On the Mixed H2/H∞ Loop-Shaping Tradeoffs in Fractional-Order Control of the AVR System

被引:55
|
作者
Das, Saptarshi [1 ]
Pan, Indranil [2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Southampton, Sch Elect & Comp Sci, Commun Signal Proc & Control CSPC Grp, Southampton SO17 1BJ, Hants, England
[2] Univ London Imperial Coll Sci Technol & Med, Dept Earth Sci & Engn, Energy Environm Modelling & Minerals Res Sect E2M, London SW7 2AZ, England
关键词
Automatic voltage regulator (AVR); fractional-order (FO) proportional-integral differential (PID) controller; frequency domain design tradeoffs; multiobjective optimization (MOO); (PID-MU)-D-LAMBDA CONTROLLER; PID CONTROLLERS; DESIGN;
D O I
10.1109/TII.2014.2322812
中图分类号
TP [自动化技术、计算机技术];
学科分类号
0812 ;
摘要
This paper looks at frequency domain design of a fractional-order (FO) proportional-integral differential (PID) controller for an automatic voltage regulator (AVR) system. Various performance criteria of the AVR system are formulated as system norms and are then coupled with an evolutionary multiobjective optimization (MOO) algorithm to yield Pareto optimal design tradeoffs. The performance measures consist of mixed H-2/H-infinity design objectives, such as the set-point tracking, load disturbance, and noise rejection controller effort, which are an exhaustive set of conflicting control objectives. A fuzzy logic-based mechanism is used to identify the best compromise solution on the Pareto fronts. The advantages and disadvantages of using an FOPID controller over the conventional PID controller, which are popular for industrial use, are enunciated from the presented simulations. The relevance and impact of FO controller design from the perspective of the dynamics of AVR control loop is also discussed.
引用
收藏
页码:1982 / 1991
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Two applications for hybrid H∞-control:: Generalised sampled-data and loop-shaping
    Christiansson, AK
    Lennartson, B
    Toivonen, HT
    PERIODIC CONTROL SYSTEMS 2001, 2002, : 101 - 106
  • [32] H2, H∞, and mixed H2/H∞ congestion control of ATM networks
    Nazeeruddin, M
    Toker, O
    PROCEEDINGS OF 1999 SYMPOSIUM ON PERFORMANCE EVALUATION OF COMPUTER AND TELECOMMUNICATION SYSTEMS, 1999, : 22 - 25
  • [33] Robust high-gain loop-shaping H-infinity control of servomechanisms
    Choi, C
    Kim, JS
    KSME INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL, 1997, 11 (01): : 45 - 55
  • [34] Control of combustion oscillations H∞ via loop-shaping, μ-analysis and Integral Quadratic Constraints
    Chu, YC
    Glover, K
    Dowling, AP
    AUTOMATICA, 2003, 39 (02) : 219 - 231
  • [35] LMI approach to normalised H∞ loop-shaping design of power system damping controllers
    Majumder, R
    Chaudhuri, B
    El-Zobaidi, H
    Pal, BC
    Jaimoukha, IM
    IEE PROCEEDINGS-GENERATION TRANSMISSION AND DISTRIBUTION, 2005, 152 (06) : 952 - 960
  • [36] DESIGN OF MULTIOBJECTIVE H infinity LOOP-SHAPING SISO CONTROL SYSTEMS BY FUZZY LOGIC
    Selekwa, M. F.
    Collins, E. G., Jr.
    CONTROL AND INTELLIGENT SYSTEMS, 2006, 34 (01)
  • [37] Characteristics Evaluation of a H∞ Loop-Shaping Controller for a Single-Phase PV System
    Chowdhury, M. A.
    Mahmud, M. A.
    2014 IEEE PES ASIA-PACIFIC POWER AND ENERGY ENGINEERING CONFERENCE (IEEE PES APPEEC), 2014,
  • [38] Maximum Power Generation Control of a Hybrid Wind Turbine Transmission System Based on H∞ Loop-Shaping Approach
    Yin, Xiuxing
    Tong, Xin
    Zhao, Xiaowei
    Karcanias, Aris
    IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON SUSTAINABLE ENERGY, 2020, 11 (02) : 561 - 570
  • [39] Attitude control system design for unmanned aerial vehicles using H-Infinity and loop-shaping methods
    Gadewadikar, J.
    Lewis, F.
    Subbarao, K.
    Chen, B. M.
    2007 IEEE INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON CONTROL AND AUTOMATION, VOLS 1-7, 2007, : 1756 - +
  • [40] Robust flight control system design using H∞ loop-shaping and recessive trait crossover genetic algorithm
    El-Mahallawy, A. A.
    Yousef, H. A.
    El-Singaby, M. I.
    Madkour, A. A.
    Youssef, A. M.
    EXPERT SYSTEMS WITH APPLICATIONS, 2011, 38 (01) : 169 - 174