Life cycle assessment of primary magnesium production using the Pidgeon process in China

被引:34
|
作者
Gao, Feng [1 ]
Nie, Zuoren [1 ]
Wang, Zhihong [1 ]
Gong, Xianzheng [1 ]
Zuo, Tieyong [1 ]
机构
[1] Beijing Univ Technol, Coll Mat Sci & Engn, Ctr Natl Mat Life Cycle Assessment, Beijing 100124, Peoples R China
来源
基金
北京市自然科学基金; 中国国家自然科学基金;
关键词
Life cycle assessment (LCA); Primary magnesium production; Pidgeon process; Energy use strategies; China; IMPACT; COKE;
D O I
10.1007/s11367-009-0101-9
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
China has been the largest primary magnesium producer in the world since year 2000 and is an important part of the global magnesium supply chain. Almost all of the primary magnesium in China is produced using the Pidgeon process invented in the 1940s in Canada. The environmental problems of the primary magnesium production with the Pidgeon process have already attracted much attention of the local government and enterprises. The main purposes of this research are to investigate the environmental impacts of magnesium production and to determine the accumulative environmental performances of three different scenarios. System boundary included the cradle-to-gate life cycle of magnesium production, including dolomite ore extraction, ferrosilicon production, the Pidgeon process, transportation of materials, and emissions from thermal power plant. The life cycle assessment (LCA) case study was performed on three different fuel use scenarios from coal as the overall fuel to two kinds of gaseous fuels, the producer gas and coke oven gas. The burden use of gaseous fuels was also considered. The procedures, details, and results obtained are based on the application of the existing international standards of LCA, i.e., the ISO 14040. Depletion of abiotic resources, global warming, acidification, and human toxicity were adopted as the midpoint impact categories developed by the problem-oriented approach of CML to estimate the characterized results of the case study. The local characterization and normalization factors of abiotic resources were used to calculate abiotic depletion potential (ADP). The analytic hierarchy process was used to determine the weight factors. Using the Umberto version 4.0, the emissions of dolomite ore extraction were estimated and the transportation models of the three scenarios were designed. The emissions inventory showed that both the Pidgeon process of magnesium production and the Fe-Si production were mainly to blame for the total pollutant emissions in the life cycle of magnesium production. The characterized results indicated that ADP, acidification potential, and human toxicity potential decreased cumulatively from scenarios 1 to 3, with the exception of global warming potential. The final single scores indicated that the accumulative environmental performance of scenario 3 was the best compared with scenarios 1 and 2. The impact of abiotic resources depletion deserves more attention although the types and the amount of mineral resources for Mg production are abundant in China. This study suggested that producer gas was an alternative fuel for magnesium production rather than the coal burned directly in areas where the cost of oven gas-produced coke is high. The utilization of "clean" energy and the reduction of greenhouse gases and acidic gases emission were the main goals of the technological improvements and cleaner production of the magnesium industry in China. This paper has demonstrated that the theory and method of LCA are actually helpful for the research on the accumulative environmental performance of primary magnesium production. Further studies with "cradle-to-cradle" scheme are recommended. Furthermore, other energy sources used in magnesium production and the cost of energy production could be treated in further research.
引用
收藏
页码:480 / 489
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Life cycle assessment of primary magnesium production using the Pidgeon process in China
    Feng Gao
    Zuoren Nie
    Zhihong Wang
    Xianzheng Gong
    Tieyong Zuo
    [J]. The International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment, 2009, 14 : 480 - 489
  • [2] Assessing environmental impact of magnesium production using Pidgeon process in China
    高峰
    聂祚仁
    王志宏
    龚先政
    左铁镛
    [J]. Transactions of Nonferrous Metals Society of China, 2008, (03) : 749 - 754
  • [3] Assessing environmental impact of magnesium production using Pidgeon process in China
    Gao Feng
    Nie Zuo-ren
    Wang Zhi-hong
    Gong Xian-zheng
    Zuo Tie-yong
    [J]. TRANSACTIONS OF NONFERROUS METALS SOCIETY OF CHINA, 2008, 18 (03) : 749 - 754
  • [4] Life cycle greenhouse gases, energy and cost assessment of automobiles using magnesium from Chinese Pidgeon process
    Du, Jindan
    Han, Weijian
    Peng, Yinghong
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CLEANER PRODUCTION, 2010, 18 (02) : 112 - 119
  • [5] Global warming impact of the magnesium produced in China using the Pidgeon process
    Ramakrishnan, S
    Koltun, P
    [J]. RESOURCES CONSERVATION AND RECYCLING, 2004, 42 (01) : 49 - 64
  • [6] THE PROBLEM OF LIMITED RECOVERIES IN THE PIDGEON PROCESS FOR MAGNESIUM PRODUCTION
    WYNNYCKYJ, JR
    TACKIE, E
    CHEN, G
    [J]. CANADIAN METALLURGICAL QUARTERLY, 1991, 30 (03) : 139 - 143
  • [7] Life cycle assessment of magnesium phosphate cement production
    Shen, Xiaoxiao
    Wang, Xin
    Li, Kai
    Hu, Xiang
    Shi, Caijun
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CLEANER PRODUCTION, 2024, 467
  • [8] Life cycle assessment of gold production in China
    Chen, Wei
    Geng, Yong
    Hong, Jinglan
    Dong, Huijuan
    Cui, Xiaowei
    Sun, Mingxing
    Zhang, Qiang
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CLEANER PRODUCTION, 2018, 179 : 143 - 150
  • [9] Life cycle assessment of biodiesel production in China
    Liang, Sai
    Xu, Ming
    Zhang, Tianzhu
    [J]. BIORESOURCE TECHNOLOGY, 2013, 129 : 72 - 77
  • [10] IMPROVEMENT OF MODELING ON THE PIDGEON PROCESS FOR MAGNESIUM PRODUCTION BY INTRODUCING THE VARIABLE THERMOPHYSICAL PROPERTIES
    Li, R. -B.
    Wang, C.
    Wang, Z.
    Yang, P. -X.
    Xue, F.
    Liu, F. -Q.
    Zhang, S. -J.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF MINING AND METALLURGY SECTION B-METALLURGY, 2022, 58 (03) : 451 - 459