Motivated by donor interest in innovative thinking on food security, we conducted an interdisciplinary, triangulation analysis of four divergent conceptual frameworks, each relevant to diagnosing food insecurity in developing countries. We found notable tensions as well as synergistic interactions between agroecology, agricultural innovation systems, social ecological systems, and political ecology. Cross-framework interactions enhance our understanding of how sectoral and macro-economic development strategies impact on livelihoods, availability, and access. Re-invigorated, more profound dialog between divergent conceptual frameworks enables diagnosis of complex food insecurity problems, and context-specific interventions and innovations. Informed use of divergent approaches constitutes a new ambition for research and practice. (C) 2014 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Ltd. This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0/).
机构:
Rutgers Robert Wood Johnson Med Sch, Dept Surg, New Brunswick, NJ 08903 USARutgers Robert Wood Johnson Med Sch, Dept Surg, New Brunswick, NJ 08903 USA
Bolton, Laura
WOUNDS-A COMPENDIUM OF CLINICAL RESEARCH AND PRACTICE,
2018,
30
(01):
: 27
-
28