US federal government subsidies for clean energy: Design choices and implications

被引:36
|
作者
Newell, Richard G. [1 ,2 ]
Pizer, William A. [1 ,3 ,4 ,5 ]
Raimi, Daniel [1 ,6 ,7 ]
机构
[1] Resources Future Inc, Washington, DC 20036 USA
[2] Duke Univ, Nicholas Sch Environm, Durham, NC 27706 USA
[3] Duke Univ, Sanford Sch, Durham, NC 27706 USA
[4] Duke Univ, Nicholas Inst Environm Policy Solut, Durham, NC 27706 USA
[5] Natl Bur Econ Res, Cambridge, MA 02138 USA
[6] Univ Michigan, Gerald R Ford Sch Publ Policy, Ann Arbor, MI 48109 USA
[7] Univ Michigan, Energy Inst, Ann Arbor, MI 48109 USA
关键词
Energy subsidies; Clean energy; Renewable energy; Tax credits; Loan guarantees; GREENHOUSE-GAS EMISSIONS; RENEWABLE ENERGY; COST-EFFECTIVENESS; EFFICIENCY GAP; AIR-QUALITY; POLICIES; BENEFITS; INVESTMENT; ECONOMY; OIL;
D O I
10.1016/j.eneco.2019.02.018
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
Subsidies for clean energy deployment have become a major component of U.S. federal energy and climate policy. After a surge in spending under the American Recovery and Reinvestment Act of 2009, they are an even larger component but now face increased scrutiny. Given their lasting presence, how does one design these subsidies to be as cost-effective as possible? Surprisingly, the conceptual framework and empirical evidence available to help policymakers identify which subsidies generate the most "bang for the buck" are limited. To help answer this question, we begin with an overview of the justifications for, and the arguments against, subsidizing clean energy technologies. Next, we briefly describe major subsidies. Finally, we summarize key design choices, suggesting an increased focus on upfront cash payments for physical outcomes such as capacity. This contrasts with the considerable focus on tax credits, loan guarantees, production, and cost-based subsidies which have been more prominent to date. (C) 2019 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:831 / 841
页数:11
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] The Use of Design Thinking in the US Federal Government
    Liedtka, Jeanne
    Sheikh, Awais
    Gilmer, Cynthia
    Kupetz, Marilyn
    Wilcox, Lynette
    [J]. PUBLIC PERFORMANCE & MANAGEMENT REVIEW, 2020, 43 (01) : 157 - 179
  • [2] A half century of US federal government energy incentives: value, distribution, and policy implications
    Bezdek, Roger
    Wendling, Robert
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF GLOBAL ENERGY ISSUES, 2007, 27 (01) : 42 - 60
  • [3] Energy Implications of IO Interface Design Choices
    Sundar, Sidharth
    Simpson, William
    Higdon, Jacob
    Whitaker, Caeden
    Harris, Bryan
    Altiparmak, Nihat
    [J]. PROCEEDINGS OF THE 2023 15TH ACM WORKSHOP ON HOT TOPICS IN STORAGE AND FILE SYSTEMS, HOTSTORAGE 2023, 2023, : 58 - 64
  • [4] Energy poverty and government subsidies in China
    Gu, Jiafeng
    [J]. ENERGY POLICY, 2023, 180
  • [5] The energy use implications of design choices in commercial buildings
    Kelsey, J
    Beckman, WA
    Mitchell, JW
    [J]. PROCEEDINGS OF THE 21ST NATIONAL PASSIVE SOLAR CONFERENCE, 1996, : 315 - 320
  • [6] Beyond A single stimulus: How to leverage the federal government to advance clean energy innovation?
    Heard, Brent R.
    Kerxhalli-Kleinfield, Michaela
    Holmes, K. John
    [J]. ISCIENCE, 2022, 25 (06)
  • [7] How government subsidies promote the growth of entrepreneurial companies in clean energy industry: An empirical study in China
    Peng, Huatao
    Liu, Yang
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CLEANER PRODUCTION, 2018, 188 : 508 - 520
  • [8] Choices on the road to the clean energy future
    Cash, David W.
    [J]. ENERGY RESEARCH & SOCIAL SCIENCE, 2018, 35 : 224 - 226
  • [9] A Federal US Carbon Tax: Major Design Decisions and Implications
    Bordoff, Jason
    Kaufman, Noah
    [J]. JOULE, 2018, 2 (12) : 2487 - 2491
  • [10] Ensuring the Best Use of Federal Energy Subsidies
    Hall, Keith B.
    [J]. POWER, 2012, 156 (05) : 112 - 112