Evaluation of positive surgical margins in patients undergoing robot-assisted and open radical prostatectomy according to preoperative risk groups

被引:13
|
作者
Suardi, Nazareno [1 ]
Dell'Oglio, Paolo [1 ,2 ]
Gallina, Andrea [1 ]
Gandaglia, Giorgio [1 ]
Buffi, Nicolo [3 ]
Moschini, Marco [1 ]
Fossati, Nicola [1 ]
Lughezzani, Giovanni [3 ]
Karakiewicz, Pierre I. [2 ,4 ]
Freschi, Massimo [5 ]
Luciano, Roberta [5 ]
Shariat, Shahrokh F. [6 ,7 ]
Guazzoni, Giorgio [3 ]
Gaboardi, Franco [1 ]
Montorsi, Francesco [1 ]
Briganti, Alberto [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Milan, Osped San Raffaele, IRCCS, Div Oncol,Unit Urol,Urol Res Inst, I-20127 Milan, Italy
[2] Univ Montreal, Ctr Hlth, Canc Prognost & Hlth Outcomes Unit, Montreal, PQ, Canada
[3] Humanitas Clin & Res Ctr, Dept Urol, Milan, Italy
[4] Univ Montreal, Ctr Hlth, Dept Urol, Montreal, PQ, Canada
[5] Univ Milan, Osped San Raffaele, IRCCS, Div Oncol,Unit Pathol, I-20127 Milan, Italy
[6] Med Univ Vienna, Dept Urol, Vienna, Austria
[7] Gen Hosp, Vienna, Austria
关键词
Prostate cancer; Positive surgical margins; Robot-assisted radical prostatectomy; URINARY CONTINENCE RECOVERY; RETROPUBIC PROSTATECTOMY; METAANALYSIS; CANCER; RATES; IMPACT;
D O I
10.1016/j.urolonc.2015.08.019
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
Objectives: Recent studies showed that robot-assisted radical prostatectomy (RARP) represents an oncologically safe procedure in patients with prostate cancer (PCa), where the rate of positive surgical margins (PSMs) might be lower in patients treated with RARP as compared with that of those undergoing the open approach (open RP [ORP]). The aim of this study is to analyze the rate of PSMs according to preoperative risk groups in a large cohort of patients treated with RARP and ORP in a single institution with standardized surgical technique and pathological examination. Materials and methods: We evaluated 6,194 consecutive patients with PCa undergoing either ORP (71.1%) or RARP (28.9%) between 1992 and 2014. Logistic regression analyses were used to test the association between type of surgery and PSMs in each preoperative risk group (low vs. intermediate vs. high) after adjusting for confounders. Results: Overall, 21.6% patients had PSMs. RARP was associated with a lower rate of PSMs in low-risk (11.5 vs. 15.4%, P = 0.01), intermediate-risk (18.9 vs. 23.5%, P = 0.008), and high-risk patients (19.7 vs. 30.1%, P < 0.001). In multivariable analyses, after stratification according to risk group categories, no difference in PSMs between RARP and ORP was observed for low-risk (odds ratio [OR] = 0.87, P = 0.46) and intermediate-risk patients (OR = 0.84, P = 0.19). Conversely, RARP was associated with lower odds of PSMs in high-risk patients (OR = 0.69, P = 0.04). Similar results were observed when our analyses were repeated after accounting for pathological characteristics, in patients treated between 2006 and 2014 and in a cohort of men treated by high-volume surgeons (all P <= 0.03). Conclusions: The introduction of RARP at our institution led to a significant reduction in the risk of PSMs in patients with PCa with high-risk disease. (C) 2016 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:57.e1 / 57.e7
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] The comparison of prevalence and location of positive surgical margin positivity in prostate cancer patients undergoing open, laparoscopic, and DaVinci robot-assisted radical prostatectomy
    Borowczak, J.
    Maniewski, M.
    Szylberg, L.
    VIRCHOWS ARCHIV, 2024, 485 : S166 - S166
  • [32] Preoperative MRI to assess the anatomical location of positive surgical margin at Robot-Assisted Radical Prostatectomy (RARP)
    van der Graaf, S. H.
    Sweere, V.
    Veerman, H.
    Boellaard, T. N.
    Schoots, I. G.
    Wit, E. M. K.
    Roeleveld, T. A.
    Nieuwenhuijzen, J. A.
    Vis, A. N.
    Beerlage, H. P.
    Van der Poel, H. G.
    Van Leeuwen, P. J.
    EUROPEAN UROLOGY, 2024, 85 : S2029 - S2029
  • [33] Predictors of Positive Surgical Margins After Laparoscopic Robot Assisted Radical Prostatectomy
    Ficarra, Vincenzo
    Novara, Giacomo
    Secco, Silvia
    D'Elia, Carolina
    Boscolo-Berto, Rafael
    Gardiman, Marina
    Cavalleri, Stefano
    Artibani, Walter
    JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2009, 182 (06): : 2682 - 2688
  • [34] Open versus Robot-assisted radical Prostatectomy
    Ganzer, R.
    Stolzenburg, J. -U.
    UROLOGE, 2017, 56 (01): : 65 - 66
  • [35] Positive Margins in pT2 Prostate Cancer in Open, Laparoscopic and Robot-Assisted Radical Prostatectomy Specimens
    Troncoso, P.
    Matin, S.
    Babaian, R. J.
    Pettaway, C. A.
    Pisters, L. L.
    Prokhorova, I.
    Davis, J. W.
    LABORATORY INVESTIGATION, 2010, 90 : 222A - 223A
  • [36] POSITIVE SURGICAL MARGIN RATES IN PATIENTS UNDERGOING BILATERAL INTRAFACIAL NERVE SPARING ROBOT-ASSISTED LAPAROSCOPIC RADICAL PROSTATECTOMY
    Labanaris, A. P.
    Zugor, V
    Schuette, A.
    Wagner, C.
    Witt, J. H.
    BJU INTERNATIONAL, 2012, 110 : 15 - 16
  • [37] Positive Surgical Margins Rate of Retzius-Sparing Robot-Assisted Radical Prostatectomy in a Contemporary, Unselected Cohort
    Bahouth, Zaher
    Laniado, Marc
    Fowler, Ross
    Charlesworth, Philip J. S.
    JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2022, 207 (03): : 609 - 615
  • [38] POSITIVE SURGICAL MARGIN RATES IN PATIENTS UNDERGOING BILATERAL INTRAFACIAL NERVE SPARING ROBOT-ASSISTED LAPAROSCOPIC RADICAL PROSTATECTOMY
    Labanaris, Apostolos P.
    Wagner, Christian
    Witt, Jorn H.
    Zugor, Vahudin
    JOURNAL OF ENDOUROLOGY, 2012, 26 : A224 - A224
  • [39] Positive Margins in pT2 Prostate Cancer in Open, Laparoscopic and Robot-Assisted Radical Prostatectomy Specimens
    Troncoso, P.
    Matin, S.
    Babaian, R. J.
    Pettaway, C. A.
    Pisters, L. L.
    Prokhorova, I.
    Davis, J. W.
    MODERN PATHOLOGY, 2010, 23 : 222A - 223A
  • [40] Patients with prior TURP undergoing robot-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy have higher positive surgical margin rates
    Hampton L.
    Nelson R.A.
    Satterthwaite R.
    Wilson T.
    Crocitto L.
    Journal of Robotic Surgery, 2008, 2 (4) : 213 - 216