Evaluation of flash flood severity in Korea using the modified flash flood index (MFFI)

被引:7
|
作者
Kim, B-S. [1 ]
Kim, H-S. [2 ]
机构
[1] Kangwon Natl Univ, Sch Disaster Prevent, Dept Urban Environm Prevent Engn, Samcheck 245711, South Korea
[2] Inha Univ, Dept Civil Engn, Inchon, South Korea
来源
JOURNAL OF FLOOD RISK MANAGEMENT | 2014年 / 7卷 / 04期
关键词
Flash flood; flood response time; modified flash flood index (MFFI); rainfall intensity; rising curve gradient; runoff hydrograph; SOUTH-KOREA;
D O I
10.1111/jfr3.12057
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
This paper was initially motivated by a flash flood index (FFI) study performed by Bhaskar et al. and others that explained flash floods using a runoff perspective by extracting a rising curve gradient, the flood magnitude ratio, and flood response time variables from runoff hydrograph. However, the runoff data are not sufficient to estimate a robust flood magnitude ratio in Korea. In addition, the existing model is not able to consider high rainfall intensity, which is an important flash flood characteristic in Korea. Flood magnitude ratio variables, thus, were replaced by rainfall intensity variables. Then, the results were compared with the existing FFI. The spatial distribution of the flood event in the Han River basin that occurred in July 2006 showed that a modified FFI, which reflects rainfall characteristics, outperformed in representing damaged (flash flood occurrence) areas in the past. Furthermore, the FFI for three different time windows (early, middle, and late periods) for the Han River basin during the localised intensive rainfall in July 2006 were analysed. Analysis of spatiotemporal distribution showed that sudden intensity was pronounced in the Seoul area during the first 10 days of July. During the second 10 days of July, a probable high-intensity flash flood appeared in the Gangwon-do area. Meanwhile, an onsite survey of the Gangwon-do area showed that the actual occurrences of a high-intensity flash flood were largely in agreement with the predictions made by the model.
引用
收藏
页码:344 / 356
页数:13
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Flash flood type identification and simulation based on flash flood behavior indices in China
    Zhai, Xiaoyan
    Guo, Liang
    Zhang, Yongyong
    [J]. SCIENCE CHINA-EARTH SCIENCES, 2021, 64 (07) : 1140 - 1154
  • [22] Comparison of adaptability to flash flood between rice cultivars differing in flash flood tolerance
    Kawano, N
    Ella, E
    Ito, O
    Yamauchi, Y
    Tanaka, K
    [J]. SOIL SCIENCE AND PLANT NUTRITION, 2002, 48 (05) : 659 - 665
  • [23] Improved flash flood predictions
    Adams, CR
    Hooke, WH
    [J]. COPING WITH FLASH FLOODS, 2001, 77 : 309 - 315
  • [24] Historic flash flood on Ascension
    Kemp, Ken
    [J]. WEATHER, 2016, 71 (08) : 193 - 194
  • [25] FLASH FLOOD WARNING SYSTEM
    COLTON, DE
    BURNASH, RJC
    [J]. BULLETIN OF THE AMERICAN METEOROLOGICAL SOCIETY, 1978, 59 (02) : 221 - 221
  • [26] Forecasting and Projection of Flash Flood
    Bronstert, Axel
    Buerger, Gerhard
    Pfister, Angela
    [J]. HYDROLOGIE UND WASSERBEWIRTSCHAFTUNG, 2021, 65 (06): : 260 - 261
  • [27] NATIONAL FLASH FLOOD PROGRAM
    CARNAHAN, RL
    KELLEY, RK
    [J]. BULLETIN OF THE AMERICAN METEOROLOGICAL SOCIETY, 1979, 60 (11) : 1392 - 1392
  • [28] A New Flood Index for Use in Evaluation of Local Flood Severity: A Case Study of Small Ungauged Catchments in Korea
    Ahn, Jae Hyun
    Choi, Hyun Il
    [J]. JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN WATER RESOURCES ASSOCIATION, 2013, 49 (01): : 1 - 14
  • [29] How to survive a flash flood
    张子君
    [J]. 语数外学习(高中版上旬), 2021, (09) : 93 - 94
  • [30] Flash flood disasters in Uttarakhand
    Pande, Ravindra K.
    [J]. DISASTER PREVENTION AND MANAGEMENT, 2010, 19 (05) : 565 - 570