The time course of top-down control on saccade averaging

被引:23
|
作者
Heeman, J. [1 ]
Theeuwes, J. [2 ]
Van der Stigchel, S. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Utrecht, Helmholtz Inst, Utrecht, Netherlands
[2] Vrije Univ, Dept Cognit Psychol, Amsterdam, Netherlands
关键词
Global effect; Saccade averaging; Top-down control; Time course; Task demand; Inter-trial priming; COMPETITIVE INTEGRATION; NONTARGET STIMULI; TARGET; LATENCY; MODEL; DISCRIMINATION; DISTRACTORS; DEPENDENCE; SELECTION; SEARCH;
D O I
10.1016/j.visres.2014.03.007
中图分类号
Q189 [神经科学];
学科分类号
071006 ;
摘要
When objects in a visual scene are positioned in close proximity, eye movements to these objects tend to land at an intermediate location between the objects (i.e. the global effect). This effect is most pronounced for short latency saccades and is therefore believed to be reflexive and dominantly controlled by bottom-up information. At longer latencies this effect can be modulated by top-down factors. The current study established the time course at which top-down information starts to have an influence on bottom-up averaging. In a standard global effect task two peripheral stimuli (a red and a green abrupt onset) were positioned within an angular distance of 20. In the condition in which observers received no specific target instruction, the eyes landed in between the red and green element establishing the classic global effect. However, when observers were instructed to make a saccade to the red element during a whole block or when the target color varied from trial-to-trial (red or green), a clear effect of the target instruction on the accuracy of the landing position of the primary saccade was found. With increasing saccade latencies, the eyes landed closer to the instructed target. Crucially, however, this effect was even seen for the shortest saccade latencies (as early as 200 ins), suggesting that saccade averaging is affected early on by top-down processes. (c) 2014 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:29 / 37
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Top-down control of visual attention
    Noudoost, Behrad
    Chang, Mindy H.
    Steinmetz, Nicholas A.
    Moore, Tirin
    CURRENT OPINION IN NEUROBIOLOGY, 2010, 20 (02) : 183 - 190
  • [22] Top-down control on water subduction
    Donna J. Shillington
    Nature Geoscience, 2022, 15 : 94 - 95
  • [23] Top-Down Control in Contour Grouping
    Volberg, Gregor
    Wutz, Andreas
    Greenlee, Mark W.
    PLOS ONE, 2013, 8 (01):
  • [24] The time course of activity in dorsolateral prefrontal cortex and anterior cingulate cortex during top-down attentional control
    Silton, Rebecca Levin
    Heller, Wendy
    Towers, David N.
    Engels, Anna S.
    Spielberg, Jeffrey M.
    Edgar, J. Christopher
    Sass, Sarah M.
    Stewart, Jennifer L.
    Sutton, Bradley P.
    Banich, Marie T.
    Miller, Gregory A.
    NEUROIMAGE, 2010, 50 (03) : 1292 - 1302
  • [25] Top-down Causation Without Top-down Causes
    Carl F. Craver
    William Bechtel
    Biology & Philosophy, 2007, 22 : 547 - 563
  • [26] Top-down causation without top-down causes
    Craver, Carl F.
    Bechtel, William
    BIOLOGY & PHILOSOPHY, 2007, 22 (04) : 547 - 563
  • [27] The Time-Course of Ultrarapid Categorization: The Influence of Scene Congruency and Top-Down Processing
    Vanmarcke, Steven
    Calders, Filip
    Wagemans, Johan
    I-PERCEPTION, 2016, 7 (05): : 1 - 23
  • [28] Seeing the Same Words Differently: The Time Course of Automaticity and Top-Down Intention in Reading
    Strijkers, Kristof
    Bertrand, Daisy
    Grainger, Jonathan
    JOURNAL OF COGNITIVE NEUROSCIENCE, 2015, 27 (08) : 1542 - 1551
  • [29] Why does saccade execution increase episodic memory retrieval? A test of the top-down attentional control hypothesis
    Lyle, Keith B.
    Edlin, James M.
    MEMORY, 2015, 23 (02) : 187 - 202
  • [30] A buffer control method for top-down project control
    Martens, Annelies
    Vanhoucke, Mario
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF OPERATIONAL RESEARCH, 2017, 262 (01) : 274 - 286