Randomized crossover sham-controlled clinical trial of targeted low-frequency transcranial magnetic stimulation comparing a figure-8 and a round coil to treat refractory neocortical epilepsy

被引:31
|
作者
Seynaeve, Laura [1 ]
Devroye, Annemie [1 ]
Dupont, Patrick [1 ,2 ]
Van Paesschen, Wim [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Hosp & KU Leuven, Lab Epilepsy Res, Dept Neurol, Leuven, Belgium
[2] Katholieke Univ Leuven, Lab Cognit Neurol, Leuven, Belgium
关键词
Experimental treatment; Coil type for magnetic stimulation; Seizure exacerbation; QUALITY-OF-LIFE; RTMS; TMS; EEG;
D O I
10.1111/epi.13247
中图分类号
R74 [神经病学与精神病学];
学科分类号
摘要
Objective: Determine the efficacy and side effects of low-frequency repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) to treat refractory neocortical epilepsy and study differences in effect between a figure-8 and round coil type. Methods: This single-center randomized sham-controlled crossover trial (NCT01745952 on ClinicalTrials.gov) included 11 patients with well-defined focal epilepsy. rTMS (0.5 Hz) was targeted to the focus during three treatment conditions consisting of 1,500 stimulations/day for 10 weekdays at 90% of resting motor threshold (rMT) followed by a 10-week observation period. Patients were randomized for the order in which the figure-8, round, and sham coil were used. Outcome assessors and patients were blinded to the type of coil used. The primary outcome measure was the percentage of seizure reduction after active rTMS treatment. Other outcome measures were responder rate, quality of life, and side effects. Results: There was no difference between a figure-8 and round coil. None of the patients achieved an overall 50% seizure reduction. One patient responded during 1 month after treatment with either active coil, followed by a significant increase in seizure frequency. Another patient had a fourfold increase in seizure frequency during rTMS treatment. Significance: This study provides evidence that rTMS is on average not effective for reducing seizure frequency. No difference in effectiveness between the different coil types was observed. It can, however, exacerbate seizures during treatment and lead to a rebound in seizure frequency after an initial reduction.
引用
收藏
页码:141 / 150
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Low-frequency, Repetitive Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation for the Treatment of Patients with Posttraumatic Stress Disorder: a Double-blind, Sham-controlled Study
    Nam, Dong-Hyun
    Pae, Chi-Un
    Chae, Jeong-Ho
    CLINICAL PSYCHOPHARMACOLOGY AND NEUROSCIENCE, 2013, 11 (02) : 96 - 102
  • [22] Cerebellar repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) for essential tremor: A double-blind, sham-controlled, crossover, add-on clinical trial
    Olfati, Nahid
    Shoeibi, Ali
    Abdollahian, Ebrahim
    Ahmadi, Hamideh
    Hoseini, Alireza
    Akhlaghi, Saeed
    Vakili, Vida
    Foroughipour, Mohsen
    Rezaeitalab, Fariborz
    Farzadfard, Mohammad-Taghi
    Layegh, Parvaneh
    Naseri, Shahrokh
    BRAIN STIMULATION, 2020, 13 (01) : 190 - 196
  • [23] Theta-Patterned, Frequency-Modulated Priming Stimulation Enhances Low-Frequency, Right Prefrontal Cortex Repetitive Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation (rTMS) in Depression: A Randomized, Sham-Controlled Study
    Nongpiur, Arvind
    Sinha, Vinod K.
    Praharaj, Samir Kumar
    Goyal, Nishant
    JOURNAL OF NEUROPSYCHIATRY AND CLINICAL NEUROSCIENCES, 2011, 23 (03) : 348 - 357
  • [24] The effect of low-frequency repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation on left dorsolateral prefrontal cortex in patients with the obsessive-compulsive disorder: a double-blinded, sham-controlled clinical trial
    Adeleh Askari Diarjani
    Seyed Alireza Haji Seyed Javadi
    Middle East Current Psychiatry, 29
  • [25] The effect of low-frequency repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation on left dorsolateral prefrontal cortex in patients with the obsessive-compulsive disorder: a double-blinded, sham-controlled clinical trial
    Diarjani, Adeleh Askari
    Javadi, Seyed Alireza Haji Seyed
    MIDDLE EAST CURRENT PSYCHIATRY-MECPSYCH, 2022, 29 (01):
  • [26] Daily repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation of primary motor cortex for neuropathic pain: A randomized, multicenter, double-blind, crossover, sham-controlled trial
    Hosomi, Koichi
    Shimokawa, Toshio
    Ikoma, Katsunori
    Nakamura, Yusaku
    Sugiyama, Kenji
    Ugawa, Yoshikazu
    Uozumi, Takenori
    Yamamoto, Takamitsu
    Saitoh, Youichi
    PAIN, 2013, 154 (07) : 1065 - 1072
  • [27] H-coil repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation does not improve executive function in patients with chronic peripheral neuropathic pain: a randomized sham-controlled crossover study
    Farnes, Nadine
    Jacobsen, Henrik B.
    Stubhaug, Audun
    Vambheim, Sara M.
    FRONTIERS IN PSYCHIATRY, 2024, 15
  • [28] Effect of Acupuncture Cooperated with Low-frequency Repetitive Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation on Chronic Insomnia: A Randomized Clinical Trial
    Zhang, Yang-pu
    Liao, Wei-jing
    Xia, Wen-guang
    CURRENT MEDICAL SCIENCE, 2018, 38 (03) : 491 - 498
  • [29] Effect of Acupuncture Cooperated with Low-frequency Repetitive Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation on Chronic Insomnia: A Randomized Clinical Trial
    Yang-pu Zhang
    Wei-jing Liao
    Wen-guang Xia
    Current Medical Science, 2018, 38 : 491 - 498
  • [30] Effect of Low-Frequency Repetitive Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation on Naming Abilities in Early-Stroke Aphasic Patients: A Prospective, Randomized, Double-Blind Sham-Controlled Study
    Waldowski, Konrad
    Seniow, Joanna
    Lesniak, Marcin
    Iwanski, Szczepan
    Czlonkowska, Anna
    SCIENTIFIC WORLD JOURNAL, 2012,