The safety and efficacy of day 1 versus day 2 administration of pegfilgrastim in patients receiving myelosuppressive chemotherapy for gynecologic malignancies

被引:28
|
作者
Whitworth, Jenny M. [1 ]
Matthews, Kellie S. [1 ]
Shipman, Kimberly A. [1 ]
Numnum, T. Michael [1 ]
Kendrick, James E. [1 ]
Kilgore, Larry C. [1 ]
Straughn, J. Michael, Jr. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Alabama, Dept Obstet & Gynecol, Div Gynecol Oncol, Birmingham, AL 35233 USA
关键词
Gynecologic malignancy; Granulocyte-colony stimulating factor; Pegfilgrastim; Safety; SAME-DAY PEGFILGRASTIM; OVARIAN-CANCER; PHASE-III; FEBRILE NEUTROPENIA; 1ST-LINE CHEMOTHERAPY; BREAST-CANCER; DAILY FILGRASTIM; DOUBLE-BLIND; STAGE-III; CARBOPLATIN;
D O I
10.1016/j.ygyno.2008.10.025
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
Objective. Pegfilgrastim is indicated to decrease the incidence of febrile neutropenia in patients with gynecologic malignancies who are receiving myelosuppressive chemotherapy. We sought to compare the safety and efficacy of day 1 pegfilgrastim administration to day 2 administration in patients with gynecologic malignancies. Methods. We retrospectively evaluated patients receiving both chemotherapy and pegfilgrastim from June 1, 2,006 to August 31, 2007 for a gynecologic malignancy. Abstracted data included patient demographics, pathology, blood Counts, toxicity, and chemotherapy, After administration of chemotherapy, all patients either received 6 ring of pegfilgrastim subcutaneously on day 1 or day 2. Results. 1226 administrations of pegfilgrastim in 230 patients were identified. 490 administrations of pegfilgrastim were given on day 1 compared to 736 on day 2. 70% of patients had ovarian cancer with a median age of 64 years (range 15-88). 79% of patients had stage III, IV, or recurrent disease and 67% were undergoing primary chemotherapy, The most common chemotherapy was docetaxel/carboplatin (53%) followed by paclitaxel/carboplatin (19%). The mean absolute neutrophil count (ANC) nadir was 4810/mm(3) in the day 1 cohort compared to 4212/mm(3) in the day 2 cohort (p=.004). The incidence of Grade 3/4 neutropenia was similar in both groups (4.9% in day 1 vs. 5.7% in day 2; p=.63). Grade 314 febrile neutropenia was uncommon in both cohorts (0 episodes vs. 3 episodes; p=.41). Treatment delays were similar in both cohorts (5.9% vs. 7.5%.; p=.35). Dose modifications were also similar in both cohorts (2.8%. vs. 5.3% p=.06). Conclusion. Day 1 administration of pegfilgrastim is as effective as day 2 administration in the prevention Of neutropenia in patients with gynecologic malignancies. Treatment delays and dose modifications were not increased after day 1 administration of pegfilgrastim. Administering pegfilgrastim on day 1 appears to be safe. effective, and convenient in selected patients receiving myelosuppressive chemotherapy for gynecologic malignancies. (C) 2008 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:601 / 604
页数:4
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] The safety and efficacy of day 1 versus day 2 administration of pegfilgrastim in patients receiving myelosuppressive chemotherapy for gynecologic malignancies
    Whitworth, J.
    Matthews, K. S.
    Shipman, K.
    Numnum, T. M.
    Kendrick, J. E.
    Kilgore, L. C.
    Straughn, J. M.
    [J]. GYNECOLOGIC ONCOLOGY, 2008, 108 (03) : S31 - S31
  • [2] Safety and efficacy of pegfilgrastim in patients receiving myelosuppressive chemotherapy
    Crawford, J
    [J]. PHARMACOTHERAPY, 2003, 23 (08): : 15S - 19S
  • [3] Safety and efficacy of same-day administration of pegfilgrastim in patients (pts) receiving chemotherapy for gastrointestinal (GI) malignancies.
    Matera, Robert M.
    Relias, Valerie
    Saif, Wasif M.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 2017, 35
  • [4] A Comparison of Same Day Versus Next Day Administration of Pegfilgrastim in Lymphoma Patients Receiving CHOP Chemotherapy
    Bartels, Trace
    Moore, Logan
    Alrawashdh, Neda
    Kumar, Abhijeet
    Abraham, Ivo
    Persky, Daniel O.
    McBride, Ali
    [J]. BLOOD, 2020, 136
  • [5] Safety and efficacy of pegfilgrastim administration on the same day as myelosuppressive chemotherapy (CT) in women with ovarian or primary peritoneal cancer
    Schuman, S. I.
    Lambrou, N.
    Robson, K.
    Gluck, S.
    Myriounis, N.
    Pearson, J.
    Alvarez, E.
    Crisp, M. P.
    Twiggs, L. B.
    Lucci, J. A.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 2007, 25 (18)
  • [6] Safety and efficacy of pegfilgrastim in children with cancer receiving myelosuppressive chemotherapy
    Andre, Nicolas
    El Kababri, Maria
    Bertrand, Pourroy
    Rome, Angelique
    Coze, Carole
    Gentet, Jean Claude
    Bernard, Jean Louis
    [J]. ANTI-CANCER DRUGS, 2007, 18 (03) : 277 - 281
  • [7] An institutional evaluation of the safety and efficacy of same-day administration of pegfilgrastim in patients receiving chemotherapy for lung cancer.
    Vraney, Jamie
    AlRawashdh, Neda
    Choi, Briana
    Abraham, Ivo
    McBride, Ali
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 2021, 39 (15)
  • [8] Same-Day Administration of Pegfilgrastim Following Myelosuppressive Chemotherapy: Practices and Rationale
    Darden, Christina
    Price, Mark A.
    Kaye, James A.
    Sherif, Bintu
    Marion, Sarah
    Tzivelekis, Spiros
    Garcia, Jacob
    Chandler, David
    [J]. BLOOD, 2015, 126 (23)
  • [9] "Same-Day" administration of pegfilgrastim following myelosuppressive chemotherapy: clinical practice and provider rationale
    Marion, Sarah
    Tzivelekis, Spiros
    Darden, Christina
    Price, Mark A.
    Sherif, Bintu
    Garcia, Jacob
    Kaye, James A.
    Chandler, David
    [J]. SUPPORTIVE CARE IN CANCER, 2016, 24 (09) : 3889 - 3896
  • [10] “Same-Day” administration of pegfilgrastim following myelosuppressive chemotherapy: clinical practice and provider rationale
    Sarah Marion
    Spiros Tzivelekis
    Christina Darden
    Mark A. Price
    Bintu Sherif
    Jacob Garcia
    James A. Kaye
    David Chandler
    [J]. Supportive Care in Cancer, 2016, 24 : 3889 - 3896