Calculation of protein-ligand binding affinities based on a fragment quantum mechanical method

被引:20
|
作者
Liu, Jinfeng [1 ]
Wang, Xianwei [2 ]
Zhang, John Z. H. [1 ,3 ,4 ]
He, Xiao [1 ,3 ]
机构
[1] E China Normal Univ, Coll Chem & Mol Engn, Inst Theoret & Computat Sci, State Key Lab Precis Spect, Shanghai 200062, Peoples R China
[2] Zhejiang Univ Technol, Coll Sci, Ctr Opt & Optoelect Res, Hangzhou 310023, Zhejiang, Peoples R China
[3] NYU Shanghai, NYU ECNU Ctr Computat Chem, Shanghai 200062, Peoples R China
[4] NYU, Dept Chem, New York, NY 10003 USA
基金
中国国家自然科学基金;
关键词
FREE-ENERGY CALCULATIONS; ABSOLUTE FREE-ENERGY; MOLECULAR-MECHANICS; ELECTRON-DENSITY; CONJUGATE CAPS; FORCE-FIELD; SOLVATION; DYNAMICS; BIOTIN; AVIDIN;
D O I
10.1039/c5ra20185c
中图分类号
O6 [化学];
学科分类号
0703 ;
摘要
An electrostatically embedded generalized molecular fractionation with conjugate caps (EE-GMFCC) method (J. Phys. Chem. A, 2013, 117, 7149) has been successfully used for efficient linear-scaling quantum mechanical (QM) calculations of protein energies. Furthermore, an efficient approach that combined the EE-GMFCC method with a conductor-like polarizable continuum model (CPCM), termed as EE-GMFCC-CPCM (J. Chem. Phys., 2013, 139, 214104), was developed for ab initio calculations of the electrostatic solvation energy of proteins. In this study, we applied the EE-GMFCC-CPCM method for the calculation of binding affinities of 14 avidin-biotin analogues. The calculation delineated the contributions of interaction energy and electrostatic solvation energy to the binding affinity. The binding affinity of each ligand bound to avidin was calculated at the HF/6-31G* and B3LYP/6-31G* levels with empirical dispersion corrections, respectively. The correlation coefficient (R) between the calculated binding energies and experimental values is 0.75 at the HF/6-31G*-D level based on single complex structure calculations, as compared to 0.73 of the force field result. On the other hand, the correlation coefficient between the calculated binding energies and the experimental values is 0.85 at the B3LYP/631G*- D level based on single complex structure calculations, and this correlation can be further improved to 0.88 when multiple snapshots are considered. Our study demonstrates that the EE-GMFCC-CPCM method is capable of providing reliable predictions of binding affinities for various ligands bound to the same target.
引用
收藏
页码:107020 / 107030
页数:11
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] VSGB 2.0 continuum dielectric model: Application to protein structure prediction and refinement and calculation of protein-ligand binding affinities
    Friesner, Richard A.
    ABSTRACTS OF PAPERS OF THE AMERICAN CHEMICAL SOCIETY, 2012, 244
  • [32] RECENT THEORETICAL AND COMPUTATIONAL ADVANCES FOR MODELING PROTEIN-LIGAND BINDING AFFINITIES
    Gallicchio, Emilio
    Levy, Ronald M.
    ADVANCES IN PROTEIN CHEMISTRY AND STRUCTURAL BIOLOGY, VOL 85: COMPUTATIONAL CHEMISTRY METHODS IN STRUCTURAL BIOLOGY, 2011, 85 : 27 - 80
  • [33] Calculating protein-ligand binding affinities with MM/PBSA: Improvement and extension
    Qi, Ruxi
    Wang, Changhao
    Xiao, Li
    Botello-Smith, Wesley
    Greene, D'Artagnan
    Luo, Ray
    ABSTRACTS OF PAPERS OF THE AMERICAN CHEMICAL SOCIETY, 2017, 254
  • [34] Estimating protein-ligand binding affinities using a fluctuating charge model
    Stern, Harry A.
    ABSTRACTS OF PAPERS OF THE AMERICAN CHEMICAL SOCIETY, 2010, 240
  • [35] Prediction of protein-ligand binding affinities using multiple instance learning
    Teramoto, Reiji
    Kashima, Hisashi
    JOURNAL OF MOLECULAR GRAPHICS & MODELLING, 2010, 29 (03): : 492 - 497
  • [36] Development of an empirical scoring function for calculating protein-ligand binding affinities
    Friesner, Richard A.
    ABSTRACTS OF PAPERS OF THE AMERICAN CHEMICAL SOCIETY, 2012, 243
  • [37] An all atom energy based computational protocol for predicting binding affinities of protein-ligand complexes
    Jain, T
    Jayaram, B
    FEBS LETTERS, 2005, 579 (29) : 6659 - 6666
  • [38] Quick-and-Easy Validation of Protein-Ligand Binding Models Using Fragment-Based Semiempirical Quantum Chemistry
    Bowling, Paige E.
    Broderick, Dustin R.
    Herbert, John M.
    JOURNAL OF CHEMICAL INFORMATION AND MODELING, 2025,
  • [39] Assessment and Acceleration of Binding Energy Calculations for Protein-Ligand Complexes by the Fragment Molecular Orbital Method
    Otsuka, Takao
    Okimoto, Noriaki
    Taiji, Makoto
    JOURNAL OF COMPUTATIONAL CHEMISTRY, 2015, 36 (30) : 2209 - 2218
  • [40] Subsystem Analysis for the Fragment Molecular Orbital Method and Its Application to Protein-Ligand Binding in Solution
    Fedorov, Dmitri G.
    Kitaura, Kazuo
    JOURNAL OF PHYSICAL CHEMISTRY A, 2016, 120 (14): : 2218 - 2231