Evaluation of positive surgical margins in patients undergoing robot-assisted and open radical prostatectomy according to preoperative risk groups

被引:13
|
作者
Suardi, Nazareno [1 ]
Dell'Oglio, Paolo [1 ,2 ]
Gallina, Andrea [1 ]
Gandaglia, Giorgio [1 ]
Buffi, Nicolo [3 ]
Moschini, Marco [1 ]
Fossati, Nicola [1 ]
Lughezzani, Giovanni [3 ]
Karakiewicz, Pierre I. [2 ,4 ]
Freschi, Massimo [5 ]
Luciano, Roberta [5 ]
Shariat, Shahrokh F. [6 ,7 ]
Guazzoni, Giorgio [3 ]
Gaboardi, Franco [1 ]
Montorsi, Francesco [1 ]
Briganti, Alberto [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Milan, Osped San Raffaele, IRCCS, Div Oncol,Unit Urol,Urol Res Inst, I-20127 Milan, Italy
[2] Univ Montreal, Ctr Hlth, Canc Prognost & Hlth Outcomes Unit, Montreal, PQ, Canada
[3] Humanitas Clin & Res Ctr, Dept Urol, Milan, Italy
[4] Univ Montreal, Ctr Hlth, Dept Urol, Montreal, PQ, Canada
[5] Univ Milan, Osped San Raffaele, IRCCS, Div Oncol,Unit Pathol, I-20127 Milan, Italy
[6] Med Univ Vienna, Dept Urol, Vienna, Austria
[7] Gen Hosp, Vienna, Austria
关键词
Prostate cancer; Positive surgical margins; Robot-assisted radical prostatectomy; URINARY CONTINENCE RECOVERY; RETROPUBIC PROSTATECTOMY; METAANALYSIS; CANCER; RATES; IMPACT;
D O I
10.1016/j.urolonc.2015.08.019
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
Objectives: Recent studies showed that robot-assisted radical prostatectomy (RARP) represents an oncologically safe procedure in patients with prostate cancer (PCa), where the rate of positive surgical margins (PSMs) might be lower in patients treated with RARP as compared with that of those undergoing the open approach (open RP [ORP]). The aim of this study is to analyze the rate of PSMs according to preoperative risk groups in a large cohort of patients treated with RARP and ORP in a single institution with standardized surgical technique and pathological examination. Materials and methods: We evaluated 6,194 consecutive patients with PCa undergoing either ORP (71.1%) or RARP (28.9%) between 1992 and 2014. Logistic regression analyses were used to test the association between type of surgery and PSMs in each preoperative risk group (low vs. intermediate vs. high) after adjusting for confounders. Results: Overall, 21.6% patients had PSMs. RARP was associated with a lower rate of PSMs in low-risk (11.5 vs. 15.4%, P = 0.01), intermediate-risk (18.9 vs. 23.5%, P = 0.008), and high-risk patients (19.7 vs. 30.1%, P < 0.001). In multivariable analyses, after stratification according to risk group categories, no difference in PSMs between RARP and ORP was observed for low-risk (odds ratio [OR] = 0.87, P = 0.46) and intermediate-risk patients (OR = 0.84, P = 0.19). Conversely, RARP was associated with lower odds of PSMs in high-risk patients (OR = 0.69, P = 0.04). Similar results were observed when our analyses were repeated after accounting for pathological characteristics, in patients treated between 2006 and 2014 and in a cohort of men treated by high-volume surgeons (all P <= 0.03). Conclusions: The introduction of RARP at our institution led to a significant reduction in the risk of PSMs in patients with PCa with high-risk disease. (C) 2016 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:57.e1 / 57.e7
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] RATE, LOCATION AND PREDICTIVE FACTORS OF POSITIVE SURGICAL MARGINS IN HIGH-RISK PATIENTS UNDERGOING ROBOT-ASSISTED RADICAL PROSTATECTOMY
    Schatloff, O.
    Chauhan, S.
    Sivaraman, A.
    Samavedi, S.
    Giedelman, C.
    Abdul-Muhsin, H.
    Coelho, R.
    Rocco, B.
    Palmer, K.
    Patel, V
    BJU INTERNATIONAL, 2012, 110 : 21 - 22
  • [2] Comparison of Robot-Assisted and Open Retropubic Radical Prostatectomy for Risk of Biochemical Progression in Men with Positive Surgical Margins
    Shapiro, Edan Y.
    Scarberry, Kyle
    Patel, Trushar
    Bergman, Ari
    Ahn, Jennifer J.
    Sahi, Nilesh
    RoyChoudhury, Arindam
    Deutch, Israel
    McKiernan, James M.
    Benson, Mitchell C.
    Badani, Ketan K.
    JOURNAL OF ENDOUROLOGY, 2014, 28 (02) : 208 - 213
  • [3] Evaluation of PSA recurrence and positive surgical margins following the robot-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy
    China, T.
    Horiuchi, A.
    Kanayama, M.
    Kitamura, K.
    Nagata, M.
    Ide, H.
    Muto, S.
    Yamaguchi, R.
    Horie, S.
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2017, 24 : 100 - 100
  • [4] Predictors of positive surgical margins at open and robot-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy: A single surgeon series
    Weerakoon M.
    Sengupta S.
    Sethi K.
    Ischia J.
    Webb D.R.
    Journal of Robotic Surgery, 2012, 6 (4) : 311 - 316
  • [5] Nerve Sparing during Robot-Assisted Radical Prostatectomy Increases the Risk of Ipsilateral Positive Surgical Margins
    Soeterik, T. F. W.
    van Melick, H. H. E.
    Dijksman, L. M.
    Stomps, S.
    Witjes, J. A.
    van Basten, J. P. A.
    JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2020, 204 (01): : 91 - 95
  • [8] Rate, location and predictive factors of positive surgical margins in high-risk patients undergoing robot assisted radical prostatectomy
    Schatloff, O.
    Sivaraman, A.
    Chauhan, S.
    Ortega, F.
    Palmer, K. J.
    Patel, V. R.
    EUROPEAN UROLOGY SUPPLEMENTS, 2012, 11 (01) : E878 - U849
  • [9] RATE, LOCATION AND PREDICTIVE FACTORS OF POSITIVE SURGICAL MARGINS IN HIGH-RISK PATIENTS UNDERGOING ROBOT ASSISTED RADICAL PROSTATECTOMY
    Schatloff, Oscar
    Chauhan, Sanket
    Sivaraman, Ananthakrishnan
    Giedelman, Camilo
    Muhsin, Haidar Abdul
    Samavedi, Srinivas
    Palmer, Kenneth
    Patel, Vipul
    JOURNAL OF ENDOUROLOGY, 2012, 26 : A309 - A310
  • [10] Management of positive surgical margins after robot-assisted radical prostatectomy: Single institution experience
    Pang, See-Tong
    Lin, Po-Hung
    Chuang, Cheng-Keng
    Chang, Ying-Hsu
    Liu, Chung-Yi
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2016, 23 : 71 - 72