Genomic selection strategies in a small dairy cattle population evaluated for genetic gain and profit

被引:43
|
作者
Thomasen, J. R. [1 ,2 ]
Egger-Danner, C. [3 ]
Willam, A. [4 ]
Guldbrandtsen, B. [2 ]
Lund, M. S. [2 ]
Sorensen, A. C. [2 ]
机构
[1] VikingGenetics, DK-8860 Assentoft, Denmark
[2] Aarhus Univ, Fac Sci & Technol, Dept Mol Biol & Genet, Ctr Quantitat Genet & Genom, DK-8960 Tjele, Denmark
[3] ZuchtData EDV Dienstleistungen GmbH, A-1200 Vienna, Austria
[4] Univ Nat Resources & Life Sci Vienna BOKU, Dept Sustainable Agr Syst, Div Livestock Sci, A-1180 Vienna, Austria
关键词
genomic selection; genomic breeding scheme; dairy cattle; small population; BREEDING VALUES; RELATIONSHIP INFORMATION; WIDE SELECTION; DANISH JERSEY; MULTI-BREED; PREDICTIONS; PROGRAMS; CHALLENGES; ACCURACY; IMPACT;
D O I
10.3168/jds.2013-6599
中图分类号
S8 [畜牧、 动物医学、狩猎、蚕、蜂];
学科分类号
0905 ;
摘要
The objective of this study was to evaluate a genomic breeding scheme in a small dairy cattle population that was intermediate in terms of using both young bulls (YB) and progeny-tested bulls (PB). This scheme was compared with a conventional progeny testing program without use of genomic information and, as the extreme case, a juvenile scheme with genomic information, where all bulls were used before progeny information was available. The population structure, cost, and breeding plan parameters were chosen to reflect the Danish Jersey cattle population, being representative for a small dairy cattle population. The population consisted of 68,000 registered cows. Annually, 1,500 bull dams were screened to produce the 500 genotyped bull calves from which 60 YB were selected to be progeny tested. Two unfavorably correlated traits were included in the breeding goal, a production trait (h(2) = 0.30) and a functional trait (h(2) = 0.04). An increase in reliability of 5 percentage points for each trait was used in the default genomic scenario. A deterministic approach was used to model the different breeding programs, where the primary evaluation criterion was annual monetary genetic gain (AMGG). Discounted profit was used as an indicator of the economic outcome. We investigated the effect of varying the following parameters: (1) increase in reliability due to genomic information, (2) number of genotyped bull calves, (3) proportion of bull dam sires that are young bulls, and (4) proportion of cow sires that are young bulls. The genomic breeding scheme was both genetically and economically superior to the conventional breeding scheme, even in a small dairy cattle population where genomic information causes a relatively low increase in reliability of breeding values. Assuming low reliabilities of genomic predictions, the Optimal breeding scheme according to AMGG was characterized by mixed use of YB and PB as bull sires. Exclusive use of YB for production cows increased AMGG up to 3 percentage points. The results from this study supported our hypothesis that strong interaction effects exist. The strongest interaction effects were obtained between increased reliabilities of genomic estimated breeding values and more intensive use of YB. The juvenile scheme was genetically inferior when the increase in reliability was low (5 percentage points), but became genetically superior at higher reliabilities of genomic estimated breeding values. The juvenile scheme was always superior according to discounted profit because of the shorter generation interval and minimizing costs for housing and feeding waiting bulls.
引用
收藏
页码:458 / 470
页数:13
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Changes in genetic trends in US dairy cattle since the implementation of genomic selection
    Guinan, F. L.
    Wiggans, G. R.
    Norman, H. D.
    Durr, J. W.
    Cole, J. B.
    Van Tassell, C. P.
    Misztal, I.
    Lourenco, D.
    JOURNAL OF DAIRY SCIENCE, 2023, 106 (02) : 1110 - 1129
  • [22] Genomic analysis reveals population structure and selection signatures in plateau dairy cattle
    Huang, Shangzhen
    Ma, Longgang
    Li, Bin
    Dou, Jinhuan
    Xu, Qing
    Wang, Yachun
    BMC GENOMICS, 2025, 26 (01):
  • [23] Genomic selection in United States dairy cattle
    Wiggans, George R. R.
    Carrillo, Jose A.
    FRONTIERS IN GENETICS, 2022, 13
  • [24] Genomic selection for feed efficiency in dairy cattle
    Pryce, J. E.
    Wales, W. J.
    de Haas, Y.
    Veerkamp, R. F.
    Hayes, B. J.
    ANIMAL, 2014, 8 (01) : 1 - 10
  • [25] Reproductive technologies and genomic selection in dairy cattle
    Ponsart, C.
    Le Bourhis, D.
    Knijn, H.
    Fritz, S.
    Guyader-Joly, C.
    Otter, T.
    Lacaze, S.
    Charreaux, F.
    Schibler, L.
    Dupassieux, D.
    Mullaart, E.
    REPRODUCTION FERTILITY AND DEVELOPMENT, 2014, 26 (01) : 12 - 21
  • [26] Optimum multistage genomic selection in dairy cattle
    Boerner, V.
    Teuscher, F.
    Reinsch, N.
    JOURNAL OF DAIRY SCIENCE, 2012, 95 (04) : 2097 - 2107
  • [27] Genomic selection in dairy cattle simulated populations
    Seno, Leonardo de Oliveira
    Freire Guidolin, Diego Gomes
    Aspilcueta-Borquis, Rusbel Raul
    do Nascimento, Guilherme Batista
    Ribeiro da Silva, Thiago Bruno
    de Oliveira, Henrique Nunes
    Munari, Danisio Prado
    JOURNAL OF DAIRY RESEARCH, 2018, 85 (02) : 125 - 132
  • [28] Simulating the potential of genomic selection in dairy cattle
    Colleau, J. -J.
    Fritz, S.
    Guillaume, F.
    Baur, A.
    Dupassieux, D.
    Boscher, M. -Y.
    Journaux, L.
    Eggen, A.
    Boichard, D.
    INRA PRODUCTIONS ANIMALES, 2015, 28 (03): : 251 - 258
  • [29] Genomic Selection in Dairy Cattle: The USDA Experience
    Wiggans, George R.
    Cole, John B.
    Hubbard, Suzanne M.
    Sonstegard, Tad S.
    ANNUAL REVIEW OF ANIMAL BIOSCIENCES, VOL 5, 2017, 5 : 309 - 327
  • [30] Genomic selection, a revolution in dairy cattle breeding?
    Veerkamp, R. F.
    REPRODUCTION IN DOMESTIC ANIMALS, 2010, 45 : 52 - 52