Testing general relativity with the BepiColombo radio science experiment

被引:94
|
作者
Milani, A
Vokrouhlicky, D
Villani, D
Bonanno, C
Rossi, A
机构
[1] Univ Pisa, Dipartimento Matemat, I-56127 Pisa, Italy
[2] Charles Univ Prague, Inst Astron, CZ-18000 Prague 8, Czech Republic
[3] Hyperborea SCRL, Polo Tecnol, I-56023 Pisa, Italy
[4] Univ Pisa, Dipartimento Matemat, I-56100 Pisa, Italy
[5] CNR, ISTI, Area Ric, I-56100 Pisa, Italy
来源
PHYSICAL REVIEW D | 2002年 / 66卷 / 08期
关键词
D O I
10.1103/PhysRevD.66.082001
中图分类号
P1 [天文学];
学科分类号
0704 ;
摘要
The ESA mission BepiColombo will explore the planet Mercury with equipment allowing an extremely accurate tracking. While determining its orbit around Mercury, it will be possible to indirectly observe the motion of its center of mass, with an accuracy several orders of magnitude better than what is possible by radar ranging to the planet's surface. This is an opportunity to conduct a relativity experiment which will be a modern version of the traditional tests of general relativity, based upon Mercury's perihelion advance and the relativistic light propagation near the Sun. We define the mathematical methods to be used to extract from the data of the BepiColombo mission, as presently designed, the best constraints on the main post-Newtonian parameters, especially beta,gamma and the Nordtvedt parameter eta, but also the dynamic oblateness of the Sun J(2) and the preferred frame parameters alpha(1),alpha(2). We have performed a full cycle simulation of the BepiColombo radio science experiments, including this relativity experiment, with the purpose of assessing in a realistic (as opposed to formal) way the accuracy achievable on each parameter of interest. For gamma the best constraint can be obtained by means of a dedicated superior conjunction experiment, with a realistic accuracy similar or equal to2x10(-6). For beta the main problem is the very strong correlation with J(2); if the Nordtvedt relationship eta=4beta-gamma-3 is used, as it is legitimate in the metric theories of gravitation, a realistic accuracy of similar or equal to2x10(-6) for beta and similar or equal to2x10(-9) for J(2) can be achieved, while eta itself is constrained within similar or equal to10(-5). If the preferred frame parameters alpha(1),alpha(2) are included in the analysis, they can be constrained within similar or equal to8x10(-6) and similar or equal to10(-6), respectively, at the price of some degradation in beta, J(2) and eta. It is also possible to test the change with time of the gravitational constant G, but the results are severely limited because of the problems of absolute calibration of the ranging transponder, to the point that the improvement as compared with other techniques (such as lunar laser ranging) is not so important.
引用
收藏
页数:21
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] An analysis of the geodesy and relativity experiments of BepiColombo
    Imperi, Luigi
    Iess, Luciano
    Mariani, Mirco J.
    ICARUS, 2018, 301 : 9 - 25
  • [42] On the BepiColombo and Juno Radio Science Experiments: precise models and critical estimates
    Tommei, Giacomo
    De Marchi, Fabrizio
    Serra, Daniele
    Schettino, Giulia
    2015 2ND IEEE INTERNATIONAL WORKSHOP ON METROLOGY FOR AEROSPACE (METROAEROSPACE), 2015, : 323 - 328
  • [43] Testing General Relativity on cosmological scales
    Pouri, Athina S.
    Basilakos, Spyros
    4TH INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON MATHEMATICAL MODELING IN PHYSICAL SCIENCES (IC-MSQUARE2015), 2015, 633
  • [44] Testing the Foundations of the Foundations of General Relativity
    Laemmerzahl, Claus
    GRAVITATIONAL PHYSICS: TESTING GRAVITY FROM SUBMILLIMETER TO COSMIC SCALE, 2010, 1256 : 51 - 65
  • [45] Testing general relativity with atom interferometry
    Dimopoulos, Savas
    Graham, Peter W.
    Hogan, Jason M.
    Kasevich, Mark A.
    PHYSICAL REVIEW LETTERS, 2007, 98 (11)
  • [46] Testing General Relativity with Atomic Clocks
    S. Reynaud
    C. Salomon
    P. Wolf
    Space Science Reviews, 2009, 148 : 233 - 247
  • [47] Testing General Relativity with Atomic Clocks
    Reynaud, S.
    Salomon, C.
    Wolf, P.
    SPACE SCIENCE REVIEWS, 2009, 148 (1-4) : 233 - 247
  • [48] Testing General Relativity with Juno at Jupiter
    Durante, Daniele
    Cappuccio, P.
    di Stefano, I.
    Zannoni, M.
    Casajus, L. Gomez
    Lari, G.
    Falletta, M.
    Buccino, D. R.
    Iess, L.
    Park, R. S.
    Bolton, S. J.
    ASTROPHYSICAL JOURNAL, 2024, 971 (02):
  • [49] Testing General Relativity with Pulsar Timing
    Ingrid H. Stairs
    Living Reviews in Relativity, 2003, 6 (1)
  • [50] General Relativity Testing in Exoplanetary Systems
    Gou, Xirui
    Pan, Xinyue
    Wang, Le
    3RD INTERNATIONAL FORUM ON GEOSCIENCE AND GEODESY, 2021, 658