US federal government subsidies for clean energy: Design choices and implications

被引:36
|
作者
Newell, Richard G. [1 ,2 ]
Pizer, William A. [1 ,3 ,4 ,5 ]
Raimi, Daniel [1 ,6 ,7 ]
机构
[1] Resources Future Inc, Washington, DC 20036 USA
[2] Duke Univ, Nicholas Sch Environm, Durham, NC 27706 USA
[3] Duke Univ, Sanford Sch, Durham, NC 27706 USA
[4] Duke Univ, Nicholas Inst Environm Policy Solut, Durham, NC 27706 USA
[5] Natl Bur Econ Res, Cambridge, MA 02138 USA
[6] Univ Michigan, Gerald R Ford Sch Publ Policy, Ann Arbor, MI 48109 USA
[7] Univ Michigan, Energy Inst, Ann Arbor, MI 48109 USA
关键词
Energy subsidies; Clean energy; Renewable energy; Tax credits; Loan guarantees; GREENHOUSE-GAS EMISSIONS; RENEWABLE ENERGY; COST-EFFECTIVENESS; EFFICIENCY GAP; AIR-QUALITY; POLICIES; BENEFITS; INVESTMENT; ECONOMY; OIL;
D O I
10.1016/j.eneco.2019.02.018
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
Subsidies for clean energy deployment have become a major component of U.S. federal energy and climate policy. After a surge in spending under the American Recovery and Reinvestment Act of 2009, they are an even larger component but now face increased scrutiny. Given their lasting presence, how does one design these subsidies to be as cost-effective as possible? Surprisingly, the conceptual framework and empirical evidence available to help policymakers identify which subsidies generate the most "bang for the buck" are limited. To help answer this question, we begin with an overview of the justifications for, and the arguments against, subsidizing clean energy technologies. Next, we briefly describe major subsidies. Finally, we summarize key design choices, suggesting an increased focus on upfront cash payments for physical outcomes such as capacity. This contrasts with the considerable focus on tax credits, loan guarantees, production, and cost-based subsidies which have been more prominent to date. (C) 2019 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:831 / 841
页数:11
相关论文
共 50 条