Life cycle assessment of biodiesel production in China

被引:94
|
作者
Liang, Sai [1 ]
Xu, Ming [2 ,3 ]
Zhang, Tianzhu [1 ]
机构
[1] Tsinghua Univ, Sch Environm, State Key Joint Lab Environm Simulat & Pollut Con, Being 100084, Peoples R China
[2] Univ Michigan, Sch Nat Resources & Environm, Ann Arbor, MI 48109 USA
[3] Univ Michigan, Dept Civil & Environm Engn, Ann Arbor, MI 48109 USA
基金
美国国家科学基金会;
关键词
Agriculture; Bioenergy; Biofuel; Input-output analysis; Life cycle assessment; LAND-USE; BIOFUELS; WATER; MODEL; OIL;
D O I
10.1016/j.biortech.2012.11.037
中图分类号
S2 [农业工程];
学科分类号
0828 ;
摘要
This study aims to evaluate energy, economic, and environmental performances of seven categories of biodiesel feedstocks by using the mixed-unit input-output life cycle assessment method. Various feedstocks have different environmental performances, indicating potential environmental problem-shift. Jatropha seed, castor seed, waste cooking oil, and waste extraction oil are preferred feedstocks for biodiesel production in the short term. Positive net energy yields and positive net economic benefits of biodiesel from these four feedstocks are 2.3-52.0% of their life cycle energy demands and 74.1-448.4% of their economic costs, respectively. Algae are preferred in the long term mainly due to their less arable land demands. Special attention should be paid to potential environmental problems accompanying feedstock choice: freshwater use, ecotoxicity potentials, photochemical oxidation potential, acidification potential and eutrophication potential. Moreover, key processes are identified by sensitivity analysis to direct future technology improvements. Finally, supporting measures are proposed to optimize China's biodiesel development. (C) 2012 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:72 / 77
页数:6
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Potential and life cycle assessment of biodiesel production in China
    Guo, Rui
    Hanaki, Keisuke
    [J]. JOURNAL OF RENEWABLE AND SUSTAINABLE ENERGY, 2010, 2 (03)
  • [2] Life cycle assessment and life cycle cost analysis of Jatropha biodiesel production in China
    Liu, Yanbing
    Zhu, Zongyuan
    Zhang, Rui
    Zhao, Xubo
    [J]. BIOMASS CONVERSION AND BIOREFINERY, 2022, 14 (22) : 28635 - 28660
  • [3] Life cycle assessment of Jatropha jet biodiesel production in China conditions
    Liu, Haoyu
    Qiu, Tong
    [J]. 29TH EUROPEAN SYMPOSIUM ON COMPUTER AIDED PROCESS ENGINEERING, PT B, 2019, 46 : 1555 - 1560
  • [4] LIFE CYCLE ASSESSMENT FOR THE PRODUCTION OF PALM BIODIESEL
    Liang, Yung Chee
    Subramaniam, Vijaya
    Yusoff, Sumiani
    [J]. JOURNAL OF OIL PALM RESEARCH, 2021, 33 (01): : 140 - 150
  • [5] Life cycle assessment of biodiesel production from jatropha
    Kaewcharoensombat, Uraiwan
    Prommetta, Kant
    Srinophakun, Thongchai
    [J]. JOURNAL OF THE TAIWAN INSTITUTE OF CHEMICAL ENGINEERS, 2011, 42 (03) : 454 - 462
  • [6] Life Cycle Assessment of Palm Oil Biodiesel Production in Malaysia
    Ashnani, M. H. Mohammadi
    Johari, A.
    Hashim, H.
    Hasani, E.
    [J]. 4TH MECHANICAL AND MANUFACTURING ENGINEERING, PTS 1 AND 2, 2014, 465-466 : 1080 - 1086
  • [7] Life cycle assessment: heterotrophic cultivation of thraustochytrids for biodiesel production
    Kim Jye Lee Chang
    Lucas Rye
    Graeme A. Dunstan
    Tim Grant
    Anthony Koutoulis
    Peter D. Nichols
    Susan I. Blackburn
    [J]. Journal of Applied Phycology, 2015, 27 : 639 - 647
  • [8] Life cycle assessment: heterotrophic cultivation of thraustochytrids for biodiesel production
    Chang, Kim Jye Lee
    Rye, Lucas
    Dunstan, Graeme A.
    Grant, Tim
    Koutoulis, Anthony
    Nichols, Peter D.
    Blackburn, Susan I.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF APPLIED PHYCOLOGY, 2015, 27 (02) : 639 - 647
  • [9] Social life cycle assessment of feedstocks for biodiesel production in Brazil
    Costa, Marina Weyl
    Oliveira, Amir A. M.
    [J]. RENEWABLE & SUSTAINABLE ENERGY REVIEWS, 2022, 159
  • [10] Biodiesel Production in a Semiarid Environment: A Life Cycle Assessment Approach
    Biswas, Wahidul K.
    Barton, Louise
    Carter, Daniel
    [J]. ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY, 2011, 45 (07) : 3069 - 3074