Financial performance evaluation by multi-criteria decision-making techniques

被引:5
|
作者
Turegun, Nida [1 ]
机构
[1] Ozyegin Univ, Sch Appl Sci, Istanbul, Turkey
关键词
BIST; Tourism sector; Financial performance; Entropy; TOPSIS; VIKOR; VIKOR METHOD; FUZZY AHP; TOPSIS; INTERVAL; TOURISM; EFFICIENCY; WEIGHTS;
D O I
10.1016/j.heliyon.2022.e09361
中图分类号
O [数理科学和化学]; P [天文学、地球科学]; Q [生物科学]; N [自然科学总论];
学科分类号
07 ; 0710 ; 09 ;
摘要
A thorough review of techniques for the experts invested in capital markets is necessary to take the decision making process on the stock. When it comes to profiting from the capital markets, timing is crucial. The accurate evaluation of the financial performance of the businesses in the tourism sector is of great importance both in socio-economic and strategic terms in all countries in the world. As a result, the majority of investors use multi criteria decision-making techniques to choose the best stocks. Thus, this paper aims to perform analysis on the TOPSIS, and VIKOR multi-criteria decision-making methods by taking base as an entropy method across companies that operate in the tourism industry and are publicly traded on the Borsa Istanbul by covering the data from 2018 to 2020, and to uncover the performance results of the companies and rank them by these main criteria. In the analysis results regarding the evaluation of the financial performance of tourism companies traded in BIST, it was seen that the ranking results made with TOPSIS and VIKOR methods were similar in 2018 and 2019. It is slightly different in 2020. It was seen that AVTUR was the most important alternative in both methods, whereas MARTI had the lowest ranking alternative. Moreover, MERIT, KSTUR, and PKENT have been determined as fluctuating companies.
引用
收藏
页数:13
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] CONSIDERING INTERACTIONS IN MULTI-CRITERIA DECISION-MAKING
    Cancer, Vesna
    [J]. PROCEEDINGS OF THE 10TH INTERNATIONAL SYMPOSIUM ON OPERATIONAL RESEARCH SOR 09, 2009, : 151 - 156
  • [32] Multi-Criteria Decision-Making with Linguistic Labels
    Mieszkowicz-Rolka, Alicja
    Rolka, Leszek
    [J]. PROCEEDINGS OF THE 2022 17TH CONFERENCE ON COMPUTER SCIENCE AND INTELLIGENCE SYSTEMS (FEDCSIS), 2022, : 263 - 267
  • [33] Multi-criteria Decision-making in Urban Planning
    Kilnarova, Pavla
    [J]. 6TH ANNUAL CONFERENCE ON ARCHITECTURE AND URBANISM, 2017, : 94 - 100
  • [34] When is a Decision-Making Method Trustworthy? Criteria for Evaluating Multi-Criteria Decision-Making Methods
    Saaty, Thomas L.
    Ergu, Daji
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY & DECISION MAKING, 2015, 14 (06) : 1171 - 1187
  • [35] Manufacturing Industry Performance Appraisals: Multi-Criteria Decision-Making Model
    Andriani, Debrina Puspita
    Wijayanti, Febry
    Rahmani, Ilma Visi
    Aini, Azizah Putri Nur
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF INTEGRATED ENGINEERING, 2022, 14 (06): : 28 - 37
  • [36] An interactive multi-criteria decision-making method for building performance design
    Han, Zhen
    Li, Xiaoqian
    Sun, Jiaqi
    Wang, Mo
    Liu, Gang
    [J]. ENERGY AND BUILDINGS, 2023, 282
  • [37] A fuzzy multi-criteria decision-making technique for evaluation of scheduling rules
    Chan, FTS
    Chan, HK
    Kazerooni, A
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ADVANCED MANUFACTURING TECHNOLOGY, 2002, 20 (02): : 103 - 113
  • [38] A hybrid multi-criteria decision-making model for firms competence evaluation
    Amiri, M.
    Zandieh, M.
    Soltani, R.
    Vahdani, B.
    [J]. EXPERT SYSTEMS WITH APPLICATIONS, 2009, 36 (10) : 12314 - 12322
  • [39] Evaluation of three multi-criteria decision-making methods in Ecosystem Management
    Pavlikakis, Georgios E.
    Tsihrintzis, Vassillos A.
    [J]. Proceedings of the 8th International Conference on Environmental Science and Technology, Vol B, Poster Presentations, 2003, : 667 - 674
  • [40] Evaluation of the Difficulties in the Internet of Things (IoT) with Multi-Criteria Decision-Making
    Uslu, Buse
    Eren, Tamer
    Gur, Seyda
    Ozcan, Evrencan
    [J]. PROCESSES, 2019, 7 (03):