Idea selection and adoption by users - a process model in an online innovation community

被引:22
|
作者
Wang, Nan [1 ]
Tiberius, Victor [2 ]
Chen, Xiangxiang [3 ]
Brem, Alexander [4 ,5 ]
Yu, Fei [5 ]
机构
[1] Beijing Technol & Business Univ, Sch Business, 33 Fucheng Rd, Beijing 100048, Peoples R China
[2] Univ Potsdam, Fac Econ & Social Sci, Potsdam, Germany
[3] Beijing Univ Posts & Telecommun, Sch Econ & Management, Beijing, Peoples R China
[4] Univ Stuttgart, Inst Entrepreneurship & Innovat Sci, Stuttgart, Germany
[5] Univ Southern Denmark, Dept Technol & Innovat, Sonderborg, Denmark
基金
中国国家自然科学基金; 北京市自然科学基金;
关键词
Idea adoption; idea selection; online innovation community; cognitive overload;
D O I
10.1080/09537325.2020.1863055
中图分类号
C93 [管理学];
学科分类号
12 ; 1201 ; 1202 ; 120202 ;
摘要
Firms increasingly use ideas from online innovation communities to solve problems or to better address customer needs. However, in many cases the number of submitted ideas has exploded, it leads to an information overload that firms hardly can handle considering their limited cognitive resources. Therefore, we use the Elaboration Likelihood Model to distinguish between the quick and lean idea preselection process as a peripheral route of information processing and the subsequent idea review process as a central route of information processing. In our empirical study with a sample of more than 163,000 ideas collected from the Xiaomi MIUI community, we analyse influencing factors that increase the likelihood of ideas being preselected or reviewed. Results show that user status, user initiative contribution, and community recognition have a significantly positive influence on idea preselction, whereas user response contribution has no influence. Idea presentation characteristics have an inverted U-curve relationship with idea adoption. Community absorptive capacity has a moderate effect on the curvilinear relationship between idea description length and idea adoption.
引用
收藏
页码:1036 / 1051
页数:16
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [11] A model for knowledge innovation in online learning community
    Zhan, Qinglong
    TECHNOLOGIES FOR E-LEARNING AND DIGITAL ENTERTAINMENT, PROCEEDINGS, 2008, 5093 : 21 - 31
  • [12] Online public relations: The adoption process and innovation challenge, a Greek example
    Kitchen, Philip J.
    Panopoulos, Anastasios
    PUBLIC RELATIONS REVIEW, 2010, 36 (03) : 222 - 229
  • [13] An innovation process model for technology development and adoption in construction
    Mishra, Dhanada K. (dhanadam@ust.hk), 1600, Associated Cement Companies Ltd. (94):
  • [14] Management response and user idea generation: evidence from an online open innovation community
    Han, Dongmei
    Pang, Zhiliang
    He, Lifeng
    Zhou, Xiaohang
    Zhang, Shaohua
    INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY & MANAGEMENT, 2023, 24 (04): : 381 - 400
  • [15] Management response and user idea generation: evidence from an online open innovation community
    Dongmei Han
    Zhiliang Pang
    Lifeng He
    Xiaohang Zhou
    Shaohua Zhang
    Information Technology and Management, 2023, 24 : 381 - 400
  • [16] Lead users as idea supplier in online community platform: How to choose the right ideas to implement?
    Yang, Mu
    Ooi, Yat Ming
    Han, Chunjia
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF PRODUCTION ECONOMICS, 2022, 244
  • [17] Study on users' adoption of Online Group Purchase in China: Arevised UTAUT model
    Liu, J. (liuj@zucc.edu.cn), 1600, Advanced Institute of Convergence Information Technology, Myoungbo Bldg 3F,, Bumin-dong 1-ga, Seo-gu, Busan, 602-816, Korea, Republic of (04):
  • [18] IIDMCC: An Innovation Idea Discovery Model Using Online Customers' Complaint Messages
    Kao, Shu-Chen
    JOURNAL OF INTERNET TECHNOLOGY, 2022, 23 (02): : 209 - 216
  • [19] Developing a Dynamic Model for Idea Selection during Fuzzy Front End of Innovation
    Khastehdel, Mohammad
    Mansour, Saeed
    2018 7TH INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON INDUSTRIAL TECHNOLOGY AND MANAGEMENT (ICITM 2018), 2018, : 78 - 82
  • [20] The idea: The critical issue in the innovation process
    Gaynor G.H.
    IEEE Engineering Management Review, 2017, 45 (02): : 16 - 18