Potential of gene drives with genome editing to increase genetic gain in livestock breeding programs

被引:2
|
作者
Gonen, Serap [1 ,2 ]
Jenko, Janez [1 ,2 ]
Gorjanc, Gregor [1 ,2 ]
Mileham, Alan J. [3 ]
Whitelaw, C. Bruce A. [1 ,2 ]
Hickey, John M. [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Edinburgh, Roslin Inst, Easter Bush, Midlothian, Scotland
[2] Univ Edinburgh, Royal Dick Sch Vet Studies, Easter Bush, Midlothian, Scotland
[3] Genus Plc, 1525 River Rd, De Forest, WI 53532 USA
基金
英国生物技术与生命科学研究理事会; 英国医学研究理事会;
关键词
MUTAGENIC CHAIN-REACTION; NATURAL-POPULATIONS; ALLELES; PROMOTION; SEQUENCE; PIGS;
D O I
10.1186/s12711-016-0280-3
中图分类号
S8 [畜牧、 动物医学、狩猎、蚕、蜂];
学科分类号
0905 ;
摘要
Background: This paper uses simulation to explore how gene drives can increase genetic gain in livestock breeding programs. Gene drives are naturally occurring phenomena that cause a mutation on one chromosome to copy itself onto its homologous chromosome. Methods: We simulated nine different breeding and editing scenarios with a common overall structure. Each scenario began with 21 generations of selection, followed by 20 generations of selection based on true breeding values where the breeder used selection alone, selection in combination with genome editing, or selection with genome editing and gene drives. In the scenarios that used gene drives, we varied the probability of successfully incorporating the gene drive. For each scenario, we evaluated genetic gain, genetic variance (sigma(2)(A)), rate of change in inbreeding (Delta F), number of distinct quantitative trait nucleotides (QTN) edited, rate of increase in favourable allele frequencies of edited QTN and the time to fix favourable alleles. Results: Gene drives enhanced the benefits of genome editing in seven ways: (1) they amplified the increase in genetic gain brought about by genome editing; (2) they amplified the rate of increase in the frequency of favourable alleles and reduced the time it took to fix them; (3) they enabled more rapid targeting of QTN with lesser effect for genome editing; (4) they distributed fixed editing resources across a larger number of distinct QTN across generations; (5) they focussed editing on a smaller number of QTN within a given generation; (6) they reduced the level of inbreeding when editing a subset of the sires; and (7) they increased the efficiency of converting genetic variation into genetic gain. Conclusions: Genome editing in livestock breeding results in short-, medium- and long-term increases in genetic gain. The increase in genetic gain occurs because editing increases the frequency of favourable alleles in the population. Gene drives accelerate the increase in allele frequency caused by editing, which results in even higher genetic gain over a shorter period of time with no impact on inbreeding.
引用
收藏
页数:14
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Risk and safety considerations 2: genetic variations and potential risks-traditional breeding and genome editing
    Tabei, Yutaka
    TRANSGENIC RESEARCH, 2019, 28 (Suppl 2) : 119 - 124
  • [32] Genome Editing 2020: Ethics and Human Rights in Germline Editing in Humans and Gene Drives in Mosquitoes
    Annas, George J.
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF LAW & MEDICINE, 2020, 46 (2-3) : 143 - 165
  • [33] Genome-editing technologies and their potential application in horticultural crop breeding
    Xiong, Jin-Song
    Ding, Jing
    Li, Yi
    HORTICULTURE RESEARCH, 2015, 2
  • [34] Effects of genotype x environment interaction on genetic gain in breeding programs
    Mulder, HA
    Bijma, P
    JOURNAL OF ANIMAL SCIENCE, 2005, 83 (01) : 49 - 61
  • [35] Development of whole-genome prediction models to increase the rate of genetic gain in intermediate wheatgrass (Thinopyrum intermedium) breeding
    Crain, Jared
    Haghighattalab, Atena
    DeHaan, Lee
    Poland, Jesse
    PLANT GENOME, 2021, 14 (02):
  • [36] Simulation of dual-purpose chicken breeding programs implementing gene editing
    Edward Y. S. Chuang
    Robin Wellmann
    Franck L. B. Meijboom
    Jens Tetens
    Jörn Bennewitz
    Genetics Selection Evolution, 56
  • [37] Simulation of dual-purpose chicken breeding programs implementing gene editing
    Chuang, Edward Y. S.
    Wellmann, Robin
    Meijboom, Franck L. B.
    Tetens, Jens
    Bennewitz, Joern
    GENETICS SELECTION EVOLUTION, 2024, 56 (01)
  • [38] From Genetic Stock to Genome Editing: Gene Exploitation in Wheat
    Wang, Meng
    Wang, Shubin
    Liang, Zhen
    Shi, Weiming
    Gao, Caixia
    Xia, Guangmin
    TRENDS IN BIOTECHNOLOGY, 2018, 36 (02) : 160 - 172
  • [39] Harnessing the potential of mutation breeding, CRISPR genome editing, and beyond for sustainable agriculture
    A'azizam, Nelissa Maisara Nor
    Chopra, Sakshi
    Guleria, Praveen
    Kumar, Vineet
    Abd Rahim, Muhamad Hafiz
    Yaacob, Jamilah Syafawati
    FUNCTIONAL & INTEGRATIVE GENOMICS, 2024, 24 (02)
  • [40] Harnessing the potential of mutation breeding, CRISPR genome editing, and beyond for sustainable agriculture
    Nelissa Maisara Nor A’azizam
    Sakshi Chopra
    Praveen Guleria
    Vineet Kumar
    Muhamad Hafiz Abd Rahim
    Jamilah Syafawati Yaacob
    Functional & Integrative Genomics, 2024, 24