Eye Movement Perimetry and Frequency Doubling Perimetry: clinical performance and patient preference during glaucoma screening

被引:6
|
作者
Meethal, Najiya Sundus Kadavath [1 ,2 ]
Pel, Johan J. M. [1 ]
Mazumdar, Deepmala [1 ,2 ]
Asokan, Rashima [2 ]
Panday, Manish [2 ]
van der Steen, Johannes [1 ,3 ]
George, Ronnie [2 ]
机构
[1] Erasmus MC, Dept Neurosci, Vestibular & Ocular Motor Res Grp, NL-3000 CA Rotterdam, Netherlands
[2] Med & Vis Res Fdn, Chennai, Tamil Nadu, India
[3] Royal Dutch Visio, Huizen, Netherlands
关键词
Glaucoma screening; Visual field defects; Perimetry; Eye movement perimetry; Saccadic reaction time; Frequency doubling perimetry; Robin's score; Patient preference; VISUAL-FIELD; CLASSIFICATION; PREVALENCE; BURDEN;
D O I
10.1007/s00417-019-04311-4
中图分类号
R77 [眼科学];
学科分类号
100212 ;
摘要
PurposeTo evaluate the screening accuracy of an Eye Movement Perimetry (EMP) in comparison with Frequency Doubling Perimetry (FDP) and to investigate the patient preference and perception towards these visual field screening methods.MethodsA total of 104 healthy subjects (mean age (SD) of 48 (14) years) and 73 glaucoma patients (mean age (SD) of 52 (13) years) were recruited. All the participants underwent a comprehensive ophthalmic evaluation including the 24-2 SITA standard protocol on the Humphrey Field Analyzer (HFA). This was followed by the 26-point protocol in EMP and the C-20-1 protocol in FDP. During EMP, all subjects were instructed to fixate a central target and to look at the detected peripheral target, followed by refixation of the central target and Saccadic Reaction Time (SRT) towards each of the seen stimuli was calculated. Next, a questionnaire was administered to evaluate the patient preference and perception towards the perimetry techniques. Mean SRTs and Robin scores were used to plot Receiver Operating Characteristics (ROC) curves to determine the screening accuracies. From the questionnaire survey, the frequency distributions of the responses were calculated.ResultsRobin score and SRT were significantly increased in glaucoma patients in comparison with the age-matched healthy subjects (p<0.001). The ROC analysis revealed comparable Area Under the Curve (AUC) values (0.95, p=0.81) with a specificity of 95.2% for FDP and 96.2% for EMP with a sensitivity of 87.7%. Thirty-seven percent of the older age group (40years) and 65% of severe glaucoma patients showed preference for EMP over FDP.ConclusionsThis study results indicate that the customized protocol in EMP provides efficient and rapid means of screening visual field defects in glaucoma, which compared well with FDP. Elderly healthy participants and patients with moderate and severe glaucomatous defectspreferred EMP as it permitted natural reflexive eye movements thereby resembling a real-life test setting.
引用
收藏
页码:1277 / 1287
页数:11
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Eye Movement Perimetry and Frequency Doubling Perimetry: clinical performance and patient preference during glaucoma screening
    Najiya Sundus Kadavath Meethal
    Johan J. M. Pel
    Deepmala Mazumdar
    Rashima Asokan
    Manish Panday
    Johannes van der Steen
    Ronnie George
    Graefe's Archive for Clinical and Experimental Ophthalmology, 2019, 257 : 1277 - 1287
  • [2] Performance of frequency doubling perimetry in screening for glaucoma
    Weih, L
    Sakellariou, A
    Rait, J
    McCarty, C
    Taylor, H
    INVESTIGATIVE OPHTHALMOLOGY & VISUAL SCIENCE, 2000, 41 (04) : S477 - S477
  • [3] Frequency doubling perimetry in glaucoma
    Thomas, R
    Bhat, S
    Muliyil, JP
    Parikh, R
    George, R
    JOURNAL OF GLAUCOMA, 2002, 11 (01) : 46 - 50
  • [4] Screening for glaucoma in India with the frequency doubling perimetry test
    Mansberger, SL
    Johnson, CA
    Cioffi, GA
    Krishnadas, R
    Srinivasan, M
    Balamurugan, V
    Kim, U
    Smith, SD
    Wilkins, JH
    Gritz, DC
    INVESTIGATIVE OPHTHALMOLOGY & VISUAL SCIENCE, 2002, 43 : U492 - U492
  • [5] Comparison of Glaucoma Detection Performance of Binocular Perimetry Screening Program Using imo Perimetry With Frequency Doubling Technology
    Nishijima, Euido
    Hosaka, Daisuke
    Ogawa, Shumpei
    Itoh, Yoshinori
    Noro, Takahiko
    Okude, Sachiyo
    Sano, Kei
    Yoshikawa, Keiji
    Tatemichi, Masayuki
    Nakano, Tadashi
    TRANSLATIONAL VISION SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY, 2024, 13 (08):
  • [6] Screening glaucoma with frequency doubling perimetry in general population.
    Nordmann, JP
    Mouton, D
    Brion, F
    INVESTIGATIVE OPHTHALMOLOGY & VISUAL SCIENCE, 2000, 41 (04) : S87 - S87
  • [7] Eye Movement Perimetry in Glaucoma Patients
    Xu, Alice
    Warren, David
    Doyle, Carrie
    Papendieck, Andrew
    Thurtell, Matthew
    Wall, Michael
    INVESTIGATIVE OPHTHALMOLOGY & VISUAL SCIENCE, 2013, 54 (15)
  • [8] Comparison of frequency doubling perimetry to standard achromatic automated perimetry in glaucoma
    Serguhn, S
    Spiegel, D
    INVESTIGATIVE OPHTHALMOLOGY & VISUAL SCIENCE, 1999, 40 (04) : S842 - S842
  • [9] EYE-MOVEMENT PERIMETRY IN GLAUCOMA
    HOWES, F
    EIZENMAN, M
    ADAR, A
    TROPE, GE
    INVESTIGATIVE OPHTHALMOLOGY & VISUAL SCIENCE, 1992, 33 (04) : 1383 - 1383
  • [10] EYE-MOVEMENT PERIMETRY IN GLAUCOMA
    TROPE, GE
    EIZENMAN, M
    COYLE, E
    CANADIAN JOURNAL OF OPHTHALMOLOGY-JOURNAL CANADIEN D OPHTALMOLOGIE, 1989, 24 (05): : 197 - 199