Surveillance of colonic polyps: are we getting it right?

被引:55
|
作者
Bonnington, Stewart N. [1 ,2 ]
Rutter, Matthew D. [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Hosp North Tees, Dept Gastroenterol, Hardwick Rd, Stockton On Tees TS19 8PE, England
[2] Univ Durham, Stockton On Tees TS17 6BH, England
关键词
Adenoma; polyp; colonoscopy; surveillance; colorectal cancer; LONG-TERM RISK; COLORECTAL-CANCER; NATURAL-HISTORY; FOLLOW-UP; COLONOSCOPY SURVEILLANCE; SCREENING COLONOSCOPY; ASYMPTOMATIC ADULTS; ADVANCED NEOPLASIA; ADENOMA DETECTION; NATIONAL POLYP;
D O I
10.3748/wjg.v22.i6.1925
中图分类号
R57 [消化系及腹部疾病];
学科分类号
摘要
Colorectal cancer (CRC) is the third most commonly diagnosed cancer worldwide. The identification of colonic polyps can reduce CRC mortality through earlier diagnosis of cancers and the removal of polyps: the removal of colonic polyps at an initial colonoscopy, some patients are at an increased risk of developing CRC in the future. This is the rationale for post-polypectomy surveillance colonoscopy. However, not all individuals found to have colonic adenomas have a risk of CRC higher than that of the general population. This review examines the literature on post-polypectomy surveillance including current international clinical guidelines. The potential benefits of surveillance procedures must be weighed against the burden of colonoscopy: resource use, the potential for patient discomfort, and the risk of complications. Therefore surveillance colonoscopy is best utilised in a selected group of individuals at a high risk of developing cancer. Further study is needed into the specific factors conferring higher risk as well as the efficacy of surveillance in mitigating this risk. Such evidence will better inform clinicians and patients of the relative benefits of colonoscopic surveillance for the individual. In addition, the decision to continue with surveillance must be informed by the changing profile of risks and benefits of further procedures with the patient's advancing age.
引用
收藏
页码:1925 / 1934
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Metformin and colonic polyps in acromegaly: is the solution closer than we think?
    Niculescu, Dan Alexandru
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF ENDOCRINOLOGY, 2021, 184 (05) : C9 - C11
  • [42] Prevalence of Adenomas on Surveillance Colonoscopies for Patients with a History of Colonic Polyps of Unknown Histology
    Doyle, John B.
    Krigel, Anna
    Lebwohl, Benjamin
    DIGESTIVE DISEASES AND SCIENCES, 2022, 67 (07) : 3239 - 3243
  • [43] Is stopping surveillance for adenomatous polyps safe after a normal colonoscopy? A prospective study assessing second surveillance colonoscopies for personal history of colonic polyps
    Gofton, C.
    Reynauld, B.
    Rasouli, K.
    Gilbert, D.
    JOURNAL OF GASTROENTEROLOGY AND HEPATOLOGY, 2020, 35 : 225 - 225
  • [44] Prevalence of Adenomas on Surveillance Colonoscopies for Patients with a History of Colonic Polyps of Unknown Histology
    John B. Doyle
    Anna Krigel
    Benjamin Lebwohl
    Digestive Diseases and Sciences, 2022, 67 : 3239 - 3243
  • [45] CHARACTERIZATION OF COLONIC POLYPS IN PATIENTS WITH CYSTIC FIBROSIS UNDERGOING SCREENING OR SURVEILLANCE COLONOSCOPY
    Herzog, T.
    Baloun, B.
    McAllister, S.
    Dunitz, J.
    Khoruts, A.
    Billings, J. L.
    PEDIATRIC PULMONOLOGY, 2011, : 393 - 393
  • [46] Managing Malignant Colonic Polyps Detected at Bowel Cancer Screening: Surveillance or Resection?
    Wood, S.
    Milligan, C.
    Davies, R.
    Stephenson, B.
    Williams, G.
    BRITISH JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 2015, 102 : 191 - 191
  • [47] Colonic adenoma patients have higher incidence of hyperplastic polyps on surveillance colonoscopy
    Qasim, Asghar
    Muldoon, Cian
    McKiernan, Susan
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY, 2009, 21 (08) : 877 - 881
  • [48] The Australian Managed Entry Scheme: Are We Getting it Right?
    Tuffaha, Haitham W.
    Scuffham, Paul A.
    PHARMACOECONOMICS, 2018, 36 (05) : 555 - 565
  • [49] Engaging family practitioners in research: are we getting it right?
    Graffy, Jonathan
    FAMILY PRACTICE, 2008, 25 (02) : 69 - 70
  • [50] Regulatory decision-making: are we getting it right?
    Evans, Stephen J. W.
    Leufkens, Hubert G. M.
    PHARMACOEPIDEMIOLOGY AND DRUG SAFETY, 2014, 23 (10) : 1012 - 1016