calibration, even to higher accuracy in many situations. Moreover, given the low-order character of the dominant residual uncertainties in the stitched full-aperture data, such an approach is well suited to adaptive mirrors because the actuators correct precisely these deformations. While this approach enables the non-null testing of parts with greater aspheric departure and can lead to a significantly reduced non-common air path in the testing of long-radius concave parts, it is especially effective for convex optics. That is, stitching is particularly well suited to the testing of secondary mirrors and, alongside the testing of the off-axis primary segments, these are clearly critical challenges for extremely large telescope (ELT) projects.
引用
收藏
页码:440 / 448
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Astronomical adaptive optics: a review
    Rao, Changhui
    Zhong, Libo
    Guo, Youming
    Li, Min
    Zhang, Lanqiang
    Wei, Kai
    PHOTONIX, 2024, 5 (01)
  • [32] RECENT ADVANCES IN ASTRONOMICAL OPTICS
    GASCOIGNE, SC
    APPLIED OPTICS, 1973, 12 (07) : 1419 - 1429
  • [33] Fiber optics in astronomical instruments
    Barden, Samuel C.
    Optics and Photonics News, 1996, 7 (02):
  • [34] ATTACKING THE ASTRONOMICAL ODDS IN MASS FINISHING
    KITTREDGE, JB
    METAL FINISHING, 1984, 82 (09) : 67 - 72
  • [35] ASTRONOMICAL OPTICS - ADAPTIVE OPTICS OFFERED TO AMATEUR ASTRONOMERS
    CARTS, YA
    LASER FOCUS WORLD, 1993, 29 (03): : 15 - 15
  • [36] Optical turbulence generators for testing astronomical adaptive optics systems: A review and designer guide
    Jolissaint, Laurent
    PUBLICATIONS OF THE ASTRONOMICAL SOCIETY OF THE PACIFIC, 2006, 118 (847) : 1205 - 1224
  • [37] Effect of Reference Surface Error on Subaperture Stitching for Flat Optics
    Li Mengyang
    Cao Tingfen
    Yuan Xiaodong
    Zhang Jinli
    Liu Changchun
    Yi Congzhi
    Chen Haiping
    Quan Xusong
    CHINESE JOURNAL OF LASERS-ZHONGGUO JIGUANG, 2019, 46 (12):
  • [38] Effect of Reference Surface Error on Subaperture Stitching for Flat Optics
    Li M.
    Cao T.
    Yuan X.
    Zhang J.
    Liu C.
    Yi C.
    Chen H.
    Quan X.
    Zhongguo Jiguang/Chinese Journal of Lasers, 2019, 46 (12):
  • [39] Testing Parabolic Surfaces with Annular Subaperture Interferograms
    Ferm$ian Granados-Agust$ian
    J. Fausto Escobar-Romero
    Alejandro Cornejo-Rodr$iaguez
    Optical Review, 2004, 11 : 82 - 86
  • [40] Testing asphere by subaperture stitching interferometric method
    Wang, Xiao-Kun
    Wang, Li-Hui
    Zhang, Xue-Jun
    Guangxue Jingmi Gongcheng/Optics and Precision Engineering, 2007, 15 (02): : 192 - 198