RETRACTED: Nicorandil vs nifedipine for the treatment of preterm labour: a randomized clinical trial (Retracted article. See vol. 277, pg. 7, 2022)

被引:6
|
作者
Rezk, M. [1 ]
Sayyed, T. [1 ]
Masood, A. [1 ]
Dawood, R. [1 ]
机构
[1] Menoufia Univ, Fac Med, Dept Obstet & Gynaecol, Menoufia, Egypt
关键词
Preterm labour; Oral tocolytics; Nicorandil; Nifedipine; POTASSIUM CHANNELS; THERAPY;
D O I
10.1016/j.ejogrb.2015.09.038
中图分类号
R71 [妇产科学];
学科分类号
100211 ;
摘要
Objective: To compare the effectiveness of the potassium channel opener nicorandil with the calcium channel blocker nifedipine for tocolysis in preterm labour. Methods: A randomized clinical trial of 200 pregnant women in preterm labour was conducted at Menoufia University Hospital, Egypt. Eligible women were assigned at random into two groups: 100 women received nicorandil and 100 women received nifedipine. Prolongation of pregnancy for 48 h was the primary outcome measure. Maternal and neonatal outcomes were also assessed. Results: Nicorandil was comparable to nifedipine for prolongation of pregnancy for 48 h, 7 days and up to 37 weeks of gestation (p > 0.05). Women treated with nicorandil were significantly more likely to experience nausea and vomiting, maternal tachycardia and fetal tachycardia (60%, 55% and 30% of cases, respectively) compared with women treated with nifedipine (p < 0.001). Women treated with nifedipine were significantly more likely to experience palpitations (65%, p < 0.05) and headaches (70%, p < 0.001) than women treated with nicorandil. No differences in neonatal outcome were observed between the two groups (p > 0.05). Conclusions: Nicorandil is as effective as nifedipine for tocolysis in preterm labour, but is more likely to cause maternal and fetal tachycardia which may be of concern. Larger studies are needed to assess the safety of nicorandil as a novel oral tocolytic agent. (C) 2015 Elsevier Ireland Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:27 / 30
页数:4
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] RETRACTED: The role of eosinophils in immunotherapy (Retracted article. See vol. 20, pg. 329, 2020)
    Cafone, Joseph
    Ruffner, Melanie A.
    Spergel, Jonathan M.
    CURRENT OPINION IN ALLERGY AND CLINICAL IMMUNOLOGY, 2020, 20 (02) : 194 - 201
  • [42] RETRACTED: Use of albumin: an update (Retracted article. See vol. 125, pg. 417, 2020)
    Boldt, J.
    BRITISH JOURNAL OF ANAESTHESIA, 2010, 104 (03) : 276 - 284
  • [43] RETRACTED: Around the void: on the trivial (Retracted article. See vol. 42, pg. 359, 2015)
    Barnett, R. -L. Etienne
    NEOHELICON, 2013, 40 (01) : 99 - 114
  • [44] RETRACTED: Management of invasive melanoma (Retracted article. See vol. 48, pg. 743, 2019)
    Dixon, Anthony J.
    Steinman, Howard K.
    Nirenberg, Alexander
    Dixon, Zoe L.
    Anderson, Stuart
    Dixon, John B.
    AUSTRALIAN JOURNAL OF GENERAL PRACTICE, 2019, 48 (06) : 368 - 372
  • [46] RETRACTED: Pulsus paradoxus; historical and clinical perspectives (Retracted article. See vol. 150, pg. 121, 2011)
    Abu-Hilal, Mohannad A.
    Mookadam, Farouk
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF CARDIOLOGY, 2010, 138 (03) : 229 - 232
  • [47] RETRACTED: 'The Desert and the Dream': Film in Wales since 2000 (Retracted article. See vol. 19, pg. 293, 2022)
    Woodward, Kate
    JOURNAL OF BRITISH CINEMA AND TELEVISION, 2012, 9 (03) : 419 - 435
  • [48] RETRACTED: Pediatric sarcomas (Review)(Retracted article. See vol. 15, pg. 5391, 2018)
    Cao, Junhua
    An, Qi
    Wang, Lei
    ONCOLOGY LETTERS, 2018, 15 (02) : 1397 - 1402
  • [49] RETRACTED: A Societal Sleep Prescription (Retracted article. See vol. 107, pg. 394, 2020)
    Walker, Matthew P.
    NEURON, 2019, 103 (04) : 559 - 562
  • [50] RETRACTED: The myth of plant transformation (Retracted article. See vol. 37, pg. 827, 2019)
    Rao, Abdul Qayyum
    Bakhsh, Allah
    Kiani, Sarfraz
    Shahzad, Kamran
    Shahid, Ahmad Ali
    Husnain, Tayyab
    Riazuddin, S.
    BIOTECHNOLOGY ADVANCES, 2009, 27 (06) : 753 - 763