The safety and efficacy of day 1 versus day 2 administration of pegfilgrastim in patients receiving myelosuppressive chemotherapy for gynecologic malignancies

被引:28
|
作者
Whitworth, Jenny M. [1 ]
Matthews, Kellie S. [1 ]
Shipman, Kimberly A. [1 ]
Numnum, T. Michael [1 ]
Kendrick, James E. [1 ]
Kilgore, Larry C. [1 ]
Straughn, J. Michael, Jr. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Alabama, Dept Obstet & Gynecol, Div Gynecol Oncol, Birmingham, AL 35233 USA
关键词
Gynecologic malignancy; Granulocyte-colony stimulating factor; Pegfilgrastim; Safety; SAME-DAY PEGFILGRASTIM; OVARIAN-CANCER; PHASE-III; FEBRILE NEUTROPENIA; 1ST-LINE CHEMOTHERAPY; BREAST-CANCER; DAILY FILGRASTIM; DOUBLE-BLIND; STAGE-III; CARBOPLATIN;
D O I
10.1016/j.ygyno.2008.10.025
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
Objective. Pegfilgrastim is indicated to decrease the incidence of febrile neutropenia in patients with gynecologic malignancies who are receiving myelosuppressive chemotherapy. We sought to compare the safety and efficacy of day 1 pegfilgrastim administration to day 2 administration in patients with gynecologic malignancies. Methods. We retrospectively evaluated patients receiving both chemotherapy and pegfilgrastim from June 1, 2,006 to August 31, 2007 for a gynecologic malignancy. Abstracted data included patient demographics, pathology, blood Counts, toxicity, and chemotherapy, After administration of chemotherapy, all patients either received 6 ring of pegfilgrastim subcutaneously on day 1 or day 2. Results. 1226 administrations of pegfilgrastim in 230 patients were identified. 490 administrations of pegfilgrastim were given on day 1 compared to 736 on day 2. 70% of patients had ovarian cancer with a median age of 64 years (range 15-88). 79% of patients had stage III, IV, or recurrent disease and 67% were undergoing primary chemotherapy, The most common chemotherapy was docetaxel/carboplatin (53%) followed by paclitaxel/carboplatin (19%). The mean absolute neutrophil count (ANC) nadir was 4810/mm(3) in the day 1 cohort compared to 4212/mm(3) in the day 2 cohort (p=.004). The incidence of Grade 3/4 neutropenia was similar in both groups (4.9% in day 1 vs. 5.7% in day 2; p=.63). Grade 314 febrile neutropenia was uncommon in both cohorts (0 episodes vs. 3 episodes; p=.41). Treatment delays were similar in both cohorts (5.9% vs. 7.5%.; p=.35). Dose modifications were also similar in both cohorts (2.8%. vs. 5.3% p=.06). Conclusion. Day 1 administration of pegfilgrastim is as effective as day 2 administration in the prevention Of neutropenia in patients with gynecologic malignancies. Treatment delays and dose modifications were not increased after day 1 administration of pegfilgrastim. Administering pegfilgrastim on day 1 appears to be safe. effective, and convenient in selected patients receiving myelosuppressive chemotherapy for gynecologic malignancies. (C) 2008 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:601 / 604
页数:4
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Same day dosing of pegfilgrastim in patients receiving fractionated dose chemotherapy.
    Watt, LY
    Levin, R
    Musick, RE
    PHARMACOTHERAPY, 2003, 23 (03): : 406 - 407
  • [22] A single-center, observational study comparing neutropenic event rates for patients receiving pegfilgrastim on the same day or the day after chemotherapy administration
    Baribeault, DM
    Blanchard, R
    PHARMACOTHERAPY, 2004, 24 (10): : 1450 - 1450
  • [23] Incidence of febrile neutropenia in lymphoma patients receiving CHOP with Day 1 or 2 pegfilgrastim
    Woods, M. A.
    Lopez, T.
    Thomas, S. P.
    Harwood, H.
    Kettler, S. M.
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 2010, 28 (15)
  • [24] Randomized comparison of pegfilgrastim day 4 versus day 2 for the prevention of chemotherapy-induced leukocytopenia
    Zwick, C.
    Hartmann, F.
    Zeynalova, S.
    Poeschel, V.
    Nickenig, C.
    Reiser, M.
    Lengfelder, E.
    Peter, N.
    Schlimok, G.
    Schubert, J.
    Schmitz, N.
    Loeffler, M.
    Pfreundschuh, M.
    ANNALS OF ONCOLOGY, 2011, 22 (08) : 1872 - 1877
  • [25] Same day dosing of pegfilgrastim in elderly patients receiving fractionated dose chemotherapy.
    Watt, LY
    Redei, I
    Levin, RD
    Granick, J
    Neelam, R
    Musick, RE
    BLOOD, 2004, 104 (11) : 609A - 609A
  • [26] Udenyca has equivalent efficacy to the pegfilgrastim originator in breast cancer patients receiving highly myelosuppressive chemotherapy.
    Webster, Jennifer
    Scott, Jeffrey A.
    Smith, Helen
    Wieland, Danielle
    Donaldson, Joseph
    Catasus, Casey
    Smith, Robert E.
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 2020, 38 (15)
  • [27] Evaluation of the hematologic safety of same day versus standard administration of pegfilgrastim in gynecology oncology patients undergoing platinum-based chemotherapy.
    Billingsley, Caroline C.
    Jacobson, Samuel
    Crafton, Sarah
    Crim, Aleia
    Li, Quan
    Hade, Erinn
    Cohn, David E.
    Fowler, Jeffrey
    Copeland, Larry J.
    Salani, Ritu
    Backes, Floor A. Jennishens
    O'Malley, David M.
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 2014, 32 (15)
  • [28] Efficacy and Safety of Balugrastim Compared With Pegfilgrastim in Patients With Breast Cancer Receiving Chemotherapy
    Volovat, Constantin
    Gladkov, Oleg A.
    Bondarenko, Igor M.
    Barash, Steve
    Buchner, Anton
    Bias, Peter
    Adar, Liat
    Avisar, Noa
    CLINICAL BREAST CANCER, 2014, 14 (02) : 101 - 108
  • [29] Efficacy, Safety Profiles and Cost-effectiveness Analysis of Pegfilgrastim and Lenograstim in Patients with Non Metastatic Breast Cancer Receiving Adjuvant Myelosuppressive Chemotherapy
    Rossi, L.
    Lo Russo, G.
    Papa, A.
    Zoratto, F.
    Marzano, R.
    Basso, E.
    Giordani, E.
    Verrico, M.
    Pasciuti, G.
    Tomao, S.
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF CANCER, 2012, 48 : S154 - S154
  • [30] Safety and efficacy of prophylactic pegfilgrastim on day 3 of neoadjuvant DCF chemotherapy in elderly patients with resectable esophageal cancer.
    Ikeda, Go
    Yoshinami, Yuri
    Kadono, Toru
    Hirose, Toshiharu
    Ohara, Akihiro
    Itoyama, Mai
    Azuma, Ikuko
    Yamamoto, Shun
    Honma, Yoshitaka
    Ishiyama, Koshiro
    Oguma, Jyunya
    Daiko, Hiroyuki
    Kato, Ken
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 2023, 41 : 375 - 375