Analysis of Observational Studies: A Guide to Understanding Statistical Methods

被引:28
|
作者
Morshed, Saam
Tornetta, Paul, III
Bhandari, Mohit
机构
[1] Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, University of California San Francisco, Orthopaedic Trauma Institute at San Francisco General Hospital, San Francisco, CA 94110
[2] Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Boston University Medical Center, Boston, MA 02118, 850 Harrison Avenue
[3] Division of Orthopaedic Surgery, Department of Surgery, McMaster University, Hamilton, ON L8L 2X2
关键词
PROPENSITY SCORE METHODS; INSTRUMENTAL VARIABLES; PREDICTORS; FRACTURES; MORTALITY; BIAS; HIP;
D O I
10.2106/JBJS.H.01577
中图分类号
R826.8 [整形外科学]; R782.2 [口腔颌面部整形外科学]; R726.2 [小儿整形外科学]; R62 [整形外科学(修复外科学)];
学科分类号
摘要
Observational studies provide an important source of information when randomized controlled trials cannot or should not be undertaken, provided that the data are analyzed and interpreted with special attention to bias. This article highlights the special analytic considerations required for proper reporting and interpretation of observational studies. We review statistical principles that are fundamental to understanding what observational data can offer. The concepts include the relationship between a study sample and the target population, and the two primary forms of statistical analysis: estimation and hypothesis testing. The concept of bias, and confounding in particular, is introduced as an obstacle to drawing valid conclusions from an observational study. The discussion will then focus on the techniques that are most useful in the analysis of the three most common types of observational studies (the case series, the therapeutic study, and the prognostic study). The goal of this review is to empower the reader to take a practical approach to and validly interpret the statistical analysis of these study types.
引用
收藏
页码:50 / 60
页数:11
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Statistical methods in epidemiology: A comparison of statistical methods to analyze dose-response and trend analysis in epidemiologic studies
    Boucher, KM
    Slattery, ML
    Berry, TD
    Quesenberry, C
    Anderson, K
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL EPIDEMIOLOGY, 1998, 51 (12) : 1223 - 1233
  • [32] On the statistical role of inexact matching in observational studies
    Guo, Kevin
    Rothenhausler, Dominik
    BIOMETRIKA, 2023, 110 (03) : 631 - 644
  • [33] Statistical Note: Confounding and Causality in Observational Studies
    Horvat, Christopher
    PEDIATRIC CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE, 2021, 22 (05) : 496 - 498
  • [34] Choice of statistical model in observational studies of ART
    Dodge, Laura E.
    Farland, Leslie V.
    Correia, Katharine F. B.
    Missmer, Stacey A.
    Seidler, Emily A.
    Wilkinson, Jack
    Modest, Anna M.
    Hacker, Michele R.
    HUMAN REPRODUCTION, 2020, 35 (07) : 1499 - 1504
  • [35] STATISTICAL METHODS FOR BRIDGING STUDIES
    Chow, Shein-Chung
    Chiang, Chieh
    Liu, Jen-pei
    Hsiao, Chin-Fu
    JOURNAL OF BIOPHARMACEUTICAL STATISTICS, 2012, 22 (05) : 903 - 915
  • [36] Statistical methods for carcinogenicity studies
    Morton, D
    Lee, PN
    Fry, JS
    Fairweather, WR
    Haseman, JK
    Kodell, RL
    Chen, JJ
    Roth, AJ
    Soper, K
    TOXICOLOGIC PATHOLOGY, 2002, 30 (03) : 403 - 414
  • [37] Statistical methods for medical studies
    Nam, Chung Mo
    Chung, SooYeon
    JOURNAL OF THE KOREAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION, 2012, 55 (06): : 573 - 581
  • [38] ANALYSIS OF VARIANCE METHODS FOR DESIGN AND ANALYSIS OF MONTE-CARLO STATISTICAL STUDIES
    WIKE, EL
    CHURCH, JD
    BULLETIN OF THE PSYCHONOMIC SOCIETY, 1977, 10 (02) : 131 - 133
  • [39] A guide for selecting statistical techniques for medical studies
    Acikel, Cengiz Han
    Kilic, Selim
    JOURNAL OF MOOD DISORDERS, 2014, 4 (03) : 136 - 141
  • [40] A Practical Guide to Interpret Individual Participant Data Meta-analysis of Observational Studies
    Ballew, Shoshana H.
    Mok, Yejin
    Matsushita, Kunihiro
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF KIDNEY DISEASES, 2021, 78 (03) : 464 - 467