Number of positive preoperative biopsy cores is a predictor of positive surgical margins (PSM) in small prostates after robot-assisted radical prostatectomy (RARP)

被引:18
|
作者
Tuliao, Patrick H.
Koo, Kyo C.
Komninos, Christos
Chang, Chien H.
Choi, Young D.
Chung, Byung H.
Hong, Sung J.
Rha, Koon H. [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Yonsei Univ, Coll Med, Dept Urol, Seoul 120752, South Korea
[2] Yonsei Univ, Coll Med, Urol Sci Inst, Seoul 120752, South Korea
关键词
prostate; prostatic neoplasms; prostatectomy; surgical margins; CANCER; OUTCOMES; IMPACT; SIZE; WEIGHT; EXPERIENCE; OBESITY; VOLUME; GRADE; GLAND;
D O I
10.1111/bju.12888
中图分类号
R5 [内科学]; R69 [泌尿科学(泌尿生殖系疾病)];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Objective To determine the impact of prostate size on positive surgical margin (PSM) rates after robot-assisted radical prostatectomy (RARP) and the preoperative factors associated with PSM. Patients and Methods In all, 1229 men underwent RARP by a single surgeon, from 2005 to August of 2013. Excluded were patients who had transurethral resection of the prostate, neoadjuvant therapy, clinically advanced cancer, and the first 200 performed cases (to reduce the effect of learning curve). Included were 815 patients who were then divided into three prostate size groups: <31 g (group 1), 31-45 g (group 2), >45 g (group 3). Multivariate analysis determined predictors of PSM and biochemical recurrence (BCR). Results Console time and blood loss increased with increasing prostate size. There were more high-grade tumours in group 1 (group 1 vs group 2 and group 3, 33.9% vs 25.1% and 25.6%, P = 0.003 and P = 0.005). PSM rates were higher in prostates of <45 g with preoperative PSA levels of >20 ng/dL, Gleason score >= 7, T3 tumour, and >= 3 positive biopsy cores. In group 1, preoperative stage T3 [odds ratio (OR) 3.94, P = 0.020] and >= 3 positive biopsy cores (OR 2.52, P = 0.043) were predictive of PSM, while a PSA level of >20 ng/dL predicted the occurrence of BCR (OR 5.34, P = 0.021). No preoperative factors predicted PSM or BCR for groups 2 and 3. Conclusion A preoperative biopsy with >= 3 positive cores in men with small prostates predicts PSM after RARP. In small prostates with PSM, a PSA level of >20 ng/dL is a predictor of BCR. These factors should guide the choice of therapy and indicate the need for closer postoperative follow-up.
引用
收藏
页码:897 / 904
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Preoperative MRI to assess the anatomical location of positive surgical margin at Robot-Assisted Radical Prostatectomy (RARP)
    van der Graaf, S. H.
    Sweere, V.
    Veerman, H.
    Boellaard, T. N.
    Schoots, I. G.
    Wit, E. M. K.
    Roeleveld, T. A.
    Nieuwenhuijzen, J. A.
    Vis, A. N.
    Beerlage, H. P.
    Van der Poel, H. G.
    Van Leeuwen, P. J.
    EUROPEAN UROLOGY, 2024, 85 : S2029 - S2029
  • [2] Management of positive surgical margins after robot-assisted radical prostatectomy: Single institution experience
    Pang, See-Tong
    Lin, Po-Hung
    Chuang, Cheng-Keng
    Chang, Ying-Hsu
    Liu, Chung-Yi
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2016, 23 : 71 - 72
  • [3] Predictive Factors for Positive Surgical Margins and Their Locations After Robot-Assisted Laparoscopic Radical Prostatectomy
    Coelho, Rafael F.
    Chauhan, Sanket
    Orvieto, Marcelo A.
    Palmer, Kenneth J.
    Rocco, Bernardo
    Patel, Vipul R.
    EUROPEAN UROLOGY, 2010, 57 (06) : 1022 - 1029
  • [6] Predictors of Positive Surgical Margins After Laparoscopic Robot Assisted Radical Prostatectomy
    Ficarra, Vincenzo
    Novara, Giacomo
    Secco, Silvia
    D'Elia, Carolina
    Boscolo-Berto, Rafael
    Gardiman, Marina
    Cavalleri, Stefano
    Artibani, Walter
    JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2009, 182 (06): : 2682 - 2688
  • [7] The impact of 3D models on positive surgical margins after robot-assisted radical prostatectomy
    Checcucci, Enrico
    Pecoraro, Angela
    Amparore, Daniele
    De Cillis, Sabrina
    Granato, Stefano
    Volpi, Gabriele
    Sica, Michele
    Verri, Paolo
    Piana, Alberto
    Piazzolla, Pietro
    Manfredi, Matteo
    Vezzetti, Enrico
    Di Dio, Michele
    Fiori, Cristian
    Porpiglia, Francesco
    Urology, Uro-technology And Some Working Group Of The Young Academic Urologists Working Party Of The European Association Of
    WORLD JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2022, 40 (09) : 2221 - 2229
  • [8] The impact of 3D models on positive surgical margins after robot-assisted radical prostatectomy
    Enrico Checcucci
    Angela Pecoraro
    Daniele Amparore
    Sabrina De Cillis
    Stefano Granato
    Gabriele Volpi
    Michele Sica
    Paolo Verri
    Alberto Piana
    Pietro Piazzolla
    Matteo Manfredi
    Enrico Vezzetti
    Michele Di Dio
    Cristian Fiori
    Francesco Porpiglia
    World Journal of Urology, 2022, 40 : 2221 - 2229
  • [9] Which surgical margins truly matter? Identifying clinically relevant positive surgical margins after robot-assisted radical prostatectomy
    Veerman, H.
    Meijer, D.
    Van Leeuwen, P. J.
    Vis, A. N.
    Van der Poel, H. G.
    EUROPEAN UROLOGY, 2021, 79 : S1713 - S1714
  • [10] Evaluation of positive surgical margins in patients undergoing robot-assisted and open radical prostatectomy according to preoperative risk groups
    Suardi, Nazareno
    Dell'Oglio, Paolo
    Gallina, Andrea
    Gandaglia, Giorgio
    Buffi, Nicolo
    Moschini, Marco
    Fossati, Nicola
    Lughezzani, Giovanni
    Karakiewicz, Pierre I.
    Freschi, Massimo
    Luciano, Roberta
    Shariat, Shahrokh F.
    Guazzoni, Giorgio
    Gaboardi, Franco
    Montorsi, Francesco
    Briganti, Alberto
    UROLOGIC ONCOLOGY-SEMINARS AND ORIGINAL INVESTIGATIONS, 2016, 34 (02) : 57.e1 - 57.e7