Real-world persistence and benefit-risk profile of fingolimod over 36 months in Germany

被引:28
|
作者
Ziemssen, Tjalf [1 ]
Lang, Michael [2 ]
Tackenberg, Bjoern [3 ]
Schmidt, Stephan [4 ]
Albrecht, Holger [5 ]
Klotz, Luisa [6 ]
Haas, Judith [7 ]
Lassek, Christoph [8 ]
Couto, C. Anne-Marie [9 ]
Findlay, John A. [9 ]
Cornelissen, Christian [10 ]
机构
[1] Univ Technol, Neurol Univ Clin Carl Gustav Carus, Ctr Clin Neurosci, Dresden, Germany
[2] NeuroPoint Patient Acad, Ulm, Germany
[3] Philipps Univ, Ctr Neuroimmunol, Dept Neurol, Marburg, Germany
[4] Bonn Neurol Practice, Bonn, Germany
[5] Neurol Practice, Munich, Germany
[6] Univ Hosp Munster, Dept Neurol, Munster, Germany
[7] Jewish Hosp Berlin, Ctr Multiple Sclerosis, Berlin, Germany
[8] Kassel & Vellmar Neurol Practice, Vellmar, Germany
[9] Oxford PharmaGenesis, Oxford, England
[10] Novartis Pharma GmbH, Nurnberg, Germany
来源
关键词
REMITTING MULTIPLE-SCLEROSIS; LONG-TERM; ORAL FINGOLIMOD; SAFETY; INSIGHTS; COSTS; EFFICACY; BURDEN; EUROPE; TRIAL;
D O I
10.1212/NXI.0000000000000548
中图分类号
R74 [神经病学与精神病学];
学科分类号
摘要
Objective To assess the long-term real-world benefit-risk profile of fingolimod in patients with relapsing MS in Germany. Methods This analysis used data from the noninterventional real-world study, Post-Authorization Non-interventional German sAfety study of GilEnyA (PANGAEA), to assess prospectively the persistence, effectiveness, and safety of fingolimod over 36 months (+/- 90 days) in Germany. For inclusion in the effectiveness analysis (n = 2,537), patients were required to have received fingolimod for the first time in PANGAEA, to have at least 12 months of data, and to have completed each 12-month follow-up period. For the safety analysis (n = 3,266), patients were additionally allowed to have received fingolimod before enrollment. Results At baseline, 94.7% of patients in the effectiveness analysis had received a previous disease-modifying therapy. After 36 months, 70.4% of patients were still receiving fingolimod. Over this period, annualized relapse rates decreased to 0.265 (95% CI: 0.244-0.286) from 1.79 (95% CI: 1.75-1.83), and mean Expanded Disability Status Scale scores remained stable (mean change from baseline: +0.049 [95% CI: -0.015 to +0.114]). In total, 16% of patients had 6-month confirmed disability improvement, 12.5% had 6-month confirmed disability worsening, and 52.4% were free from relapses and 6-month confirmed disability worsening. Adverse events (AEs) and serious AEs were experienced by up to 23.4% and 3.9% of patients, respectively, during any of the 12-month follow-up periods. The frequency and nature of AEs were in line with previous findings. Conclusions Using systematically collected data from PANGAEA, this analysis demonstrates the sustained effectiveness, high persistence, and manageable safety profile of fingolimod over 36 months.
引用
收藏
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Real-world data collection in early access programs: An additional source of data to inform benefit-risk assessment in the pre-approval phase
    Soni, Mira
    Saragoussi, Delphine
    Stein, Dara
    Eckley, Doug
    Block, Jodie
    PHARMACOEPIDEMIOLOGY AND DRUG SAFETY, 2020, 29 : 6 - 6
  • [22] Persistence to fingolimod compared with other disease modifying therapies in the Australian real-world setting using the MS base registry
    Spelman, T.
    Schulz, M.
    Arora, B.
    Chung, E.
    Juneja, P.
    Walker, R.
    Verhaeghe, S.
    Butzkueven, H.
    Hodgkinson, S.
    Lechner-Scott, J.
    McCombe, P.
    Slee, M.
    Butler, E.
    Barnett, M.
    Skibina, O.
    Vucic, S.
    Macdonell, R.
    Shuey, N.
    Taylor, B.
    Broadley, S.
    MULTIPLE SCLEROSIS JOURNAL, 2017, 23 : 631 - 631
  • [23] Continuous intraperitoneal insulin infusion shows a great benefit-risk ratio under long-term real-world use in a vulnerable population with diabetes
    Gehr, B.
    Muehlen, H.
    Renard, E.
    Hilgard, D.
    Oliver, N.
    Mueller-Hoffmann, W.
    Liebl, A.
    DIABETOLOGIA, 2019, 62 : S426 - S426
  • [24] Applying the OMOP Common Data Model to Facilitate Benefit-Risk Assessments of Medicinal Products Using Real-World Data from Singapore and South Korea
    Tan, Hui Xing
    Teo, Desmond Chun Hwee
    Lee, Dongyun
    Kim, Chungsoo
    Neo, Jing Wei
    Sung, Cynthia
    Chahed, Haroun
    Ang, Pei San
    Tan, Doreen Su Yin
    Park, Rae Woong
    Dorajoo, Sreemanee Raaj
    HEALTHCARE INFORMATICS RESEARCH, 2022, 28 (02) : 112 - 122
  • [25] Ten years of fingolimod in multiple sclerosis: Who will benefit from it? Insights from a large real-world cohort study
    Gauer, L.
    Bigaut, K.
    Berger, E.
    Debouverie, M.
    Moreau, T.
    de Seze, J.
    MULTIPLE SCLEROSIS JOURNAL, 2021, 27 (2_SUPPL) : 613 - 614
  • [26] A leadless pacemaker in the real-world setting: Patient profile and performance over time
    Roberts, Paul R.
    Clementy, Nicolas
    Mondoly, Pierre
    Winter, Stefan
    Bordachar, Pierre
    Sharman, David
    Jung, Werner
    Eschalier, Romain
    Theis, Cathrin
    Defaye, Pascal
    Anderson, Christopher
    Pol, Aimee
    Butler, Kiah
    Garweg, Christophe
    JOURNAL OF ARRHYTHMIA, 2023, 39 (01) : 1 - 9
  • [27] Real life use of natalizumab, fingolimod, dimethylfumarate, teriflunomide and alemtuzumab in Austria: benefit-risk data from the Austrian Multiple Sclerosis Treatment Registry
    Guger, M.
    Enzinger, C.
    Leutmezer, F.
    Kraus, J.
    Berger, T.
    MULTIPLE SCLEROSIS JOURNAL, 2016, 22 : 788 - 789
  • [28] Etanercept persistence in juvenile idiopathic arthritis up to adult care in patients in Germany: a real-world analysis
    Minden, Kirsten
    Horneff, Gerd
    Blum, Andreas
    Curiale, Cinzia
    Tarallo, Miriam
    Hudson, Nicholas
    Gray, Christen M.
    Cappelleri, Joseph C.
    Daly, Ana Cristina Hernandez
    RHEUMATOLOGY, 2019, 58
  • [29] Use of real-world evidence in personalized benefit risk assessment: Closing the knowledge gap
    Pinto, Cathy Anne
    Tervonen, Tommi
    Marsh, Kevin
    Lambrelli, Dimitra
    Schultze, Anna
    Tershakovec, Andy
    Hyacinthe, Johanna
    Prawitz, Thibaud
    Hammad, Tarek
    PHARMACOEPIDEMIOLOGY AND DRUG SAFETY, 2018, 27 : 187 - 187
  • [30] Commentary: The Real-world Convergence of Comparative Effectiveness Research and Risk-Benefit Assessment
    Doyle, John J.
    DRUG INFORMATION JOURNAL, 2011, 45 (06): : 691 - 696